1. The man lies to state officials about his age 70 years ago.
2. His lie causes a discrepancy in the voter rolls, which the State asks him to explain.
3. The man is offended that the State would ask him to explain the discrepency he himself created because:
A. He is very old, and;
B. He served in WWII.
Neither of which are relevant to the issue. He may or may not be a prick, but his actions are right out of the leftist playbook.
That’s an excellent summation, except you forget one thing:
C. He’s a *decorated* war hero
Which, for some here, makes the guy forevermore immune from any kind of criticism whatsoever, even when the guy’s actions serve to further erode the integrity of our voting system. But then, what does voter integrity matter, when compared to a bronze star won at the Bulge in ‘44!?!?