Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: JustSayNoToNannies

It is stupid because it implies that parents have a choice between hugging their kids and giving them drugs. Not that many parents are inclined to give their kids drugs, and some of the best-loved kids end up on drugs. Kids really need discipline more than namby-pamby touchy-feely “be nice to them and they will do whatever you want.” That doesn’t work worth a damn.


13 posted on 06/11/2012 9:14:35 AM PDT by webheart (King of the Run-On Sentence)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: webheart
It is stupid because it implies that parents have a choice between hugging their kids and giving them drugs.

No, it implies that some kids turn to drugs to blot the pain of having had too little parental love - and that more of the latter can lead to less likelihood of the former. I don't know why any conservative would object to that (so long as its not presented as the silver bullet to end all drug use, which it never was as far as I know).

15 posted on 06/11/2012 9:33:51 AM PDT by JustSayNoToNannies (A free society's default policy: it's none of government's business.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson