Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Truth About Homosexuality
The New American ^ | 17 May 2012 | Selwyn Duke

Posted on 05/17/2012 8:43:32 AM PDT by Paladins Prayer

According to modern dogma, homosexuals are like sprinters: born and not made. Thus, even though psychology’s longstanding nature-nurture debate has concluded that many traits are the result of both factors, it isn’t politically correct to consider even this possibility with respect to homosexuality. But does this biology-is-destiny theory hold water with respect to same-sex attraction? And, if so, what does this say about the behavior’s moral status? Let’s examine the matter.

When discussing same-sex attraction’s cause, the first thing usually mentioned is the much touted “homosexual gene” theory. In fact, the idea has been repeated so often that many today accept it as fact. But the reality is this: Neither the groundbreaking Genome Project nor any other research endeavor has found any such gene. Moreover, it makes no sense from an evolutionary (or selective breeding, if you prefer) standpoint. After all, such a gene would greatly reduce the chances of its bearer procreating, would be unlikely to be passed on, and thus would be a dead-end mutation unable to survive many generations. And, I must say, it’s a testimonial to the emotion-oriented decision-making of secular modernists — who are generally staunch evolutionists — that they would glom on to a theory so contrary to Evolution 101.

Next we have the intrauterine development theory. It states that if a boy’s body fails to provide him with the necessary amount of testosterone in the womb, his brain won’t be fully masculinized. This, presumably, accounts for that rare boy we’ve all met who, from the word go, has very effeminate mannerisms. Anyway, the idea is that his more feminine brain will militate in favor of attraction to other males. It’s a logical theory, as far as it goes.

Yet it isn’t airtight.

(Excerpt) Read more at thenewamerican.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; Philosophy
KEYWORDS: gay; gaymarriage; gene; homosexualagenda; homosexuality; homosexuallinks; kenyanbornmuzzie; obama; swrdswllwngsdshw; thenewamerican
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051 next last
This is another brilliant article on homosexuality. It really blows all the left's argument's out of the water.
1 posted on 05/17/2012 8:43:36 AM PDT by Paladins Prayer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Paladins Prayer

Well, if it is genetic, then the homosexuals we have now are not reproducing. Therefore, this gene should disappear from the gene pool.


2 posted on 05/17/2012 8:55:53 AM PDT by proxy_user
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paladins Prayer

3 posted on 05/17/2012 8:57:05 AM PDT by Jeff Chandler (The best diplomat I know is a fully-activated phaser bank. - Montgomery Scott)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paladins Prayer; ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas; stephenjohnbanker; DoughtyOne; calcowgirl; Gilbo_3; ...
Nice article critical of the 'theory' that Gays (LGBT) are a special biological class of humans who deserve special civil rights, an assumption that now is treated like dogma.

IN the evolution versus creation(ID) debate the former argues that evolution theory is predictive.

But if these lib psychologists (pseudo-scientsists) are right and ‘sexual orientation’ (ie physical attraction) is determined before birth then they should be able to predict exactly which flavor of 'Gay' the child will become when they get older.

The flavors are :

GL=gay/lesbian
B=bisexual
T=transsexual

Tell us which one it will be.

4 posted on 05/17/2012 9:00:27 AM PDT by sickoflibs (Romney is a liberal. Just watch him closely try to screw us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paladins Prayer

“As to this, I remember reading an explanation an anonymous pedophile used to justify his behavior (I’m paraphrasing): “I didn’t ask to have these feelings, so what do you want me to do?””

In 10 years, continuing down our immoral path, this will be as common as homosexuality.
The author has nailed it, but no one wants to think, they just want to do what feels good.


5 posted on 05/17/2012 9:02:36 AM PDT by No_More_Harkin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paladins Prayer
The truth is homosexuality is a behavior, it is not a condition, race or gender, etc. Smoking, lying, scratching myself are also behaviors. The libs want us to focus on the cause and not the discussion of whether it is an appropriate behavior.

Human behaviors are complex like we used to learn in behavioral psychology. I think imprinting is one of the major causes of homosexual behavior.

Another thought, how do you know someone is homosexual? You either observe the behavior or they self identify?

6 posted on 05/17/2012 9:03:26 AM PDT by PeterPrinciple (Lord, save me from some conservatives, they don't understand history any better than liberals.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paladins Prayer

Agreed - side note: I have at least 4 male ,married, heterosexual friends who have effeminate mannerisms yet are not in the least homosexual. Second, related note: interesting that the show “Suburgatory” has two male characters who have flamingly, over-the-top effeminate mannerisms yet have not been portrayed as “in-the-closet” types and are married to women. The joke appears to be that they just don’t recognize their own homosexuality, but given my personal experience (above), I’m taking it that they’re just very effeminate.


7 posted on 05/17/2012 9:03:34 AM PDT by jagusafr ("Write in Palin and prepare for war...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: proxy_user
Not necessarily as the gene could be recessive. Still, science doesn't support the born that way theory and is actually quite hostile to the idea. Science tells us environment is a major factor in determining our sexuality.
8 posted on 05/17/2012 9:06:11 AM PDT by scripter ("You don't have a soul. You are a soul. You have a body." - C.S. Lewis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Paladins Prayer

THanks for the article.

You can make the case that sin of ALL kinds are in our DNA!

EVERYTHING we do is a choice. We either give in to the material momentums and lusts of the flesh, or we are disciplined in the Way of our Lord and His teaching and do not engage in behaviors which He has told us are harmful.


9 posted on 05/17/2012 9:06:27 AM PDT by TEXOKIE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paladins Prayer
This, presumably, accounts for that rare boy we’ve all met who, from the word go, has very effeminate mannerisms.

This reminds me... there are actually more effeminate heterosexual men than homosexual men.

10 posted on 05/17/2012 9:09:46 AM PDT by scripter ("You don't have a soul. You are a soul. You have a body." - C.S. Lewis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paladins Prayer

80% of gays were sexually abused as minors.

Prove me wrong.


11 posted on 05/17/2012 9:10:34 AM PDT by G Larry (Criminals thrive on the indulgence of society's understanding)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: scripter

That is a canard....no way.


12 posted on 05/17/2012 9:14:27 AM PDT by wardaddy (I am a social conservative. My political party left me(again). They can go to hell in a bucket.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Paladins Prayer
I firmly believe that gayness is a choice, that is sometimes influenced by factors such as childhood exposure, molestation, etc. As the author points out, the idea of a gay gene is conpletely contrary to the evolutionary theory that leftists hold so dear. Clearly this unfounded notion of a gay gene is an attempt to sway people who don't know better into thinking that queer is normal.

Whenever people say "He/she/they was born gay! its normal!" The correct response is, "Some people are born with 11 toes, or three gonads. Still not normal."

Regards,

Cope

13 posted on 05/17/2012 9:15:21 AM PDT by Copenhagen Smile
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: G Larry
80% of gays were sexually abused as minors.

And . . . therefore, what? A lot of people were physically abused by beatings as minors. So what? A lot of people had drunk parents. So what?

Homosexuality is a "Character and Behavior Disorder" no matter what the psychological world says, similar to being an alcoholic, thief, gambler, etc., all of which deserve therapy, either religious, secular, or both. But to pat them on the back is insane.

14 posted on 05/17/2012 9:18:19 AM PDT by laweeks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Paladins Prayer

“...very effeminate mannerisms. Anyway, the idea is that his more feminine brain will militate in favor of attraction to other males.”

For a moment, I thought this was going to be another Obama tread.


15 posted on 05/17/2012 9:18:22 AM PDT by pallis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: G Larry

80% of gays were sexually abused as minors.

My son is a homosexual. I have not seen him in 10 years.
You should hear the stories he makes up about our family!
They have no basis in reality and are only created to justify his behavior.
These guys hang out together and feed on each other’s tales of abuse, and lose their grip on reality.


16 posted on 05/17/2012 9:21:41 AM PDT by WestwardHo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: WestwardHo

Oh. I’m sorry to hear that. The fact that you haven’t seen your son in 10 years must be heartbreaking.


17 posted on 05/17/2012 9:26:27 AM PDT by babyfreep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Paladins Prayer

I read somewhere that 1% of live births have both male and female genetalia. I think this explains the bull dyke. It probably accounts for a large percentage of the 1.8% of the population that is gay. The remainder have some form of psychosis.


18 posted on 05/17/2012 9:26:40 AM PDT by KMG365
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paladins Prayer

All one needs to know about homosexuality is that it is Halakhically a capital offense for all mankind. ‘Nuff said.


19 posted on 05/17/2012 9:29:14 AM PDT by Zionist Conspirator (Ki-hagoy vehamamlakhah 'asher lo'-ya`avdukh yove'du; vehagoyim charov yecheravu!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Chandler

How about when he prances down the steps of Air Force One with his little paws clenched up close to his chest!!


20 posted on 05/17/2012 9:29:25 AM PDT by LADY J (You never know how strong you are until being strong is the only choice you have. - Author Unknown)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Paladins Prayer

Very powerful article. The fact that it’s in “The New American” means that the people who really need to see it will probably not or they will selectively ignore it. :-(

I especially like the last paragraph where it says, “...it’s self-evident that a choice is involved in any behavior; to deny this is to deny free will and reduce man to an animal.”


21 posted on 05/17/2012 9:29:40 AM PDT by babyfreep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: proxy_user

Great military Quote

“When I joined the military it was illegal to be homosexual, then it became Optional, and now it’s Legal.

I’m getting out before Our Commander & Chief makes it mandatory.”

GySgt Harry Berres, USMC


22 posted on 05/17/2012 9:30:59 AM PDT by Dusty Road
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: G Larry
80% of gays were sexually abused as minors.

Prove me wrong.

I don't know about the % but a good point. How do the born gay people explain the connection between the normal child victims of homosexual pedos and how many become gay later?

23 posted on 05/17/2012 9:40:47 AM PDT by fungoking (Tis a pleasure to live in the Ozarks)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Paladins Prayer
When it’s said that homosexuality is a “choice,” what should really be said is that homosexual behavior is a choice. No thinking traditionalist would claim that a person chooses to have homosexual feelings, whether inborn or induced by circumstance.

As an unquestionably heterosexual male, I have ALWAYS argued that I was hard-wired at birth coax cute 14 year-old girls into the sack and have my way with them. I don't, never have, and never will . . . because it is MORALLY WRONG!!! Behavior, to include the practice of same-sex relations, is a behavioral choice.

24 posted on 05/17/2012 9:42:10 AM PDT by RatRipper (I'll ride a turtle to work every day before I buy anything from Government Motors.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jagusafr
4 male ,married, heterosexual friends who have effeminate mannerisms

Mrs. WBill has been going to her hairdresser for 20-odd years. He fits the "gay stereotype" to a T. Right down to the fact that he designs and builds tiaras as a hobby (built one for my wife, as a wedding present).

In contrast to all of the stereotypes, he's married to a scorching hot gorgeous blonde, and they have 5 kids together.

Go figure.

25 posted on 05/17/2012 9:48:16 AM PDT by wbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Paladins Prayer
According to modern dogma, homosexuals are like sprinters: born and not made.

I agree with the dogma, in a sense. I know a nationally competitive sprinter who started with a huge amount of natural talent and then trained hard and practiced to get to the top. The siblings had runner's bodies and could probably run well if they wanted, but none took up the sport. The question is: Are you a sprinter just because you have potential, or do you actually have to get out there and run to be a sprinter. Most of the family I have in mind chose not to run. Is homosexuality any different - you're born with or without some tendency in that direction, but then you make a choice?

26 posted on 05/17/2012 9:49:37 AM PDT by Pollster1 (“A boy becomes a man when a man is needed.” - John Steinbeck)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WestwardHo

My sister in law was a full blown bull dyke. but that wasn’t enough. Her girlfriend was a multi-minority (race/religious). The world revolved around “Gay”. There was not one subject that she did not steer to ‘gay’. It was impossible to have a rational conversation with her.

She also existed solely to create problems for everyone she came in contact with. I could go on typing for literally days and not touch a fraction of the damage she did.

And suddenly, one day, here girlfriend decided she, militant lesbian, was straight, dropped my SIL and went o her merry way. My SIL then determined that she too was straight and got a boyfriend, dropped her gay friends like a hot potatoE and found a whole new way to fantasize her past away.

Homosexuality is a mental disorder. It always has been and a bunch of homosexual doctors owning the psych board do not change the reality of that fact. We will live with the damage of the mainstreaming of homosexuality for a LONG time.

That said, I once had a friend who was homosexual. He was a very good person in a number of ways. I had to make a choice between that friendship and what I believe. I miss him but I refuse to play the ‘gay id OK’ game.


27 posted on 05/17/2012 9:49:37 AM PDT by Norm Lenhart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: laweeks

And therefore their hommosexuality is a behavioral response to the abuse, and NOTHING to do with genetic factors.


28 posted on 05/17/2012 9:57:57 AM PDT by G Larry (Criminals thrive on the indulgence of society's understanding)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: wardaddy
I reference a study on the subject here: Homosexual Agenda: Categorical Index of Links (Revision 1.1). I can't remember from where the study came but I'm thinking it came from Harvard. I'll try to find it later.
29 posted on 05/17/2012 10:05:20 AM PDT by scripter ("You don't have a soul. You are a soul. You have a body." - C.S. Lewis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Paladins Prayer
It must be a choice! HIV is a known life-threatening disease. Ways to avoid it are well known. Yet, some choose to live the gay life style & also choose to ignore the ways to prevent getting the disease.

If they choose to use free will to avoid getting such a devastating disease - then I believe they also have the ability to choose not to be gay at all.

30 posted on 05/17/2012 10:14:44 AM PDT by LADY J (You never know how strong you are until being strong is the only choice you have. - Author Unknown)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: scripter

you are certainly up on it given your homepage and i applaud your diligence

but my own in depth experience knowing many from mid teens up and even once caring for a terminally ill homosexual the past half century gives me practical experience otherwise

i am ambivalent on the nature nurture argument

i don;t think anyone can say with total authority one way or the other 100%

i do know we are much of what we are born...far more than behavioralists like to think

just watching my 5 kids

but even if there is some nature to it that doesn’t justify it

it is my nature to screw around...i just relish women physically ...no question...that would not justify it if I did

character keeps the satyr in check...as it should


31 posted on 05/17/2012 10:20:50 AM PDT by wardaddy (I am a social conservative. My political party left me(again). They can go to hell in a bucket.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: sickoflibs; ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas; stephenjohnbanker
Tell us which one it will be.

in the realm of homo-evolution, my scientific theory would be... 'extinct' ???

why is it that all the prog/comm ideals are so obviously contradictory and yet they still manage to convince the majority of dumbasses to commit national suicide ???

32 posted on 05/17/2012 10:25:19 AM PDT by Gilbo_3 (Gov is not reason; not eloquent; its force.Like fire,a dangerous servant & master. George Washington)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Paladins Prayer

IMO, some homosexuals are born that way, and others, who as children experiencd horrible abuse and neglect, are not.


33 posted on 05/17/2012 10:31:14 AM PDT by GSWarrior
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paladins Prayer

Can you explain what you think he means by the use of the word “sprinters” in this line? I don’t understand this usage of that word at all:

“Well, consider that the same psychologists who may claim that homosexuality is inborn will also usually say that sociopaths are sprinters, too.”


34 posted on 05/17/2012 10:32:32 AM PDT by RightFighter (It was all for nothing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RightFighter

That relates to the first line, where he writes “According to modern dogma, homosexuals are like sprinters: born and not made.”

So it means that it’s said that sociopaths are born and not made.


35 posted on 05/17/2012 10:36:44 AM PDT by Paladins Prayer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: sickoflibs

Remember, Rush said if a gay gene is ever found abortion would be outlawed.


36 posted on 05/17/2012 10:46:00 AM PDT by taterjay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Gilbo_3
why is it that all the prog/comm ideals are so obviously contradictory and yet they still manage to convince the majority of dumbasses to commit national suicide

Good question. In my mind it comes down to herd instinct. It's just easier for some to go with the flow created by the vocal minorities. Combine that with the left's genuine brilliance in amplifying their influence through smoke and mirrors, and you have an opportunity for a real lemming fest.

37 posted on 05/17/2012 10:59:29 AM PDT by Springfield Reformer (Winston Churchill: No Peace Till Victory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Gilbo_3

” why is it that all the prog/comm ideals are so obviously contradictory and yet they still manage to convince the majority of dumbasses to commit national suicide ??? “

We should give homos their own country, and let them become extinct.


38 posted on 05/17/2012 11:20:43 AM PDT by stephenjohnbanker (God, family, country, mom, apple pie, the girl next door and a Ford F250 to pull my boat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: laweeks; G Larry

I think an “all-of-the-above” model for understanding the genesis of homosexual behavior has better explanatory power than just focusing on only one area, such as abuse.

“Generally, the histories of men engaging in same-sex behaviors reveal a history of cumulative problems: significant peer rejection, low self-esteem, a distant father, an overprotective or controlling mother, victimization by bullies, or sexual abuse. Fortunately these conflicts can be resolved, and the masculine identity can be strengthened and then embraced. “
Richard P. Fitzgibbons, M.D., available at http://narth.com/docs/fitz.html

In general, NARTH (http://narth.com/) is a pretty good resource for info on GID (Gender. Identity Disorder). And I don’t think it’s problematic to recognize it as a disorder. Being a disorder does not put it outside the moral, decisional realm. Quite the opposite. For a wide range of disorders, therapeutic solutions that work well consistently require the patient to make life-changing choices about their behavior. But recognizing potential root causes empowers the therapist and the patient to locate and lock onto those decisional behaviors most likely to bring about real healing, and that’s all good.


39 posted on 05/17/2012 11:35:10 AM PDT by Springfield Reformer (Winston Churchill: No Peace Till Victory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Paladins Prayer

ping for later


40 posted on 05/17/2012 11:37:27 AM PDT by mick (Central Banker Capitalism is NOT Free Enterprise)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paladins Prayer
Geez - talk about a disconnected metaphor.
41 posted on 05/17/2012 11:38:02 AM PDT by RightFighter (It was all for nothing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Gilbo_3; ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas; stephenjohnbanker
RE:”why is it that all the prog/comm ideals are so obviously contradictory and yet they still manage to convince the majority of dumbasses to commit national suicide ???””

I have been covertly sampling peoples opinions around here and have come to the conclusions that most people are clueless. 20 years ago they had an excuse which was limited information sources, but now that they all have internet and many have it on their phones that excuse goes away.

I cant tell you how many people just believe what the politician in charge claims(better if it's something they want to believe), or whatever the News says, even those who vote for the other party.

Ask Republicans in work or neighborhood what Citizens United was about and most will just repeat what Obama said, and, maybe argue against that.

42 posted on 05/17/2012 12:03:22 PM PDT by sickoflibs (Romney is a liberal. Just watch him closely try to screw us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: sickoflibs

I think it comes down to a couple things. For the younger set. Logic and critical thought have been eliminated from ciriculum from K-PHD level. A populace unable to form a critical thought is open to anything fed them.

Second, most people are in fact willfully ignorant to ‘get along’. They seek to avoid conflict at any price. To get along with co-workers/friends/family/teachers et all. There is also fear for their jobs/grades to consider in this category.

As nuts as it sounds, the perfect (IMO) summation of this situation was a line by Tommy Lee Jones in the original Men in Black movie. Yes, it’s a dumb movie, but the quote itself has a profound truth at it’s core.

“A person is smart. People are dumb, panicky, dangerous animals, and you know it. 1500 years ago, everybody knew that the Earth was the center of the universe. 500 years ago, everybody knew that the Earth was flat. And 15 minutes ago, you knew that people were alone on this planet. Imagine what you’ll know tomorrow.”


43 posted on 05/17/2012 12:15:44 PM PDT by Norm Lenhart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Norm Lenhart

I get the point, Norm, but in a way the quote is emblematic of the problem. First, even 500 years ago educated Europeans knew that the world wasn’t flat. Secondly, the Earth very well could be the center of the Universe because we don’t know where the Universe’s boundaries are.

So my point it, while the quote makes a point about ignorance, it does so in two ways - one of which is unintentional. Because it was formulated by someone who fell victim to myth/revisionist history and who exhibited a failure to think a matter through thoroughly, it reflects ignorance itself.


44 posted on 05/17/2012 12:40:02 PM PDT by Paladins Prayer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: sickoflibs; Gilbo_3; ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas; Norm Lenhart

” I cant tell you how many people just believe what the politician in charge claims(better if it’s something they want to believe), or whatever the News says, even those who vote for the other party.”

Leaves everything wide open for evil to flourish.


45 posted on 05/17/2012 12:53:40 PM PDT by stephenjohnbanker (God, family, country, mom, apple pie, the girl next door and a Ford F250 to pull my boat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Paladins Prayer

Sure a few people knew. But the context is the general population following the herd based solely on what the crowd thinks.

The crowd believe gay marriage is good, ergo it must be the truth.

The crowd believes in global warming so it must be the truth.

The crowd believes the earth was flat...except it isnt. Likewise for many ‘crowdsourced’ and self perpetuating bits of ‘fact’. The whole self-fulfilling prophecy thing. That’s all I’m getting at and IMO the point of the quote.


46 posted on 05/17/2012 1:00:02 PM PDT by Norm Lenhart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Norm Lenhart

I’m not criticizing you, Norm. And as I said, I got the point of the quote. My only point is that a lot of people believe silly things like “everyone” 500 years ago thought the world was flat. And what bothers me is part of the reason why people believe these things: it is another way that liberals discredit Christianity (Ooh, look what people believed when Christianity reigned).

A lot of what people believe about the Middle Ages simply isn’t true.


47 posted on 05/17/2012 1:05:11 PM PDT by Paladins Prayer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Paladins Prayer

I don’t think you’re criticizing me at all. Nor I you. It just seemed like we were going in different directions. My bad ;)


48 posted on 05/17/2012 1:11:08 PM PDT by Norm Lenhart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Paladins Prayer

People just don’t want to pay public welfare benefits for two lunatics sodding off all day.

Muslims would just kill homosexuals.

Taking into consideration broken clocks tell the correct time twice each day, maybe “spread the other cheek” is not a good public policy.

In your unabridged Oxford Dictionaries, the word “faggotry” denotes the bundling of steel to be hammered or rolled together.

Mammalian evolution is entirely heterosexual.

 Monogamy is not required for evolution, monogamy is a tenet of religion.

To prohibit polyandry and polygyny is an ecclesiastic rule of law.

To establish an ecclesiastic standard of monogamy for homosexuals is nothing but RELIGIOUS FAGGOTRY.

Democrats live in a fantasy world where fairies wave magic wands over their anus and babies materialize out of thin air.

All men are born of a woman.

If you have to tell grown men that babies will not come out of their rectums, there is no hope for any rational discourse...


49 posted on 05/18/2012 4:28:30 AM PDT by Sir Francis Dashwood ("Arjuna, why have you have dropped your bow???")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: proxy_user

born gay = birth defect

(They hate that.)


50 posted on 05/18/2012 4:30:12 AM PDT by Sir Francis Dashwood ("Arjuna, why have you have dropped your bow???")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson