Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

It's the Economy, Stupid
Townhall.com ^ | May 18, 2012 | Scott Rasmussen

Posted on 05/18/2012 4:42:55 AM PDT by Kaslin

Mitt Romney has pulled a point or two ahead of President Obama in polls of likely voters. In polls of registered voters, Obama has the advantage. The president's job approval ratings are hovering in the upper 40 percent range, which suggests a close race.

Looking at this information, partisan activists come to wildly different conclusions about what to expect on Election Day. Democrats tend to believe Obama will be re-elected, while Republicans are more likely to think he will be a one-term president.

Some of this is just the nature of being a fan. Even when your favorite baseball team is down a run with two outs in the ninth, you still think there's a chance.

But something else is at work, as well, and it gets right back to the key issue of the campaign -- the economy. Forget same-sex marriage and the host of other buzz issues. If the economy improves, Obama will be re-elected. If it gets worse, he will lose.

The stock market and economic data are giving mixed signals, but partisans on both sides of the aisle think they know what's going to happen.

Most Democrats (55 percent) believe the economy is getting better. Two out of three Republicans (66 percent) think the economy is getting worse.

The attitudes extend to personal finances, as well. Just 20 percent of Republicans nationwide feel their own finances are getting better, while 53 percent believe the opposite. Democrats are evenly divided on this question.

These wildly differing expectations make sense if you think about the underlying partisan perceptions.

Democrats generally believe a larger government role is needed to help get the economy moving. They support the president's policies, including his health care plan. Some may be surprised that the benefits of his policies haven't kicked in yet. Others may believe that he needed an even bigger plan of government involvement to really jumpstart the economy. But 74 percent of Democrats think the president has done a good or an excellent job handling the economy.

Republicans tend to see the government as a burden that is weighing down the economy. They view the president's health care plan as a nightmare and the increase in spending during the Obama years as a disaster. Seventy-eight percent of Republicans feel the president is doing a poor job handling the economy.

Put it all together, and Democrats are confident of victory in November because they believe the economy will be better by then. To them, it's just a question of time before the benefits of the president's policies become visible. Republicans hold the opposite view. For both sides, if they are right about the economy, they are right about the election.

More precisely, of course, it's perceptions of the economy that matter. Since both party's voters will support their own nominee, it will come down to how voters not affiliated with either party view the economic situation.

Currently, 31 percent of unaffiliated voters believe the economy is getting better, while 48 percent think it's getting worse. When it comes to their own finances, 22 percent say they are improving, but 48 percent say they're not.

As for the president, 30 percent of unaffiliated voters believe he is doing a good job handling the economy. Forty-nine percent give him poor marks in this area. These are the numbers Team Obama needs to change if it wants to win in November.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Editorial; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 05/18/2012 4:42:57 AM PDT by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

It’s everything about this communist POS.


2 posted on 05/18/2012 5:00:48 AM PDT by ETL (ALL (most?) of the Obama-commie connections at my FR Home page: http://www.freerepublic.com/~etl/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
"If the economy improves, Obama will be re-elected. If it gets worse, he will lose."

What Rasmussen totally misses in this analysis is the influence the media is attempting to have on the perception of the state of the economy. The legacy media is in a full court press to produce only good economic news, even in this state of dismal economic malaise. The question to me is not how the economy is doing, but how effective they will be in pulling this deception off.

3 posted on 05/18/2012 5:09:09 AM PDT by norwaypinesavage (Galileo: In science, the authority of a thousand is not worth the humble reasoning of one individual)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: norwaypinesavage
You wrote: "The legacy media is in a full court press to produce only good economic news, even in this state of dismal economic malaise. The question to me is not how the economy is doing, but how effective they will be in pulling this deception off."

I think you're spot on. The facts will not play large in this election. The most important thing is how effective the media will be in influencing the average uninformed voter.
4 posted on 05/18/2012 5:52:13 AM PDT by Dan in Wichita
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Economy stupid ?

How about a ME that is ready to explode

How about a Supreme Court one justice away from total destruction of our liberties

How about a major terrorist hit that sends everything in the country into turmoil


5 posted on 05/18/2012 5:57:43 AM PDT by uncbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: norwaypinesavage
The question to me is not how the economy is doing, but how effective they will be in pulling this deception off.

I've been wondering about this lately, and I thinking the answer is that they will be thoroughly ineffective. While people will probably hear the unemployment number drop below 8% (and the media will never mention that is the level 0 was going to save us from in the first place) how much is that really going to influence people who know someone out of work, haven't gotten a raise, have seen food and gas prices rising, work in jobs where they have reduced positions and are expected to do more with less, couldn't sell their house if they wanted to, etc?

And they can push the whole "we just need to do MORE" Paul Krugman nonsense all they want, or perhaps "it would have been so much worse". IMO, the American public has little patience, and four years is long enough that they'll be ready to give someone else a try. Too bad it's Romney.

6 posted on 05/18/2012 7:24:52 AM PDT by Darth Reardon (No offense to drunken sailors)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson