Well, here we go again..."discerning the intent of the voter" after fraud has been committed.
So, if it's "disenfranchisement" to deny someone who isn't entitled to vote to cast a ballot anyway, what is it called when that vote cancels mine, which is legitimately voted for the other candidate?
posted on 06/25/2012 8:48:33 PM PDT
Wasn’t Racine involved in the *one* recall election where the ‘rats prevailed? By <200 votes?
posted on 06/25/2012 8:56:11 PM PDT
by Nervous Tick
(Trust in God, but row away from the rocks!)
To: bigbob; Hunton Peck; Diana in Wisconsin; P from Sheb; Shady; DonkeyBonker; Wisconsinlady; JPG; ...
Wisconsin Racine Election Irregularity ping
FReep Mail me if you want on, or off, this Wisconsin interest ping list.
So democrat operatives commit fraud and allow people to vote and we need to allow the results to stand because the voter who was not supposed to vote in the first place was allowed to vote.
“It doesn’t matter how they vote, what matters is who counts the votes” Stalin
posted on 06/25/2012 9:05:09 PM PDT
(Romney, Ann Coulter & our ruling republican elites, are Big Government socialists, Grand Ole Sociali)
ou cannot disallow the ballot after it has been cast. Those ballots should have been protested before the voter recieved them. That is what poll watchers are for.
It is unlikely that all, or most, of those voters were intent on committing fraud. This is the fault of the election chief inspector — not training and supervising her workers.
OTOH, what mischief enraged, engaged, and paid unionistas could perpetrate had they a mind to...
"If the election official, made an error and gave them a ballot, you don't disenfranchise the voter," Haas said.
Sure you can. That's why they have these weird things called "rules", "laws", "procedures" and such.
posted on 06/25/2012 9:44:52 PM PDT
(Congrats to Ted Kennedy! He's been sober for two years now!!)
Looks like they are practicing for November.
posted on 06/25/2012 11:07:47 PM PDT
by Mike Darancette
(Ineptocracy; the Obama way.)
Well then, lets have another little old election in Racine for Senator, but make sure that this doesn't happen again. Voters won't be disfranchised, as all real voters can vote again. In the very least this needs to be appealed to a higher court. As it stands now, it is a mockery of the entire system of voting in The USA. This needs to and must be dealt with, as a matter of both principle and precedence.
posted on 06/25/2012 11:22:34 PM PDT
(The LORD is Holy, separated from all sin, perfect, righteous, high and lifted up.)
Ahh, the libs got caught using fraud.
posted on 06/26/2012 12:48:11 AM PDT
(Give me back my conservative vote; then find me a real conservative to vote for)
THIS is why it matters who we vote for and who wins. The Democrat voter fraudsters will learn that lesson.
posted on 06/26/2012 3:50:05 AM PDT
(Conservatism is truth. Liberalism is lies.)
Exactly...those residents of Racine who cast a LEGITIMATE vote have been ‘disenfranchised’ by those who cast an ILLEGITIMATE vote. Everyone who has been ‘disenfranchised’ in such a manner should be raising seven kinds of hell...
posted on 06/26/2012 3:59:44 AM PDT
by who knows what evil?
(G-d saved more animals than people on the ark...www.siameserescue.org.)
After watching the antics in WI, I have to say the state is full of lying crazy hardcore Leftist. How can the regular folks stand them?
posted on 06/26/2012 5:35:06 AM PDT
(El Vaquero. (SC Lowcountry Cowboy))
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson