Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Freeper Research: I am Looking for Links to Stories About Recycling Not Working
060212 | Chickensoup

Posted on 06/02/2012 5:42:17 PM PDT by Chickensoup

I am looking for links to stories about recycling not working.

I seem to recall one of the Scandinavian countries admitting that they did not see any good in it.

I had read many stories of how recycling was piling up at waste centers because it was to expensive to haul, and the economy had slowed down.

But I cannot find links to show my leftist friend who believes all the fairy tales the leftist have to tell.

Thanks fellow Freepers!


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Government
KEYWORDS: recycling; vanity
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061 next last
To: Chickensoup

Read P.J. O’Rourke’s “All the Trouble In the World”


41 posted on 06/02/2012 6:59:21 PM PDT by CrazyIvan (Obama's birth certificate was found stapled to Soros's receipt.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Chickensoup; Sirius Lee; lilycicero; MaryLou1; glock rocks; JPG; Monkey Face; RIghtwardHo; ...
+

Freep-mail me to get on or off my pro-life and Catholic List:

Add me / Remove me

Please ping me to note-worthy Pro-Life or Catholic threads, or other threads of general interest.


42 posted on 06/02/2012 7:01:46 PM PDT by narses
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Chickensoup

http://www.care2.com/causes/study-finds-landfills-are-greener-than-recycling.html


43 posted on 06/02/2012 7:06:17 PM PDT by SaraJohnson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Chickensoup

Here’s my favorite:

“More than a third of the waste paper and plastic collected by British local authorities, supermarkets and businesses for recycling is being sent 8,000 miles to China without any knowledge of the environmental or social costs - and to the complete surprise of most consumers.”

More at the link:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/society/2004/sep/20/environment.china

Now that article in the Guardian is from 2004, but if you search with “Great Britain recycling China” as key words, I expect you can find some more recent stuff - I remember reading a couple of years back about some Brit town where the local council had the townspeople separate their crap into about 8 different recycle bins - and then had most of it just shipped off to China.

Just the waste in energy and transportation pollution astounds me.


44 posted on 06/02/2012 7:14:44 PM PDT by Stosh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Chickensoup

Find your city budget.

My city:

Sidewalk repair: $82,000
Street maintenance: $450,000
Recycling Program: $2,400,500

Neighboring city:

Sidewalk repair: $23,000
Street maintenance: $122,400
Recycling Program: $3,545,800

I mean, really, consider it: Cities are spending 5-10 times their annual budget for street repair for these idiotic wasteful recycling programs. They obviously don’t make a profit, they are a huge loss for the city, and drain the budget from what most people would consider as being ‘important.’

And a FYI, I’m the guy in the audience every city budget meeting who stands up and reads off those sections of the budget - the embarrassing parts... Retirement funds for elected officials, costs of their benefits, etc.


45 posted on 06/02/2012 7:31:32 PM PDT by kingu (Everything starts with slashing the size and scope of the federal government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Chickensoup

No, that’s not profit - they are stealing or skimming.

We live in a carbon based world. Oil, e.g. gasoline and diesel. Pretty colored garbage cans in red and green and yellow, dutifully parsing our waste while trucks drive around and pick it up under various regulations - and fines for putting the cans out two hours before the prescribed hour - that is all statist bullshit and is only possible, if not sane or practical, under a surplus wealth society.

The short answer is, we’re broke and can’t afford such nonsense.

In scientific terms, it’s a net energy deficit.

In business terms, it’s not profitable.


46 posted on 06/02/2012 7:44:39 PM PDT by Freedom4US
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Chickensoup
Recycling infrastructure supports future war efforts. Your leftist friend is helping to insure America can kill more anti-Americans wherever they may be.

The Arsenal of Democracy: Conservation and Recycling

The U.S. Government after Pearl Harbor asked Americans to salvage and collect a long list of materials that could be used for the war effort. The materials included paper, aluminum, tin, iron and steel, rubber, silk stockings, and cooking fat. Some of these material like rubber and silk were needed because th Japanese had cut off the supply by their rapid advance through Southeast Asia.

47 posted on 06/02/2012 7:53:07 PM PDT by Reeses
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Chickensoup
This is the best article ever about why government mandated recycling wastes more resources than it saves:

http://www.nytimes.com/1996/06/30/magazine/recycling-is-garbage.html?pagewanted=all&src=pm

This article says that in 2003, the city of Santa Clarita, California was paying $28 per ton to put garbage into a landfill. The city then adopted a mandatory diaper recycling program that cost $1,800 per ton.

http://freeliberal.com/archives/000001.php

This article says that in 2002, 40% of the garbage that New York City residents separated for recycling actually ended up in landfills.

http://www.wnyc.org/articles/wnyc-news/2002/apr/18/city-council-holds-hearings-on-saving-recycling/

48 posted on 06/02/2012 8:02:39 PM PDT by grundle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Freedom4US
Pretty colored garbage cans in red and green and yellow

And they're all made from oil. Why aren't recycling bins ever made from bamboo and picked up by solar powered dump trucks?

49 posted on 06/02/2012 8:14:00 PM PDT by Reeses
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Chickensoup
You know what, 50 years ago my Dad took us kids to the junkyard to drop off saved newspapers and metal junk, he gave us the coins he got for ice cream money. So it worked back then.

I recycle yard waste in my composter and reap the benefits with yummy tomatoes and bigger trees.

Recycling works when the beneficiary is the person doing the recycling but until the government sends us a check for doing the dirty work public recycling is a scam.

50 posted on 06/02/2012 8:23:06 PM PDT by this_ol_patriot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Chickensoup

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2399040/posts


51 posted on 06/02/2012 11:22:34 PM PDT by justrepublican (Screaming like a "Vexatious requester" at a Wellstone memorial...........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Chickensoup
I don't know if this will help, but it's something to chew on (and KUDOS to you for pursuing the topic. I think recycling is one of the biggest pain-in-the-ass money-wasting scams around).

Went to stay with friends in a town with forced recycling, where they have to separate their stuff into three different kinds of receptacles: yard waste, trash, and recyclables.

On garbage day, they set out trash and recyclables. Two different gigantic noisy trucks made the rounds throughout the neighborhood, and a day or two later, for the yard trash day, another truck made the rounds.

We don't have mandatory recycling. On trash day, once a week, one truck comes through. Seems a lot more environmentally friendly to me.

Side note: in another city where we lived, no recycling, every four or five days we'd set on the curb a gigantic trash bag with empty aluminum cans. Bag never remained on the curb for more than 20 minutes before someone would snag it. Kept the neighborhood clean and earned somebody some easy change.

52 posted on 06/02/2012 11:56:57 PM PDT by Finny ("Raise hell. Vote smart." -- Ted Nugent * By the way, Ted, voting for Romney is voting stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Chickensoup
I don't know if this will help, but it's something to chew on (and KUDOS to you for pursuing the topic. I think recycling is one of the biggest pain-in-the-ass money-wasting scams around).

Went to stay with friends in a town with forced recycling, where they have to separate their stuff into three different kinds of receptacles: yard waste, trash, and recyclables.

On garbage day, they set out trash and recyclables. Two different gigantic noisy trucks made the rounds throughout the neighborhood, and a day or two later, for the yard trash day, another truck made the rounds.

We don't have mandatory recycling. On trash day, once a week, one truck comes through. Seems a lot more environmentally friendly to me.

Side note: in another city where we lived, no recycling, every four or five days we'd set on the curb a gigantic trash bag with empty aluminum cans. Bag never remained on the curb for more than 20 minutes before someone would snag it. Kept the neighborhood clean and earned somebody some easy change.

53 posted on 06/02/2012 11:57:07 PM PDT by Finny ("Raise hell. Vote smart." -- Ted Nugent * By the way, Ted, voting for Romney is voting stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Freedom4US
Pretty colored garbage cans in red and green and yellow, dutifully parsing our waste while trucks drive around and pick it up under various regulations - and fines for putting the cans out two hours before the prescribed hour - that is all statist bullshit and is only possible, if not sane or practical, under a surplus wealth society.

Very well said.

54 posted on 06/03/2012 12:03:02 AM PDT by Finny ("Raise hell. Vote smart." -- Ted Nugent * By the way, Ted, voting for Romney is voting stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Chickensoup

There have been numerous reports (with some article posted on FR) about how durable “Eco-friendly” grocery bags end up carrying weird diseases.


55 posted on 06/03/2012 3:59:59 AM PDT by ctdonath2 ($1 meals: http://abuckaplate.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Freedom4US

One of the collectors in our town is wrapping itself in second PC cause. Their cans are Breastcancer Pink.


56 posted on 06/03/2012 6:40:14 AM PDT by CrazyIvan (Obama's birth certificate was found stapled to Soros's receipt.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Chickensoup

Many years ago Harrisburg, PA built a huge recycling center ($50 million comes to mind but I’m not sure). It never showed a profit.

I think it sets unused now, and IIRC the city is facing bankruptcy, a large part of that being the recycling center.


57 posted on 06/03/2012 7:58:59 AM PDT by Balding_Eagle (Liberals, at their core, are aggressive & dangerous to everyone around them,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Chickensoup
I have also read info like you mention but it was way, way long ago. It said that it cost neighborhoods more to recycle and, in the end, the recycle and regular garbage was dumped in the same dump.

So, neighborhoods paid more to “recycle” everything being dumped in the same dump.

I'll search, but it has been so long since I read the article. Still, I'll search.

58 posted on 06/03/2012 7:59:12 AM PDT by hummingbird (Breitbart and Spartacus: here, there, everywhere.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Chickensoup

Recycling doesn’t work at all, it is a net cost increment without much in the way of offsetting revenues from scrap dealers.

One rule of thumb: Any material that is recycled will be worth less the more of it is recycled. Newspaper is a good example of this.


59 posted on 06/03/2012 11:13:42 AM PDT by buffaloguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: exit82

No one can say that taxpayer subsidy of theft is recycling that works.

____________________

the stuff got to a person who was willing to pay for it...that is the part that worked. I am looking for situations that no one wants the stuff.


60 posted on 06/03/2012 2:21:41 PM PDT by Chickensoup (STOP The Great O-ppression)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson