Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Global clean-energy 'revolution' falters ahead of Rio
EurActiv ^ | 18 June 2012 | Timothy Spence

Posted on 06/18/2012 9:19:08 AM PDT by Olog-hai

A UN push to provide electricity to more than one billion people who live off the grid is threatened by indecision at an important global development conference this week, despite robust support from EU leaders.

Ban Ki-moon, the UN secretary-general, has called for a “global clean energy revolution” to provide electricity to the developing world by 2030 and he won commitments to the plan from the European Commission earlier this year.

But negotiators meeting in New York ahead of the 20th anniversary Earth Summit in Rio de Janeiro appeared to fall short of agreeing commitments to provide sustainable energy in some of the world’s most impoverished regions, though the final conclusions are likely to support the concept.

“A New York agreement about that was not reached,” Environment Commissioner Janez Potočnik said in Brussels before heading to the Brazil meetings.

“It’s logical and should be supported by everybody, but we hope we will find an agreement,” he said. “It’s absolutely something which is a must for human development.”

Potočnik has pressed for an assertive EU role in winning binding ecological commitments at Rio from wary partners in developing and rich nations alike. …

But one UN Development Program official, speaking on condition of anonymity, said donor fatigue in times of economic troubles is part of the problem. …

(Excerpt) Read more at euractiv.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Crime/Corruption; Foreign Affairs; Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: cleanenergy; energyrevolution; offthegrid; un

1 posted on 06/18/2012 9:19:21 AM PDT by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

These people are smoking crack.


2 posted on 06/18/2012 9:26:11 AM PDT by henkster (Why should I care? Why should I care?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: henkster

They’re not. They have accomplished many of their agenda 21 goals, mostly because they buy our politicians and the Anerican people who should be paying attention don’t.


3 posted on 06/18/2012 9:29:50 AM PDT by hedgetrimmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: hedgetrimmer

Something tells me that Agenda 21 can be achieved while intoxicated on crack . . .


4 posted on 06/18/2012 9:32:12 AM PDT by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: hedgetrimmer

I think talk of this so called “faltering” is little more than a smokescreen. My electric company is building wind farms whether the people want them or not.


5 posted on 06/18/2012 9:43:54 AM PDT by cripplecreek (What does it profit a man if he gains the whole world but loses his soul?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Ye canna change the laws of physics. Wishing that giant fans or pixie powered sparkle buggies will somehow magically make those laws go away will not make it so.


6 posted on 06/18/2012 9:46:11 AM PDT by Edward Teach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Make Solyndra a branch of the United Nations!


7 posted on 06/18/2012 9:49:07 AM PDT by nascarnation
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: steelyourfaith; thackney

Ping.


8 posted on 06/18/2012 10:19:08 AM PDT by Army Air Corps (Four Fried Chickens and a Coke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

They finally took the Solyndra logo down off one of the plants we taxpayers bought.

They’re not building anything the people want and we’re still paying them for it!


9 posted on 06/18/2012 2:22:14 PM PDT by hedgetrimmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: hedgetrimmer
Town Votes Down Windmill Plan, Board Moving Ahead Anyway

The people voted against zoning for the windmills so the township ceded the land to a neighboring township that had already zoned for them.

99% of the time I'll side with the individual landowner but these landowners signed leases knowing that there would be a zoning issue. And again, I usually side with the individual landowner but in this case windmills are an unavoidable and permanent eyesore which will negatively impact already depressed property values.
10 posted on 06/18/2012 3:03:25 PM PDT by cripplecreek (What does it profit a man if he gains the whole world but loses his soul?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson