Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama Wins the Battle, Roberts Wins the War
Slate Scocca ^ | 28 June 2012 | Tom

Posted on 06/28/2012 12:15:09 PM PDT by Lorianne

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-100 next last
To: skeeter

“How is that in any way a good thing?”

Small consolation but I guess all the Democrats who campaigned
on a no-tax increase for the ‘working class’ but voted for Obumble-
care lied to their constituents. May just be too early to tell just
how this all shakes out. Maybe Roberts helped us in the long run.


41 posted on 06/28/2012 12:48:22 PM PDT by Sivad (NorCal Red Turf)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Dr.Zoidberg

Indeed!

It’s incredible seeing the mental gymnastics being performed. This was a full frontal assault in the daylight.

“He has erected a multitude of New Offices, and sent hither swarms of Officers to harrass our people, and eat out their substance.”

- United States Declaration of Independence


42 posted on 06/28/2012 12:48:51 PM PDT by Kaosinla (The More the Plans Fail. The More the Planners Plan.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: fatima
I spit on Robert’s and he no longer exists to me.I am changing my party today to independent

a rash decision based on your misunderstanding of what tcook place here. In my (never to be humble) opinion, Roberts did not rule in favor of the law, only that it was not unconstitutional. Laws can be overturned, constitutional or not and this one should be. He did, however, restrict the authority of the legislature under the commerce clause. Obamacare has an unknown future. It is a bad law and should be repealed and this congress and future ones will see their powers somewhat restricted under commerce.

43 posted on 06/28/2012 12:48:51 PM PDT by terycarl (lurking, but well informed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: old republic
Congress and the President can penalize any behavior and have the Court construe it as a tax.

You bring up an interesting point. Congess would be within its rights to levy a $10,000 tax on any abortion. It wouldn't be a fine, it would be a tax.

44 posted on 06/28/2012 12:49:56 PM PDT by Publius (Leadershiup starts with getting off the couch.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Sivad
Maybe Roberts helped us in the long run.

Maybe, but I won't be thanking him. He's in the same league with Ginsburg now.

45 posted on 06/28/2012 12:50:49 PM PDT by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

What’s the difference? If the federal government can force you to spend every penny you have on, say, green energy products or face a $1M fine, what limits are there now on Congress?


46 posted on 06/28/2012 12:50:53 PM PDT by pabianice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dr.Zoidberg
... room temperature IQ bunch of moral degenerates in congress

WHO put them in Congress? .... it wasn't Roberts. If folks who respected the Constitution & truly had America's best interests (not their own i.e. re-election for power & goodies) were elected to Congress, Obamacare would not have seen the light of day & we never would have gotten to this point. It isn't Bush's fault or Robert's fault, it is OUR fault for continuing to elect this trash and then putting up with it when we don't like what they are doing.

47 posted on 06/28/2012 12:51:18 PM PDT by MissMagnolia (Being powerful is like being a lady. If you have to tell people you are, you aren't. (M.Thatcher))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne
Irrespective of the basis for declaring "Obamacare" constitutional IT IS NOW THE LAW!

Everywhere Liberalism is marching towards total victory. Sodomy is becoming the law of the land, the murder of babies is the law of the land, aliens are flooding into our country and increasing their demands, corruption runs riot among politicians with those exposed flatly refusing to resign; electorial fraud is becoming the norm, the transfer of wealth is now acceptable "from each according to his ability to each according to his need!"

The real question is rapidly becoming "Will ordinary political procedures save the Republic?

48 posted on 06/28/2012 12:51:58 PM PDT by AEMILIUS PAULUS (It is a shame that when these people give a riot)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne

This is the rationalization of losers. I remember when every stupid thing Karl Rove did was rationalized as deep strategy.

So Roberts upholding the worst and most unconstitutional law since the New Deal is engaged in some deep long-term war.

What the author does not understand is that Roberts extended Congress taxing powers so far that the commerce clause NO LONGER MATTERS. Congress can do whatever it wants under the taxing power now.


49 posted on 06/28/2012 12:52:54 PM PDT by ModelBreaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: skeeter
He could’ve thrown the entire POS out AND gutted the commerce clause. With Roberts the votes were there.

Of course!

I'm weary of the spin as well.

His choice was made with an eye on his personal "legacy", not as a result of brilliant jurisprudence.

50 posted on 06/28/2012 12:53:22 PM PDT by BlatherNaut
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: BlatherNaut

His personal “legacy” is The Roberts Tax.


51 posted on 06/28/2012 12:54:30 PM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne

“The individual mandate thus cannot be sustained under Congress’s power to ‘regulate Commerce.’”

Okay, so it’s sustained under some other power. What have we gained? Nothing. The commerce clause has been a thorn in our side ever since McCulloch v. Maryland, and especially since Wickard v. Filburn, but its not as if its the only thing we care about. So the commerce power does have a limit. So what, if the feds can do whatever the hell they want through other means? The commerce power is limited and the taxing power is unlimited. We’ve gained nothing.


52 posted on 06/28/2012 12:54:34 PM PDT by Tublecane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MissMagnolia
It isn't Bush's fault or Robert's fault, it is OUR fault for continuing to elect this trash and then putting up with it when we don't like what they are doing.

Well, I am increasingly agreeing with your above characterization of the Bush family.

53 posted on 06/28/2012 12:54:46 PM PDT by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Publius
You bring up an interesting point. Congess would be within its rights to levy a $10,000 tax on any abortion. It wouldn't be a fine, it would be a tax.

There you go.

In a very real sense, Roberts has thrown down the gauntlet to liberals.

"You will no longer find sanctuary within the court because we have given you the power to pass any tax you desire. Just put it to a vote"

We have always said that liberals take it to the courts because their ideas are wrong and unpopular.

The ball is now in our court.

54 posted on 06/28/2012 12:58:58 PM PDT by eddie willers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Publius
You bring up an interesting point. Congess would be within its rights to levy a $10,000 tax on any abortion. It wouldn't be a fine, it would be a tax.

There you go.

In a very real sense, Roberts has thrown down the gauntlet to liberals.

"You will no longer find sanctuary within the court because we have given you the power to pass any tax you desire. Just put it to a vote"

We have always said that liberals take it to the courts because their ideas are wrong and unpopular.

The ball is now in our court.

55 posted on 06/28/2012 12:58:58 PM PDT by eddie willers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: MissMagnolia

This is one of the reasons that I will only be a down-ticket in Nov. This particular day had it’s conception and birth in Mass. Furthermore, the tactic of using SCOTUS appointees in order to change my decision has been debunked with this ruling.

“The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results.”


56 posted on 06/28/2012 12:58:58 PM PDT by Kaosinla (The More the Plans Fail. The More the Planners Plan.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Publius

“You bring up an interesting point. Congess would be within its rights to levy a $10,000 tax on any abortion. It wouldn’t be a fine, it would be a tax.”

It could also tax you $10,000 for NOT having an abortion.


57 posted on 06/28/2012 12:59:25 PM PDT by ModelBreaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne

This is all nonsense. If a political hack in a black robe wants to find a rationale to justify a particular outcome, then the political hack will find the rationale. It is a fantasy that activist judges are, or ever will be constrained by precedent, or the constitution, or anything else.

All Roberts did with this ruling was join the ranks of activist judges, or the ranks of the other four political hacks in black robes.


58 posted on 06/28/2012 1:01:22 PM PDT by Will88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne

All you people under 60 in this country? Sucks to be you...


59 posted on 06/28/2012 1:01:58 PM PDT by who knows what evil? (G-d saved more animals than people on the ark...www.siameserescue.org.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: old republic
At this rate, the Taxation Clause will be the new Commerce Clause, and using that clause the government won't even need to prove that their legislation substantially affects interstate commerce...only that the government's power to penalize--I mean tax--is legal.

Bottom line, and well said.

One weapon (Commerce Clause) has simply been upgraded for another MORE LETHAL weapon (Taxation).

60 posted on 06/28/2012 1:02:18 PM PDT by BlatherNaut
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-100 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson