Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mitt Romney’s Electoral College Advantage
City Journal ^ | 5 July 2012 | Tim Groseclose

Posted on 07/06/2012 8:03:33 PM PDT by neverdem

Why the GOP nominee has a slight edge in the one poll that counts

Suppose that this November’s presidential election is so close that one candidate wins the popular vote and the other wins the Electoral College (and thus the election). Which candidate, Mitt Romney or Barack Obama, or neither, holds an edge in the Electoral College system for choosing U.S. presidents? Though his advantage is small, I believe it belongs to Romney.

My analysis begins with what I call a “political quotient.” I’ve constructed this device to measure a person’s political views quantitatively. Higher PQs correspond to more liberal views, with “100” indicating an outlook approximately as liberal as Nancy Pelosi’s or Barney Frank’s, while “0” indicates positions approximately as conservative as Jim DeMint’s or Michele Bachmann’s. According to my estimates, the PQ of the average American voter is 50.4.

In my book, Left Turn, and on my website, I estimate the PQ of the average voter in each of the 50 states and find that Iowa is the most moderate state in the nation: its average PQ, 50.7, is closest of all states to the national PQ of 50.4. In 2008, Iowa was also the median state in the Electoral College. That is, suppose you ordered all the representatives of the 2008 Electoral College according to the PQ of the representative’s state, starting with the lowest. In such an ordering, the first six members would be the representatives from Utah (the nation’s most conservative state), the next three members would be the representatives from Wyoming (the nation’s second-most conservative state), and so on. Such a list would contain 538 members, and the 270th member (the number necessary to win a majority of the Electoral College) would be a representative from Iowa.

In 2012, however, the median PQ state shifted to Colorado, a slightly more conservative state than Iowa, with a PQ of 48.2. The reason: conservative states (those with PQs lower than Iowa’s) gained six electoral votes in the last census. Thus, if the nation votes exactly 50–50, then Iowa would also be likely to vote almost exactly 50–50 (since its PQ is nearly the same as the nation’s PQ). But Colorado would tilt toward Romney, and with increased conservative electoral representation, so would the Electoral College.

One PQ point translates into about a half percentage point in terms of votes in a national election. For instance, Colorado is about 2.2 PQ points more conservative than the national average (50.4 minus 48.2). Accordingly, in a national election, we can expect Colorado to vote for the more conservative candidate by about 1.1 percentage points (one-half of 2.2) higher than the nation. If in the upcoming election the nation splits its vote 50–50 between Obama and Romney, then Colorado would vote 1.1 percent higher—or 51.1 to 48.9—for Romney.

Thus, according to my analysis, if the election produces a split decision, with a majority of the electorate picking one candidate and the Electoral College picking the other, Romney would win the Electoral College and become president.

Some recent polls support this forecast. Currently, the RealClearPolitics average poll, which surveys voters across the nation, gives Obama a 2.6 percent lead over Romney. Meanwhile, an NBC News/Wall Street Journal poll, which surveys voters in twelve swing states, gives Romney an 8-point lead over Obama. The average PQ of the 12 swing states is 48.7—almost exactly the PQ of Colorado. The 12 states should therefore predict very well the outcome of the Electoral College. These polls, like my PQ analysis, suggest that the Electoral College tilts slightly toward Romney, compared with a pure popular-vote system. Expect soon for liberals to renew their complaints about the unfairness of the Electoral College.

Tim Groseclose is the Marvin Hoffenberg Professor of American Politics at UCLA and the author of Left Turn: How Liberal Media Bias Distorts the American Mind.



TOPICS: Editorial; Government; Politics/Elections; US: District of Columbia
KEYWORDS: 2012election; election2012; electoralcollege; etchasketch; rino; romney
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-79 next last
Current RealClearPolitics Average

Right Direction 30.2 Wrong Track 61.3

I doubt that the popular vote is close.

1 posted on 07/06/2012 8:03:42 PM PDT by neverdem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Shades of Bush/Gore, Kennedy/Nixon. Not good. The Dems will kick scream get violent.


2 posted on 07/06/2012 8:07:39 PM PDT by Clock King
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Rasmussen is the one I trust most. And right now, he’s got Romney up +2 nationally and either tied or ahead in almost all of the major battleground states.


3 posted on 07/06/2012 8:10:30 PM PDT by MrChips (MrChips)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

If that happens we’ll have race warfare for Christmas.


4 posted on 07/06/2012 8:12:01 PM PDT by lightman (Adjutorium nostrum (+) in nomine Domini--nevertheless, Vote Santorum!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

If we have another 2000 election I’ll probably suffer a heart attack. I barely made it through that one.


5 posted on 07/06/2012 8:13:02 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (In honor of my late father, GunnerySgt/Commo Chief, USMC 1943-65)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clock King

hmm ~ did you realize that when the Democrats ran the more Conservative candidate immediately after the Eisenhower years THEY WON!


6 posted on 07/06/2012 8:14:00 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MrChips
Its Mitt's to lose

He does have more money than Obama unlike Mc Cain and his losers

Sarah Palin could have won it they would have given her real power

7 posted on 07/06/2012 8:14:20 PM PDT by scooby321 (h tones)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Fear not. I think they have done away with hanging chads.


8 posted on 07/06/2012 8:14:49 PM PDT by MrChips (MrChips)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Additionally, if the electoral college did not have a majority of votes for one candidate, then it goes to the house where each state delegation gets one vote: more state delegations are majority republican than majority democrat, so the republicans would win.


9 posted on 07/06/2012 8:15:17 PM PDT by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! Those who truly support our troops pray for their victory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: scooby321

Hope he has the sense to get a VP with the quality of Sarah.


10 posted on 07/06/2012 8:16:54 PM PDT by hoosiermama (Obama: "Born in Kenya" Lying now or then.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: MrChips

I’ve read Tim’s book and strongly recommend it. He is a scientist who tests his hypotheses and who deliberately weights his model against his hypotheses to compensate for how own bias.


11 posted on 07/06/2012 8:28:29 PM PDT by LS ("Castles Made of Sand, Fall in the Sea . . . Eventually (Hendrix))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: scooby321

Romney is losing it right now before our very eyes.

He has let Obama define him as an “outsourcer” all summer long without responding, and it has stuck. Most polls, save Rasmussen, now show Obama with a lead outside the margin of error.

Obama got a huge assist from John Roberts as well. His ridiculous rulings on immigration and healthcare caught Romney off-guard, and Mitt’s responses were very uninspiring.

He is definitely playing catch-up now.


12 posted on 07/06/2012 8:29:11 PM PDT by comebacknewt (Newt (sigh) what could have been . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Obama won’t win the electoral or the popular vote.


13 posted on 07/06/2012 8:37:44 PM PDT by pallis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: comebacknewt

Yeah, that’s why Romney has set records fund raising...he’s uninspiring and losing.


14 posted on 07/06/2012 8:38:33 PM PDT by MissouriConservative (Voting Anyone but Obama in 2012.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

I hope I’m wrong, but I doubt Mittens has a snowball’s chance in hell.

Right now, his campaign is making McCain’s look mean and vicious by comparison. I don’t think he’ll be able to articulate a conservative message or deliver a political killing blow.


15 posted on 07/06/2012 8:41:52 PM PDT by KoRn (Department of Homeland Security, Certified - "Right Wing Extremist")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LS

I will read anything that gives me hope. The thought of Obama’s re-election truly scares me to death.


16 posted on 07/06/2012 8:42:18 PM PDT by MrChips (MrChips)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: KoRn
Right now, his campaign is making McCain’s look mean and vicious by comparison.

I guess you missed Pawlenty's speech on CSPAN from Pennsylvania... "...Reading from his teleprompter... flapping his jaws..." Yeowch!
17 posted on 07/06/2012 8:50:38 PM PDT by BigEdLB (Now there ARE 1,000,000 regrets - but it may be too late.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: comebacknewt
He is definitely playing catch-up now.

By taking vacation while Bambi basks in the glow of his SCOTUS victory?

18 posted on 07/06/2012 8:54:30 PM PDT by lightman (Adjutorium nostrum (+) in nomine Domini--nevertheless, Vote Santorum!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: MrChips

Given the Roberts Dependence Day decision, it’s best to plan for Zer0 to get a second bite of the apple.


19 posted on 07/06/2012 8:58:03 PM PDT by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Clock King

My thoughts exactly.


20 posted on 07/06/2012 9:00:25 PM PDT by SandRat (Duty - Honor - Country! What else needs said?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-79 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson