Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Indiana Senate: Mourdock (R) 42%, Donnelly (D) 42%
Rasmussen Reports ^ | May 25, 2012

Posted on 05/25/2012 4:53:47 PM PDT by Clintonfatigued

Rasmussen Reports’ first look at the U.S. Senate race in Indiana shows Democratic Congressman Joe Donnelly and Tea Party-backed Treasurer Richard Mourdock in a tie.

Both men draw 42% support from Likely Voters in Indiana, according to a new statewide survey. Two percent (2%) prefer some other candidate while 14% are undecided.

(Excerpt) Read more at rasmussenreports.com ...


TOPICS: Politics/Elections; US: Indiana
KEYWORDS: polls

1 posted on 05/25/2012 4:53:56 PM PDT by Clintonfatigued
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: indiana; CommieCutter; ducttape45; nodumbblonde; nascarnation; CORYDON; John W; fieldmarshaldj; ...

This caught me off guard. I expect that Obama will drag Donnelly down, but it’s going to be competitive.


2 posted on 05/25/2012 4:58:34 PM PDT by Clintonfatigued (Obama and Company lied, the American economy died)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued
Romney is dragging Mourdock down ~ he's going to hurt us all across the country in every down ballot race.

The man just doesn't connect with the voters.

3 posted on 05/25/2012 5:04:02 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued

We’re not going to lose this.


4 posted on 05/25/2012 5:12:47 PM PDT by fieldmarshaldj (If you like lying Socialist dirtbags, you'll love Slick Willard)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued

“.....It is important to note that this survey was conducted entirely online. Survey participants were selected at random from an panel provided by a third party.....”
************************************************************
Say what?


5 posted on 05/25/2012 5:31:11 PM PDT by House Atreides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah
Romney is dragging Mourdock down ~ he's going to hurt us all across the country in every down ballot race. The man just doesn't connect with the voters.

Donnelley has the better-sounding last name, and polled at 29% vs Lugar's 50%. Bottom line is that there's a reason RINO's dominate outside of the south - they can win in the general.

6 posted on 05/25/2012 6:00:40 PM PDT by Zhang Fei (Let us pray that peace be now restored to the world and that God will preserve it always.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued

I expected this. There’s no way this race is a slam dunk for the GOP. If Mourdock wins, and votes conservatively, then he could pull a Lugar and be there for years, but he has to win first.


7 posted on 05/25/2012 6:01:02 PM PDT by ducttape45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Zhang Fei
Donnelley has a MINORITY NAME in Indiana. Since the 1850s 43% of the population have been of German origin. Mourdock at least has a name with obvious Saxon relationships.

Regarding winning in Indiana, William Jenner and Homer Capehart won well. Vance Hartke and Birch Bayh won well. Henry Frederick Schricker won as a fusion party candidate (nominated by both Democrats and Republicans).

If you take a very good look at the voting history of all the Indiana politicians with those surnames you'll find they were all much more Conservative than today's TEAParty types, all were very anti-Communist, and all had more than their fair share of Germanic ancestry.

You just imagine Lugar was a RINO ~ he was actually a lifelong Republican.

8 posted on 05/25/2012 6:13:07 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued
I will surrender all hope for Indiana if Joe Donnelly is elected. That guy is astoundingly stupid.
9 posted on 05/25/2012 6:17:23 PM PDT by JoeDonnellymakesmepuke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah
"Henry Frederick Schricker won as a fusion party candidate (nominated by both Democrats and Republicans)."

What ? Gov. Schricker was a Democrat and faced solid GOP opposition in both runs for Governor (for which he barely won in his 1940 race) and against BOTH Sens. Jenner & Capehart in 1944 & 1952 (for which he both lost).

10 posted on 05/25/2012 6:29:00 PM PDT by fieldmarshaldj (If you like lying Socialist dirtbags, you'll love Slick Willard)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: fieldmarshaldj
He lost running for Senate. On the other hand he hardly faced any Republican opposition at all during the period when the Republican party was still engaged in purging the KKK from its ranks.
11 posted on 05/25/2012 6:34:49 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

I don’t know where you got the info that he ran as a “fusion” candidate. About the only person to run as such was Dick Lugar in 2006 when the Democrats didn’t formally field an opponent (surprise, surprise).

When Schricker first ran for Governor in 1940, he won by not even 4,000 votes (49.9-49.7%) over Glenn Hillis. In 1948 running for a second (non-consecutive) term, he got 53.6%, defeating Hobart Creighton. I’d scarcely consider his 1940 race “hardly any opposition.” Hillis’s bigger problem was the liberal Willkie, for whom he opposed (Willard is a lot like Willkie, another liberal Democrat pretending to be a Republican).

Then again, it’s worth pointing out that most IN Gubernatorial contests are never landslide affairs except in two instances... in 1819 when incumbent Jonathan Jennings took a record-setting 81% and not until 1992 when Evan Bayh won his second term with 62% over ex-Atty Gen Linley Pearson. No other time has anyone ever gotten above 60% of the vote.


12 posted on 05/25/2012 6:58:49 PM PDT by fieldmarshaldj (If you like lying Socialist dirtbags, you'll love Slick Willard)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued

Mourdock will win this race by a sizeable margin.


13 posted on 05/25/2012 7:00:52 PM PDT by TonyInOhio (Ave crux spes unica)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fieldmarshaldj

In general, in almost all American competitive elections (including those funny runoffs they used to run in the South) a landslide is somewhere about 53%.


14 posted on 05/25/2012 7:04:25 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah; Clintonfatigued; GOPsterinMA; AuH2ORepublican; randita; fieldmarshaldj; TonyInOhio; ...

Romney is gonna win Indiana. This same pollster has him up 48-42.

Mourdock is gonna win also. That huge undecided must be mostly Lugar fans. They aren’t gonna break for Donnelly.

I don’t want to say the race is “not competitive”, worst case I suppose it could be fairly close but I cannot see Donnelly actually winning. A punk Obama congressman who ran away from a rematch for his House seat over a two term State Treasurer in a Republican state that Obama is gonna lose? No.


15 posted on 05/29/2012 2:29:34 PM PDT by Impy (Don't call me red.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Impy; Clintonfatigued; All
“Romney is gonna win Indiana...”

“Mourdock is gonna win also...”

“A punk Obama congressman who ran away from a rematch for his House seat over a two term State Treasurer in a Republican state that Obama is gonna lose? No.”

Exactly - very well said!!!

16 posted on 05/29/2012 3:28:04 PM PDT by GOPsterinMA (We may die, but DISCO LIVES FOREVER!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Impy
The huge undecided is a problem. As Rush said yesterday, maybe Romney and the GOPe should take note of Wisconsin and realize that a Conservative can win in a landslide ~ whereas a RINO (like Romney) is going to be in nailbiters all over the country, and he can actually lose.

BTW, the Democrats, after seeing how much money can be stuffed down a rathole in the Midwest this year will probably leave Donnelly with nothing but locally generated campaign donations ~ and like this guy is going to do what with what he can get out of Goshen? Do they still have that 12% unemployment rate?

17 posted on 06/07/2012 6:19:44 AM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued

Polls are not truth and these days they are fiction.


18 posted on 06/07/2012 6:29:22 AM PDT by bmwcyle (Romney - not Obama - not a Conservative - not a real Christian)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson