Playing Russian roulette with our lives. Outdated? I think not. Typical Democrat move.
It's bad enough not knowing what you're getting but adding this to the chain make it even more frightening.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-31 last
To: TribalPrincess2U
Kerry gets the dumbass award.
Liberalism really is a mental disorder.
35 posted on
06/15/2012 8:36:01 AM PDT by
TheConservativeParty
(My Governor's a JEDI, Wisconsin for the WIN ! June 5, 2012)
To: TribalPrincess2U
It’s time for democrat blood banks and Republcan blood banks ... democrat hospitals and republican hospitals. People lying about their political leanings will be fined... Then let ‘em do whatever they want...
37 posted on
06/15/2012 8:38:13 AM PDT by
GOPJ
(Take your little hammer, little sickle and your scary red signs with a fist on it, and go home...)
To: TribalPrincess2U
I am prohibited from donating because I served (Army) in Germany 26 years ago. My daughter is prohibited from donating because she was born in Germany 28 years ago and lived there until the ripe old age of 2. The reason? Fear of spreading mad cow disease. I think if they want to get donors, they should end these bans long before they eliminate the ban on “low risk” homosexual donations.
40 posted on
06/15/2012 8:43:58 AM PDT by
callthemlikeyouseethem
(Biden10/19/08: "I probably shouldn't have said all this because.. the press is here")
To: TribalPrincess2U
a “low risk” homosexual is like being a little bit pregnant.
44 posted on
06/15/2012 9:06:27 AM PDT by
elpadre
(AfganistaMr Obama said the goal was to "disrupt, dismantle and defeat al-hereQaeda" and its allies.)
To: TribalPrincess2U
“Low risk blood” has already killed tens of thousands just so the homosexuals wouldn’t feel offended.
45 posted on
06/15/2012 9:22:50 AM PDT by
count-your-change
(You don't have to be brilliant, not being stupid is enough.)
To: TribalPrincess2U
Who among us would want homo blood in our veins?
To: TribalPrincess2U
Solicited by Sebelius, no doubt.
47 posted on
06/15/2012 10:53:37 AM PDT by
expat2
To: TribalPrincess2U
What is the reason for this?
To spit on us and show us who really has the power?
To make queers feel better?
Does someone, somewhere believe it is necessary?
Or is it just another step in tightening the screws on us a little more?
48 posted on
06/15/2012 10:57:20 AM PDT by
Iron Munro
(John Adams: 'Two ways to enslave a country. One is by the sword, the other is by debt')
To: TribalPrincess2U
In some ways it’s good they’ve done this. It opens the door to discuss the actual health statistics of the gay community - cite the CDC stats all day long!!!!
51 posted on
06/15/2012 11:50:50 AM PDT by
fuzzylogic
(welfare state = sharing consequences of poor moral choices among everybody)
To: TribalPrincess2U
we'll have donate to our ownselves....at least for elective surgeries...of course they'll probably ban that soon.....
if they allow homos to donate, then they've seen my last donation....I won't play along...
54 posted on
06/15/2012 11:58:28 AM PDT by
cherry
To: TribalPrincess2U; Chode
There is no such thing as a “low risk” homosexual male.
55 posted on
06/15/2012 9:35:55 PM PDT by
Morgana
(I only come here to see what happens next. It normally does.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-31 last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson