Posted on 06/18/2012 8:18:19 AM PDT by Brown Deer
The video of today’s hearing ...
(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...
This judge appears to be taking the issue seriously. The Obummer usurpation team have been getting a free ride...they may not get it in this court room. Court now in session.
Obama attorneys argue he’s not Dem nominee
http://www.wnd.com/2012/06/obama-attorneys-argue-hes-not-dem-nominee/
SNIP
The arguments by Obama’s attorneys reflected their desire to have the judge simply dismiss the case because they claim a sitting president chosen by his party at multiple levels is not yet or officially the nominee.
Klayman accused them of running a “shell game” and simply trying to put off the issue, as numerous court cases did during the 2008 election, until the election was over and Obama was inaugurated.
The judge called the hearing on the issue of Obama’s eligibility because as part of the challenge, Klayman cited a definition of “natural born citizen,” which the Constitution requires of presidents, from the U.S. Supreme Court. Obama’s attorneys, however, simply said that didn’t apply but offered no further citations.
What law team is doing a telephone-court councel? I missed part of that.
What law team is doing a telephone-court counsel? I missed part of that. ...I know now.
...Obama team gets two lawyers to attend by phone.
So they can't find any cases to cite that Zero is a NBC. I'm surprised they even bothered to show up.
It worked last time so they are going to try it again.
Spit OBot lawyer lawyer citing Florida law of who qualify for the FL ballot ...plaintiff can’t get any relief.
The Constitution supports Obama. Citing party electors.
The old "We ain't got nothing but forgeries defense" and the "We don't want to go up against the constitution, so lets drop it defense".
There is no way this judge rules against zero. He looked scared just talking about it.
This is going no where.
This guy doesn’t want to get a Breitbart Dart.
O’s team has counsel via conference call .. I know it’s an attorney from Miami .. Rosenbloom? Rothman? You can playback the video.
http://www.wnd.com/2012/06/209789/
OMG .. I’m just ROFLMBO ... his attorneys are actually seriously stipulating that he’s not the candidate .. yet. They read the doc where he was placed in contention last October (the ONLY one), but he’s not the official candidate for the Dems. That’s their grounds????? OMG ... unreal the depths of minutiae and granularity for which they’re reaching..
Standing, etc., hearing date have to perfectly converge with the exact moment he’s an officially declared candidate??
God bless Judge Lewis with supernatural courage and clarity.
Obot - ‘There was no FL Drat presidential preference primary’; so “can’t be any contest” ...
OBama lawyer cited Florida statute 102.168 and sub section 3.
If I’m understanding this correctly, Bob Kerrey filed to be on the Nebraska democratic Senate primary ballot at the very last possible moment (5pm on the last day you can file), and when his eligibility was challenged because he’s not a Nebraska resident, it was thrown out because it was “too late to file a challenge”. You can’t file a challenge until the person is a candidate and whoever is unchallenged at 5pm on the last date of filing automatically goes on the ballot. As long as Bob Kerrey was the last person in line before they closed that office, there was no way to challenge his eligibility.
But I think there should be penalties for saying you’re eligible when you’re really not. Like perjury penalties.
What would make me laugh my guts out would be if the judges said you can only challenge when somebody is the DNC’s final candidate, and then the dems were left without ANY candidate on the ballots all over the country because Obama was thrown out.
It would serve them right. They should be thanking anybody who raises the issue while they still have the opportunity to choose another candidate - maybe inmate #xxxx.
Judge questioned about conception v. birth.
Klayman cited Marshall’s Venus case to go along with Minor v. Happersett.
Klayman just accused the Obama defense for lying by omission about the FL Supreme Court opinion. They are playing a shell game.
ping for later read
Did Obama already file the paperwork with SOS to be on the upcoming FL state primary ballot, or not?
I don’t know, but how can somebody argue that a guy’s name should be allowed on the ballot because he’s not running? lol
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.