Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Tomorrowland meets Texas - Futuristic freight system planned for I-35 corridor
Fort Worth Star-Telegram ^ | June 6, 2012

Posted on 06/06/2012 2:44:37 PM PDT by Zakeet

Freight normally hauled by trucks could one day soon be shipped on an electric-powered, overhead guideway across Texas. It may seem like an idea more suitable for Tomorrowland – and artist renderings of the project do resemble Disney’s famed monorail system – but Texas officials are encouraging a privately-funded business to get the project up and running, perhaps within six years.

[The developers] have formed Freight Shuttle International, a company that is cobbling together the estimated $2.5 billion needed to build the first leg of this futuristic transportation system. The guideways would be built within the existing right-of-way of Interstate 35, initially stretching about 250 miles from San Antonio to Waxahachie – but eventually extending north through Dallas-Fort Worth, and south to the Mexican border. Ultimately, Freight Shuttle guideways could be built on more than 2,000 miles of highway right-of-way across the state, he said.

The system would haul cargo of various sizes, packed in both intermodal containers and freight trailers. Terminals would be built at each end of the route, so that trucks could load and off-load their goods onto the Freight Shuttle guideways. The shipments would be placed on unmanned transporters powered by linear induction motors using electricity and a magnetic field. They would glide on steel wheels across the guideways at about 60 mph, Roop told members of the Tarrant Regional Transportation Coalition during a meeting Wednesday in Fort Worth.

Shippers would be able to get their goods across the state for pennies on the dollar compared to what it costs to haul freight in tractor-trailers, said Ken Allen, a retired logistics executive for grocery giant H-E-B Stores and chief executive officer of Freight Shuttle International’s operations unit.

(Excerpt) Read more at blogs.star-telegram.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; News/Current Events; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: rail; texas; transportation
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-84 next last

This will never work because it relies on the private sector rather than government handouts!

1 posted on 06/06/2012 2:44:46 PM PDT by Zakeet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Zakeet

They’d be better off to build a canal.


2 posted on 06/06/2012 2:47:54 PM PDT by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet
"....get their goods across the state for pennies on the dollar compared to what it costs to haul freight in tractor-trailers"

LOL, let's the accounting on that. More like hundreds of pennies

3 posted on 06/06/2012 2:49:33 PM PDT by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet

We already have that.. its called “TRAINS”...
Like in choo choo trains..


4 posted on 06/06/2012 2:50:25 PM PDT by hosepipe (This propaganda has been edited to include some fully orbed hyperbole...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paladin2

the canal/barge system has been a reliable transportation system all over the world for hundreds of years..


5 posted on 06/06/2012 2:50:42 PM PDT by elpadre (AfganistaMr Obama said the goal was to "disrupt, dismantle and defeat al-hereQaeda" and its allies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet

Teamsters and other union thugs - hardest hit


6 posted on 06/06/2012 2:50:42 PM PDT by lormand (A Government who robs Peter to pay Paul, will always have the support of Paul)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paladin2
They’d be better off to build a canal.

Takes too much land compared to elevated (unipost) tracks.

7 posted on 06/06/2012 2:51:14 PM PDT by Drill Thrawl (Another day. Another small provocation. Another step closer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet
Just think how many Mexicans can be crammed into a cargo container and how fast they can be sent north.

I'm all for alleviating the traffic problems on I-35, but this would need some heavy-duty safeguards.

8 posted on 06/06/2012 2:52:22 PM PDT by Charles Martel (Endeavor to persevere...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: elpadre

Water transport is still the cheapest per ton mile.


9 posted on 06/06/2012 2:53:20 PM PDT by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: hosepipe

exactly.


10 posted on 06/06/2012 2:53:33 PM PDT by Usagi_yo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Paladin2

“They’d be better off to build a canal.”

Wouldn’t it be pretty hard to elevate all that water?


11 posted on 06/06/2012 2:53:33 PM PDT by ngat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet

What Texan could possibly argue with installing a full-length shade cover over I-35? LOL


12 posted on 06/06/2012 2:54:53 PM PDT by Windflier (To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ngat

If they had enough traffic, it wouldn’t take much water.


13 posted on 06/06/2012 2:55:03 PM PDT by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Paladin2

For just dollars on the dollar.


14 posted on 06/06/2012 2:55:55 PM PDT by cripplecreek (What does it profit a man if he gains the whole world but loses his soul?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Paladin2

They have barges that go 60 miles an hour?


15 posted on 06/06/2012 2:58:40 PM PDT by ngat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Paladin2
They’d be better off to build a canal.

And how many sets of locks over that 250-mile stretch between Dallas and Austin? I-35 climbs higher above sea level as you head north.

16 posted on 06/06/2012 2:58:52 PM PDT by Charles Martel (Endeavor to persevere...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ngat
Wouldn’t it be pretty hard to elevate all that water?

Not hard in a technical sense, just expensive to build and time-consuming to use. Canal locks don't exactly make for speedy transport.

17 posted on 06/06/2012 3:02:47 PM PDT by Charles Martel (Endeavor to persevere...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: ngat
"Pontcysyllte Aquaduct"


18 posted on 06/06/2012 3:02:52 PM PDT by BwanaNdege (Man has often lost his way, but modern man has lost his address - Gilbert K. Chesterton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Paladin2
Water transport is still the cheapest per ton mile.

Followed by rail.

The artist conception shows single containers being moved and that can't be as economical as a train hauling hundreds of containers at the same time. Claiming that they'll be able to move them at 60 mph doesn't impress me much either. Aside from raw food, very little freight is that time sensitive.
19 posted on 06/06/2012 3:06:28 PM PDT by cripplecreek (What does it profit a man if he gains the whole world but loses his soul?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet
It is an interesting idea of creative thinking. You take the existing paradigm and shift it or turn it inside out. Instead of worrying about mass high-speed passenger transport, you apply the new technology to freight transport, and let the people continue travelling as they do now.

Still, it does seem a little wacky. Sending freight one car at a time along electric rails? A conventional train might move a lot more stuff with less energy consumption in a reasonable period if there's no urgency. If there is urgency, we have other ways to get the goods where they have to go.

20 posted on 06/06/2012 3:08:11 PM PDT by x
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-84 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson