Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

CFR & U.S. Army Chief of Staff:Use Army for Domestic Enforcement
New American ^ | 6/4/12 | Joe Wolverton II

Posted on 06/04/2012 2:42:54 PM PDT by Nachum

The Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) proposes that the U.S. Army be used to plan, command, and carry out (with the help of civilian law enforcement) domestic police missions. So says a story appearing in the May/June issue of the influential organization’s official journal, Foreign Affairs. The article lacks a single reference to the Posse Comitatus Act, which prohibits such actions. In an article penned by Chief of Staff of the U.S. Army, General Raymond T. Odierno, the CFR would see the Army used to address “challenges in the United States itself” in order to keep the homeland safe from

(Excerpt) Read more at thenewamerican.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 2012; army; bloodoftyrants; cfr; chief; corruption; cwii; cwiiping; donttreadonme; enforcement; govtabuse; lping; military; odierno; policestate; possecomitatus; rapeofliberty; standdown; tyranny; unconstitutional; waronliberty
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-72 next last
What Posse Comitatus? That's so old school. Time for Hopey Changey.
1 posted on 06/04/2012 2:42:57 PM PDT by Nachum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Jet Jaguar; NorwegianViking; ExTexasRedhead; HollyB; FromLori; EricTheRed_VocalMinority; ...

The list, Ping

Let me know if you would like to be on or off the ping list

http://www.nachumlist.com/


2 posted on 06/04/2012 2:44:29 PM PDT by Nachum (The complete Obama list at www.nachumlist.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Odierno needs to be taken out and tarred and feathered.

What a despicable jerk. Another of the perfumed princes.

He is a very dangerous man.

POS!


3 posted on 06/04/2012 2:47:23 PM PDT by x1stcav (There's a bunch of us out here spoiling for a fight.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Why does everybody still believe we’ll have free elections for very long?


4 posted on 06/04/2012 2:47:27 PM PDT by wastedyears ("God? I didn't know he was signed onto the system.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Does anyone need more evidence that the CFR is an enemy organization made up of traitors?


5 posted on 06/04/2012 2:52:06 PM PDT by freedomfiter2 (Brutal acts of commission and yawning acts of omission both strengthen the hand of the devil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

bookmark


6 posted on 06/04/2012 2:52:55 PM PDT by antisocial (Texas SCV - Deo Vindice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
in order to keep the homeland safe from ..... Obama ?...Freedom ? ...Liberty ? ... What a shame our children in public school didn't learn about the Constitution instead they are being taught how to be a good Communists !
7 posted on 06/04/2012 2:53:25 PM PDT by ATOMIC_PUNK (Any man may make a mistake ; none but a fool will persist in it . { Latin proverb })
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

The first use of the military would be scheduled for the day after this November’s vote...if things don’t go Zero’s way.


8 posted on 06/04/2012 2:57:22 PM PDT by Wordkraft (Remember who the Collaborators are.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wordkraft

It is the Governments intent to keep America safe from the citizens not for the citizens


9 posted on 06/04/2012 3:00:15 PM PDT by Breto (The Establishment party is killing our country)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Odierno and Petreous made a great team in rag-head territory, and I had not realized until recently that he’s been elevated in command. Good on him - but what’s this bullshit he’s spewing.

Does Odierno suffer from stress syndrome, to come up with such a stupid suggestion during Zer0’s administration? Slap this boy across the head!


10 posted on 06/04/2012 3:04:26 PM PDT by Noob1999 (Loose Lips, Sink Ships)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
Army? Feh! We need the Air Force Global Strike Command involved in law enforcement? Anything from a smart bomb dropped from a B-2 on a speeder to a full nuclear strike on a 7-Eleven serving a 17 ounce drink, the Global Strike Command is there to utterly destroy threats to this country.
11 posted on 06/04/2012 3:08:30 PM PDT by KarlInOhio (You only have three billion heartbeats in a lifetime.How many does the government claim as its own?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
The Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) proposes that the U.S. Army be used to plan, command, and carry out (with the help of civilian law enforcement) domestic police missions...The article lacks a single reference to the Posse Comitatus Act, which prohibits such actions.

Nope. That law prohibits state or local officials from using the Army in such a way. It does not prohibit the president from using federal troops to enforce the laws, as indeed presidents have often done throughout our history.

And which, in many circumstances, they should do. Or does anyone claim that if a Bombay-style major terror attack were launched on an American city, we should not use the US military to fight back? Or that if the drug cartel wars spill over into the USA, only local and state forces should respond?

Obviously, use of federal troops to enforce the law can be abused. But the concept is not of itself wrong, it is in fact necessary.

The PCA also does not prohibit governors from using National Guard troops to enforce the law.

I note that the article spends a bunch of time ranting about the Iraq and Afghanistan wars being illegal.

They're not. You can argue, and I'll probably agree, that they were ill-advised. But they are perfectly legal under the Constitution.

12 posted on 06/04/2012 3:08:59 PM PDT by Sherman Logan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Continued: from domestic disasters, including terrorist attacks.


13 posted on 06/04/2012 3:12:57 PM PDT by John W (Viva Cristo Rey!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sherman Logan
Obviously, use of federal troops to enforce the law can be abused.

I think the odds would be 100%, that it could be, and would be abused.

14 posted on 06/04/2012 3:18:01 PM PDT by Mark17 (California, where English is a foreign language)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

The police Mirandizes; the military vaporizes.


15 posted on 06/04/2012 3:19:02 PM PDT by Harley (Will Rogers never met Harry Reid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: x1stcav
and THAT, is putting it mildly... thank you
16 posted on 06/04/2012 3:39:35 PM PDT by Chode (American Hedonist - *DTOM* -ww- NO Pity for the LAZY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee
here we go...
17 posted on 06/04/2012 3:41:08 PM PDT by Chode (American Hedonist - *DTOM* -ww- NO Pity for the LAZY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
Let's see, the bill is probably already on paper and Congress will pass it and the obozo will sign it at midnight on a convenient holiday or on a Friday. However, the MSM won't cover it no matter when it gets passed and signed. Declaration of Martial Law to follow.
18 posted on 06/04/2012 3:42:51 PM PDT by drypowder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Does this mean I can now go down to the Inner Harbor in Baltimore and not be attacked by gangs of roving youths from the hood?


19 posted on 06/04/2012 3:50:41 PM PDT by Mythbuster1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
Odierno????

Can we please get someone back in a position of power with a effin' AMERICAN NAME?

Smith? Jones? Hello? Shoot, I'll go for a Bobabowitz!

20 posted on 06/04/2012 4:07:29 PM PDT by IrishPennant (Are you behind a "Blade of Grass?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-72 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson