Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Romney’s Big Fat Wet Kiss to Keynesian Economics (RINO Mitt flops back to liberalism alert)
New York Magazine ^ | May 25, 2012 | Jonathan Chait

Posted on 05/26/2012 5:53:09 AM PDT by Zakeet

Not that there's anything wrong with that! Keynes' theories remain the essential guide to understanding recessions.

The real news in Mitt Romney’s interview with Mark Halperin, as Charles Pierce points out, is that Romney openly repudiated the central argument his party has been making against President Obama for the last three years: that he spent too much money and therefore deepened the economic crisis. Indeed Romney himself had been making this very case as recently as a week ago (“he bailed out the public sector, gave billions of dollars to the companies of his friends, and added almost as much debt as all the prior presidents combined. The consequence is that we are enduring the most tepid recovery in modern history.”) But in his Halperin interview, Romney frankly admits that reducing the budget deficit in the midst of an economic crisis would be a horrible idea:

Halperin: You have a plan, as you said, over a number of years, to reduce spending dramatically. Why not in the first year, if you’re elected — why not in 2013, go all the way and propose the kind of budget with spending restraints, that you’d like to see after four years in office? Why not do it more quickly?

Romney: Well because, if you take a trillion dollars for instance, out of the first year of the federal budget, that would shrink GDP over 5%. That is by definition throwing us into recession or depression. So I’m not going to do that, of course.

Of course! Romney says this as if it’s completely obvious that reducing the deficit in the short term would throw the economy back into recession, even though he and his party have been arguing the opposite case with hysterical fervor.

(Excerpt) Read more at nymag.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: economy; keynes; rino; romney; romney4iag; romney4obama; romney4tarp
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last

It didn't take the Rino long to abandon conservatism after his opposition dropped out of the race

1 posted on 05/26/2012 5:53:25 AM PDT by Zakeet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Zakeet

This is shaping up to be 2008 all over again. The lesser of 2 evils. The sad part is if we had a conservative (not Newt) who can make the case and who’s quick enough to counter all the mud that AxelGrease and the DNC will throw at him, he’d be walking away with it.


2 posted on 05/26/2012 5:59:14 AM PDT by YankeeReb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet
Keynes' theories remain the essential guide to understanding recessions.

As long as the powers that be believe this we are doomed. Keynesian 'solutions' have never been applied more enthusiastically than by FDR and Obama. They have resulted in the two worst economic records in the nation's history.

3 posted on 05/26/2012 6:07:15 AM PDT by Paine in the Neck (Socialism consumes everything)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet

The 2012 GOP platform for conservatives: close your eyes, hold your nose, plug your ears, shut your mouth, and turn off your brain.


4 posted on 05/26/2012 6:07:22 AM PDT by Cato in PA (1/26/12: Bloody Thursday)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: YankeeReb

http://www.tomhoefling.com/


5 posted on 05/26/2012 6:07:59 AM PDT by EternalVigilance (Party like it's 1860.- America's Party - www.SelfGovernment.US)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet

You misspelled Kenyan.


6 posted on 05/26/2012 6:08:17 AM PDT by golux
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet
Keynes' theories remain the essential guide to understanding recessions.

No, they don't.
7 posted on 05/26/2012 6:08:55 AM PDT by arderkrag (ABOs are Romneybot trolls. LOOKING FOR ROLEPLAYERS. Check Profile.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet
When you read what Romney actually said in this article, it does not justify the headline. Romney was talking about the rate of deficit reduction. He said that 1 trillion reduction would be too much in a recession. He is probably correct about this.

Romney is not endorsing Keynesian economics here. This is a hit job designed to discourage conservatives (who do not read what he said).

8 posted on 05/26/2012 6:08:55 AM PDT by Blennos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet

“Its the Economy, Stupid”

Oh yeah...


9 posted on 05/26/2012 6:09:27 AM PDT by Tennessee Nana (Why should I vote for Bishop Romney when he hates me because I am a Christian)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Blennos

Surprise, surprise, surprise! A hit job. Who’da thunk it?


10 posted on 05/26/2012 6:11:32 AM PDT by Clara Lou
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet
It didn't take long for the despicable socialist pig to show his true colors.

I will never vote for romney.

11 posted on 05/26/2012 6:12:17 AM PDT by Caipirabob (I say we take off and Newt the site from orbit. It's the only way to be sure...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet

Some of us have seen through Mutt from the beginning. No significant economic change of the type we need will happen in a Romney presidency.

The lesser of two evils is still evil.


12 posted on 05/26/2012 6:14:14 AM PDT by Colonel_Flagg (Obama vs. Romney: Zero x Zero = Zero.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Blennos

I’m glad you pointed this out. The article is deliberately misleading and is a hit job for people who read no further than the headline and first paragraph.


13 posted on 05/26/2012 6:14:33 AM PDT by trubolotta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet

Government spending is false GDP.Real GDP comes only from the private sector.


14 posted on 05/26/2012 6:14:48 AM PDT by CharacterCounts (A vote for the lesser of two evils only insures the triumph of evil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet
Keynes' theories remain the essential guide to understanding recessions.
Just so everyone knows-- Romney didn't say this. The author did.
15 posted on 05/26/2012 6:14:48 AM PDT by Clara Lou
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Caipirabob

You one of those post-before-reading FReepers?


16 posted on 05/26/2012 6:16:13 AM PDT by Clara Lou
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Clara Lou

After all the build up, the actual thing said by Mitt quite underwhelms our expectation that he is going to out himself at any moment as another huge tax and spend liberal. He wants to retire the deficit at a rate more slowly than 5% of GDP per year until the recession is over. And Mitt never says anything about Keynesian economics at all. My what an economic liberal Mitt is!


17 posted on 05/26/2012 6:20:37 AM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Let me ABOs run loose Lou, let me ABOs run loose! They are of much use Lou, so let me ABOs run loose)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck

Romney is my 2nd-to-last choice for POTUS, followed only by Obama. However, this article is a cheap shot, and isn’t worthy of being posted.

Folks who cheer it are Obama-bots.


18 posted on 05/26/2012 6:25:01 AM PDT by Clara Lou
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet

I think we need to embrace Myth and push him to the right.......


19 posted on 05/26/2012 6:30:17 AM PDT by stockpirate (Romney, Ann Coulter & our ruling republican elites, are Big Government socialists, Grand Ole Sociali)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck
Actually, in this and other things I have read, Romney sounds like a timid supply sider.

However, he also likes big government programs, which would seem to contradict his supply side talk. He sounds a lot like a guy places less importance on the philosophy behind a government program than in the person running the program.

20 posted on 05/26/2012 6:35:53 AM PDT by CharacterCounts (A vote for the lesser of two evils only insures the triumph of evil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson