Posted on 06/27/2012 8:15:05 AM PDT by Kaslin
You seem to imply that you are OK with civil unions. I’m sure you didn’t mean to leave THAT imprssion.
How can this really matter?
Moslem law limits a man to four wives (all female) at any given moment. But if there is a right for people of EVERY inclination to follow their inclinations, and to call it marriage, it will be impossible to impose a limit to the number or genders (or species?) of the wives/spouses/entities.
Consider the possibilities: you could establish a “communal marriage” for a really BIG group of people, and obtain legal marital status for all of the members of your baseball team, your high school graduation class, your computer firm, or your fire department.
After reading about Margaret Sanger and her eugenics movement in Jonah Goldberg’s book, Liberal Fascism, I’m convinced that the left touts homosexuality as a form of population control. Sexual experimentation without the fear of pregnancy has been the organizing tool of the progressives since the Margaret Sanger days.
Don’t worry, even if you offer “civil unions” as a compromise, the homosexuals won’t accept that. Nothing less than “equal” status with real marriage is acceptable to them.
That’s because they’re not trying to become part of this institution, but destroy it, and a civil union compromise won’t achieve that goal.
There’s a video series called “The Truth Project”,
and once you go through that, you’ll understand all you need to about what motivates the left.
Anything that God values, they despise,
and vice versa.
Take any commandment, state its opposite, and you’ve stated a “liberal” value.
“Generations? Ummm, how does that work?”
Excellent point. Politicians really hate it when you point out the absurdity of their words, because they do not necessarily use words to convey an actual meaning. If the word “generation” means anything, it does not apply to those who cannot possibly generate.
They never leave the house anyway.
What IS Romney doing ? Saying ? About anything ?
And what about Muslim B-A-A-A-A-sexuals?
What if you are a male bisexual lesbian?
I'm not always sure people who argue the loudest know what they are arguing for or against.
Careful there... It also means 2 mother-in-laws as well!
Huge deal breaker for any aspiring guy fantasizing about a haram.
I agree that advocates for Homosexual Marriage have no foundation upon which to exclude Poligamy. In fact you need to look no further than the Study’s Homosexuals themselves have undertaken to see that Non-Monogamous relationships are very common in the Gay Community; they call it polyamory or “Poly” for short. For example “The Couples Study”:
http://thecouplesstudy.com/wp-content/uploads/BeyondMonogamy_1_01.pdf
A video of what gay marriage really looks like, and yes it includes “Poly”: http://vimeo.com/38260489
Here is another interesting read on none other than Eric (with)Holder who was a lawyer on a case of a MMM Poly Murder Case:
http://polyinthemedia.blogspot.com/2009/06/murder-in-dc-poly-gay-triad-suspected.html
I always need to avoid drinking anything even water when Mark Levin goes on a rant about anythig “Bi”.. He is Hillarious in his handling of it!
The day I heard him he was commenting on Obama saying he was for LGBT rights that were being denied them, and so he asked Obama (as an on air public question) exactly what rights bisexuals were being denied. Pretty good question, won't hear the MSM touch the subject.
I caught that too! What a visual-gay grannies etc....ewww.
I am very upset with Johnny Depp. He split with his paramour of 14 years, the mother of his children, to be with a woman who just broke up with her girlfriend of 2 years. She’s bisexual-so she says.
(Johnny-you’re only gonna get your heart broke and I don’t know if Disney’s going to be too happy with you! Call me!)
But seriously, the bisexual people I have known are incapable of making a committment and use the “other” person in the relationship as a weapon or a threat when they aren’t happy -or are just bored. If their “partner” does something they don’t like, they start wandering towards the other sex. They are not well people and are completely egotistical and hedonistic; they are very unpopular in the gay community because they know “how they are”-they tolerate them so they can add to their numbers.. Bisexuals actually had to fight to be accepted by the gay community. They didn’t want them included because they mingle with “us”-the breeders.
I DO see the polygamous marriage becoming legal; how can it not be? “They” have changed the definition of marriage-it will just be changed again...
I say it’s “evolving”....
“One of each” - that was my thought.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.