Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bible-era earthquake reveals year of Jesus' crucifixion
Discovery News ^ | May 24, 2012 | Jennifer Viegas

Posted on 05/25/2012 8:42:58 PM PDT by NYFreeper

Jesus, as described in the New Testament, was most likely crucified on Friday April 3, 33 A.D.

The latest investigation, reported in the journal International Geology Review, focused on earthquake activity at the Dead Sea, located 13 miles from Jerusalem. The Gospel of Matthew, Chapter 27, mentions that an earthquake coincided with the crucifixion

Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/scitech/2012/05/24/bible-era-earthquake-reveals-year-jesus-crucifixion/?intcmp=features#ixzz1vwXerfrQ

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society
KEYWORDS: crucifixion; earthquake; godsgravesglyphs; israel; jerusalem; jesus; letshavejerusalem
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-48 next last
Very interesting. I believe Jesus started his 3 year ministry at age 30, so that would make Him 33 when he was crucified. So maybe the calendar makers got it right after all. Since there was no year 0, I suppose that He was born in the year 1 BC. Most so called "experts" don't have Him born in this year.
1 posted on 05/25/2012 8:43:16 PM PDT by NYFreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: NYFreeper

“The Gospel of Matthew, Chapter 27, mentions that an earthquake coincided with the crucifixion”

I wonder if there was an “omen” associated with the earthquake and the crucifixion in those days?


2 posted on 05/25/2012 8:57:07 PM PDT by Parley Baer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYFreeper

Interestingly, the same article has a hyperlink to an article that casts doubt on the Shroud of Turin. In my opinion, that story is slanted against the Shroud. It concludes that since the Shroud is not exactly the same style as another shroud found from the same time, that the Shroud of Turin is not true.

Also, a subsequent and far more thorough analysis of the Shroud, which the hyperlink failed to mention, concluded that the Shroud did date from the time of Jesus.

Lastly, the claim of the main story to be able to pinpoint an earthquake of 2,000 years ago to an exact Friday day and time is highly questionable.


3 posted on 05/25/2012 8:57:26 PM PDT by CdMGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYFreeper

Which brings me to one of my hobby horses:

We already agree that our calendar is wrong, off by anywhere from 2 to 16 years, depending on who’s doing the reckoning, and further in error because of the absence of a year zero.

The more fundamental point is that God did not intend us to mark His years by the birth of Jesus.

If He had intended this we would have a Biblical fixing of the date.

Further, the day of Jesus’ birth is unremarkable as all men are born.

However, very few return from the dead, that event is remarkable, and it is the defining moment of Christianity, the very moment of proof that his sacrifice was not in vain. And the Bible gives a precise reference for when this happened!

Clearly this was the date the calendar was supposed to start!

For extra points, this means our calendar off by 33 years. That makes this 1979 After Resurrection, giving us 22 years to get our affairs in order before the real end of the millennium...


4 posted on 05/25/2012 8:59:06 PM PDT by null and void (Day 1221 of our ObamaVacation from reality [and what dark chill/is gathering still/before the storm])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Parley Baer

Sounds like the earth cried out when the Son of God died.


5 posted on 05/25/2012 8:59:33 PM PDT by doc1019 (Romney will never get my vote!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: NYFreeper

God seems to do things in “Threes”

All will be revealed...soon.


6 posted on 05/25/2012 9:01:47 PM PDT by LtKerst
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYFreeper
Jesus, as described in the New Testament, was most likely crucified on Friday April 3, 33 A.D

If that is the case, when did Jesus rise from the grave?

7 posted on 05/25/2012 9:06:38 PM PDT by fso301
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYFreeper
A celebrated naturalist was once asked to evaluate the definition for "lobster" that a lexicographer had written: "A red fish that walks backwards."

He answered that it was only wrong on three points: It is not red, it is not a fish and it does not walk backwards.

This date for the crucifixion is only wrong on that Jesus was not crucified on a Friday, the third of April, nor on 33ad.

8 posted on 05/25/2012 9:09:07 PM PDT by stormhill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CdMGuy
Lastly, the claim of the main story to be able to pinpoint an earthquake of 2,000 years ago to an exact Friday day and time is highly questionable.

They weren't pinpointing the exact date of the earthquake, only the year. They then deduced the crucifixion date from the date of Passover for that year.

9 posted on 05/25/2012 9:16:29 PM PDT by NYFreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: NYFreeper
The article states only that the Friday Passover date in 33 AD (I'm old fashioned and refuse to use Common Era or CE) of April 3 was the "best match" among possibilities.

I can vouch for the fact that during a tour of the Church of the Holy Sepulcher the guides will (or used to) let you feel down into the rock carved hole legend says held Jesus' cross. There is a noticeable crack in the rock at the base of the hole. Later they take you through a subterranean passage that leads beneath the huge boulder which forms the hill of Golgotha and point to a crack in the stone. Supposedly that crack runs through the boulder and bisects the aforementioned hole.

The guides explain that the earthquake that accompanied Christ's death split Golgotha in two.

10 posted on 05/25/2012 9:17:25 PM PDT by katana (Just my opinions)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYFreeper
http://www.foxnews.com/scitech/2012/05/24/bible-era-earthquake-reveals-year-jesus-crucifixion/?intcmp=features#ixzz1vwXerfrQ ................................................... FRegards
11 posted on 05/25/2012 9:25:41 PM PDT by gonzo ( Buy more ammo, dammit! You should already have the firearms ... FRegards)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYFreeper

Would a solar eclipse be more verifiable as to the time of the crucifixion?


12 posted on 05/25/2012 9:35:29 PM PDT by Redcitizen (New Mexico green chili is the best.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fso301

On the third day, Sunday, April 5, 33 AD.


13 posted on 05/25/2012 9:37:41 PM PDT by NYFreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: fso301

On the third day, Sunday, April 5, 33 AD.


14 posted on 05/25/2012 9:38:14 PM PDT by NYFreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: null and void

“1979”

Making 2012 the beginning of another.


15 posted on 05/25/2012 9:38:44 PM PDT by combat_boots (The Lion of Judah cometh. Hallelujah. Gloria Patri, Filio et Spiritui Sancto.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: fso301; NYFreeper
If that is the case, when did Jesus rise from the grave?

Easter Sunday.

16 posted on 05/25/2012 9:46:35 PM PDT by UCANSEE2 (Lame and ill-informed post)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Redcitizen
Would a solar eclipse be more verifiable as to the time of the crucifixion?

Probably not, since eclipses don't cause a full 3 hours ...from the sixth hour until the ninth hour... of darkness.

17 posted on 05/25/2012 9:53:59 PM PDT by ApplegateRanch (Love me, love my guns!©)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Redcitizen

If it was a solar eclipse, then it would have been truly a miracle. Solar eclipses as we know them can only occur during a new moon. Passover occurs during a full moon.


18 posted on 05/25/2012 10:08:49 PM PDT by NYFreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: fso301

Well, the next day was the Sabbath (Saturday), so they were unable to dress the body with ointments. Therefore, they came back on the next day. That would be Sunday, the third day.


19 posted on 05/25/2012 10:12:56 PM PDT by dangus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: fso301
If that is the case, when did Jesus rise from the grave?

An interesting question indeed, because as Jesus tells us in Matthew 12:40:

For as Jonah was three days and three nights in the belly of the great fish, so will the Son of Man be three days and three nights in the heart of the earth.

The conundrum is left as an exercise to the reader.

20 posted on 05/25/2012 10:19:51 PM PDT by Ackackadack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-48 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson