Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Son House

I understand this completely, however, I heard one economist say that MOST of these labor force dropouts, would have happened anyways, no matter the state of the economy or the president, because it was a large group of aging baby boomers dropping off the rolls.


11 posted on 05/28/2012 10:17:36 AM PDT by Paradox (I want Obama defeated. Period.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Paradox

The Baby Boom of 1946 to 1964 have just started retirement age, the big wave is yet to come.


12 posted on 05/28/2012 11:35:25 AM PDT by Son House (The Economic Boom Heard Around The World => TEA Party 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: Paradox
Well, if the country weren't bankrupt that would be a bright spot for future improvement in unemployment, boomers retiring. Not so hot for residential real estate but a positive for job seekers.

However, retirement age boomers I know aren't retiring because they've had their 401K plans decimated over the past four years and they're afraid Social Security won't last, so they continue to work.

These are all in the private sector, obviously. Public sector has ludicrously plush pensions on top of double dipping and deliberately padded last year earnings to elevate those plush pensions even further away from anything approaching reality, speaking of bankrupt.

It can't end well. It may hold together for years, but there is a reckoning coming.

13 posted on 05/28/2012 11:50:03 AM PDT by RegulatorCountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson