whats the over/under for when the first one gets pregnant???
Posted on 06/18/2012 5:13:53 PM PDT by QT3.14
We’ll see how long it takes for the first one to turn up pregnant.
Sue the Navy and call for more regulations and grant $$$ to liberal professors to study the system.
PMS Post menstrual submariner
Yep-—the reason they should never be on board to “serve”. They are a hinderance and liability and take up the same space as one male who they can NEVER be equal to-—in strength or emotional calm. A woman is not a man and no matter, how hard they try——they are never interchangeable.
This is a “utopian” Marxist ideal.....to destroy us from within and destroy Natural Laws-—to force the Big Lie that men and women are interchangeable-—the reason for homosexual “marriage” insanity.
Marx wanted no differences between the sexes and no mothers and fathers-—the state would raise all children and shape their worldview. This is to kill the mother instinct and the male instinct to “protect” women. It is to destroy the complementary cohesion of male and female. You never treat male and female the same-—they are not. It is fact!
The conditioning and brainwashing continues and the military has been infiltrated by Marxists to destroy it.
whats the over/under for when the first one gets pregnant???
Surely there’s some bookmakers in Vegas or Britain that will offer that betting line?
New submarine classification. Here's an idea for the first hull number with an all-
female crew:
Can she please explain what adjusting she had to do, since she wasn't even on the sub before?
I'm more or less resigned to this, but there are still some comments that cause me to want to kick someone's ass.
prolly InTrade... 8^)
I can understand a petticoat crew, maybe on a boomer. But what happens on a long term cruise when some rating gets pregnant.
Especially if you’re on a boomer and you can’t just come in off a classified cruise.
Obviously, we’ll just have to add a daycare section to the sub then, won’t we?
They’ll have to go to all female crews.
Then there won’t be any seamen onboard.
That is what I meant when I wrote this. It is what they will SAY.
And to them, in a weird Orwellian way, it will be true, because to them the definition of “successful” is entirely plastic to suit their needs.
And that definition won’t have anything to do with system capability, but all to do with some other political goal.
Just imagine how the wives of the men who are at home feel about having their husbands ship out where they have limited communication with a bunch of other women.
My wife worked as a family counselor to Navy Submariner’s and it was bad enough with the long silent separations.
That there is funny... I don’t care who you are!
LLS
Literally!
LLS
How good it would be to have another strong president for our military and foreign affairs in the WH.
There would undoubtedly be a fair sized exodus from the higher ranks or at least a sudden change of opinion on these matters by many of them.
We can only hope.
50 millimeters, um, you aren’t working with much effective range, seaman dribbler...
It would just be cruel if those were the two women on the boat.
Kinda like a man in the boat?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.