Skip to comments.
Hillary: ‘Government Cannot and Should Not Control Any Individual's Life’
CNSNews ^
Posted on 05/16/2012 5:07:59 PM PDT by Sub-Driver
Hillary: Government Cannot and Should Not Control Any Individual's Life By Pete Winn May 16, 2012
(CNSNews.com) - Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, told an assemblage of human rights and civil society activists gathered at the State Department Wednesday that government cannot and should not control the lives of individuals.
(T)o make the case for civil society is really quite simple because government cannot and should not control any individuals life tell you what to do, what not to do, Clinton said, taking part in a Global Dialogue of Civil Society.
Clinton said that any sustainable society must have three legs to stand on: an accountable government, a free-market economy, and civil society.
The economy has to be in the hands of those who are the entrepreneurs and creative innovators, she said. But it is in civil society where we live our lives. Thats where our families are formed; thats where our faith is practiced. Thats where we become who we are, through voluntary activities, through standing up for our common humanity. And so, as we see the explosion of civil society groups around the world, we want to support you.
Civil Society is a buzzword for U.S. efforts to bring social change and democracy to countries of the world by working with civil society activists around the world.
Clinton drew on her own experience as a social activist to illustrate what the U.S. supports.
I started my career working in civil society, she said.
(Excerpt) Read more at cnsnews.com ...
TOPICS: Culture/Society; Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: hillaryclinton; hillaryhypocrisy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-50, 51-68 next last
No comment. Instead I'll have another drink.........
To: Sub-Driver
To: Sub-Driver
Sounds like Hillary isn’t into ObarryCare.
3
posted on
05/16/2012 5:10:24 PM PDT
by
FlingWingFlyer
(Dumb, dependent and Democrat is no way to go through life. - Rep. Louie Gohmert (R-Texas)
To: Sub-Driver
4
posted on
05/16/2012 5:10:32 PM PDT
by
GeronL
(The Right to Life came before the Right to Pursue Happiness)
To: Sub-Driver
5
posted on
05/16/2012 5:10:51 PM PDT
by
tomkat
(:^)
To: Sub-Driver
Too bad she doesn’t believe this.
6
posted on
05/16/2012 5:11:08 PM PDT
by
freekitty
(Give me back my conservative vote; then find me a real conservative to vote for)
To: Sub-Driver; a fool in paradise
No way Hildegarde could of said that, all the “uhms” and “you knows” are missing!
To: Sub-Driver
I started my career working in cattle futures, she said.
8
posted on
05/16/2012 5:12:20 PM PDT
by
tet68
( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)
To: GeronL
wow. the hypocrisy.Hillary: I was so much older then, I'm younger than that now.....
Then:

Now:
9
posted on
05/16/2012 5:16:10 PM PDT
by
EGPWS
(Trust in God, question everyone else)
To: Jim Robinson
Here she comes...
Just shocks the hell out of me.
10
posted on
05/16/2012 5:17:42 PM PDT
by
Carry_Okie
(The RNC would prefer Obama to a conservative nominee.)
To: Sub-Driver
Sounds to me like she is campaigning for the big ticket...say what the people want to hear and all.
It's not too late for a Clinton/Wasserman-Schultz ticket, ya know?
But it is too late to be the first gay POTUS...shame.
11
posted on
05/16/2012 5:19:28 PM PDT
by
IrishPennant
(Are you behind a "Blade of Grass?")
To: Sub-Driver
.....so she’s going to run against Obama?
12
posted on
05/16/2012 5:19:33 PM PDT
by
cblue55
To: Carry_Okie
If this surprises you, raise your hand.
13
posted on
05/16/2012 5:20:16 PM PDT
by
Lurker
(Violence is rarely the answer. But when it is it is the only answer.)
To: Sub-Driver
What she means by "life" is what they do with their sex organs.
Everything else should be under government control, especially their earnings and property.
14
posted on
05/16/2012 5:22:13 PM PDT
by
E. Pluribus Unum
(Do I really need a sarcasm tag? Seriously? You're that dense?)
To: cblue55
... or replace bumblin Joe Biden.
15
posted on
05/16/2012 5:24:11 PM PDT
by
skeeter
To: Sub-Driver
Government should not control individual lives.
Unless, of course, the individual lives are unwanted. Then it is dandy to kill them with tax dollars.
16
posted on
05/16/2012 5:24:54 PM PDT
by
garjog
To: Sub-Driver

have another drink stooopid...
17
posted on
05/16/2012 5:25:11 PM PDT
by
Chode
(American Hedonist - *DTOM* -ww- NO Pity for the LAZY)
To: Chode
Look at those MAN HANDS!
18
posted on
05/16/2012 5:27:56 PM PDT
by
Baynative
(REMEMBER: Without America there is no free world!)
To: Sub-Driver
How can people look you straight in the face and tell you a lie—when they know, that you know, that it’s a lie.
19
posted on
05/16/2012 5:28:12 PM PDT
by
Venturer
To: skeeter
No - she goes big or stays home...Look at her tricky dick hubby out stumping for the purple lipped prince while at the same time trashing Obamastan's economics...
the C'toons are up to something and I am thinking - really thinking since Obizmal is tanking, Soros is taking a time out and sending in the subs...
20
posted on
05/16/2012 5:28:34 PM PDT
by
IrishPennant
(Are you behind a "Blade of Grass?")
To: Lurker
If this surprises you, raise your hand. There's no other explanation for all the "Democrats fear Zero is unelectable" stories we've been seeing lately. The Bamster is doing the Slave Party equivalent of the RINO swan dive, on cue. I can't see Romnuts doing anything but taking a political powder under the circumstances. From 'first black President' to 'first woman President,' here we come. Sorry ladies, but I'm afraid that there are just too many women who would get all tingly about this for a squishy RINO pulling his punches in the name of chivalry to overcome. Hence, the media game will be to start by playing up 'Romney is mean.' He'll respond by trying to prove he's 'a nice guy.' Game over.
21
posted on
05/16/2012 5:28:39 PM PDT
by
Carry_Okie
(The RNC would prefer Obama to a conservative nominee.)
To: Sub-Driver
Oh, really? This, from the woman who said “We’re going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good” in June of 2004?
To: Sub-Driver
Uh... did she run this by Premier Hussein?
There’s a definite difference of opinion (and policy) there.
To: Carry_Okie
24
posted on
05/16/2012 5:31:04 PM PDT
by
Lurker
(Violence is rarely the answer. But when it is it is the only answer.)
To: Sub-Driver
Hillary proves life is so much easier when you forget what you’ve done in the past.
25
posted on
05/16/2012 5:31:57 PM PDT
by
Secret Agent Man
(I can neither confirm or deny that; even if I could, I couldn't - it's classified.)
To: Baynative

oh yeah...
26
posted on
05/16/2012 5:42:12 PM PDT
by
Chode
(American Hedonist - *DTOM* -ww- NO Pity for the LAZY)
To: Sub-Driver
27
posted on
05/16/2012 5:42:38 PM PDT
by
Servant of the Cross
(the Tea Party movement: more obstinate, unyielding and hostile to Democrats Â…)
To: Carry_Okie
Sorry ladies, but I'm afraid that there are just too many women who would get all tingly about this for a squishy RINO pulling his punches in the name of chivalry to overcome. Hence, the media game will be to start by playing up 'Romney is mean.' He'll respond by trying to prove he's 'a nice guy.' Game over. One problem with your scenario.
If the Democrat party gives the boot to "the first black president" -- in favor of "the first womean president" -- they will lose the black vote. Forever.
And, if the Democrat Party can't command 90% of the black vote, they will never win another election.
28
posted on
05/16/2012 5:44:54 PM PDT
by
okie01
To: crosshairs
Translation: I’m gay, give me your children.
29
posted on
05/16/2012 5:46:01 PM PDT
by
donna
(The fruits of Feminism: Angry fathers, bitter mothers, fat kids and political correctness.)
To: Sub-Driver
(T)o make the case for civil society is really quite simple because government cannot and should not control any individuals life tell you what to do, what not to do, Clinton said, taking part in a Global Dialogue of Civil Society.
Guffaw! A disciple of Alynski. What an odd, incongruous thing to say in a discussion of civil society. She's never believed that. With every fiber of her being, she has always lived and breathed as an unadulterated statist. A true believer. A subtle dance to the right during an election year? Trying to sound more centrist? Somebody contemplating an 11th-hour run for Pres?
30
posted on
05/16/2012 5:46:19 PM PDT
by
PowderMonkey
(WILL WORK FOR AMMO)
To: Sub-Driver
It means something entirely different when she says it.
Conservatives: Gov't should not make laws to take away my freedom, property and livelihood.
Liberals: Gov't should not make laws to curtail abortions, food stamps, handouts, benefits, affirmative action etc.
31
posted on
05/16/2012 5:48:22 PM PDT
by
BitWielder1
(Corporate Profits are better than Government Waste)
To: Sub-Driver
32
posted on
05/16/2012 5:51:33 PM PDT
by
Luke21
To: freekitty
You got that right - wonder what the Hill is posturing for this time.
To: Sub-Driver
That must have been said with a wink and a nod!
34
posted on
05/16/2012 5:57:40 PM PDT
by
MtnClimber
(To the left wrong is right, down is up and backward is "Forward")
Comment #35 Removed by Moderator
To: Sub-Driver
O.O
Hillary? As in Queen Hillary the Bimbo Slayer? Vanquisher of Vincent Foster and Sworn Guardian of Prince Priapism?
SHE said this?
Someone needs to check the temperature in Hades, quick!
36
posted on
05/16/2012 6:12:35 PM PDT
by
Dr.Zoidberg
(With (R)epublicans like these, who needs (D)emocrats?)
To: Sub-Driver
Come on, you expect us to believe this?
She’s the one who said, “It takes a village.” She wants government to run every facet of our lives. She tried to get Obamacare going in her husband’s first term.
37
posted on
05/16/2012 6:16:19 PM PDT
by
Rocky
(Obama is pure evil)
To: Sub-Driver
And her nose grew 10 feet after that comment.
What a laugh.
Controling people’s lives is what she dreams of every second of her miserable life.
38
posted on
05/16/2012 6:17:58 PM PDT
by
CapnJack
To: Sioux-san
39
posted on
05/16/2012 6:26:14 PM PDT
by
freekitty
(Give me back my conservative vote; then find me a real conservative to vote for)
To: Carry_Okie
Personally, I don’t think Romney has a chance, even against Obama. But I do think that the Democrats may simply be sick of Obama. A lot of his corporate fanciers have seen the cold light of day, I think his inept handling of the Afgahn situation and other foreign situations has alienated even a lot of Democrats, and it is pretty clear that Obamacare is not popular with anybody and will probably be overturned.
He is focusing on an increasingly narrower segment of the Democratic constituency, and while Hollywood and blacks may like him no matter what, the rest of the Dems are feeling a bit neglected. I think they would be very happy to replace him, particularly with Hillary. Hollywood would come around, blacks might not vote for Hillary but they certainly wouldn’t vote for the Republican either, and I think it would give the Democrats as a whole a chance to regroup and no longer feel the party was focused on just one group (blacks) with one program (redistribution of income) and one goal (government uber alles).
So personally, I don’t see this as an unlikely scenario at all.
40
posted on
05/16/2012 6:28:36 PM PDT
by
livius
To: Sub-Driver
"We just can't trust the American people to make those types of choices... Government has to make those choices for people" -- Cankles on HillaryCare!, as she said to Rep. Dennis Hastert in 1993
To: Sub-Driver
"You know, I'm going to start thanking the woman who cleans the restroom in the building I work in. I'm going to start thinking of her as a human being?" - Cankles quoted in "The Case Against Hillary Clinton", by Peggy Noonan, p. 55
To: Lurker
If this surprises you, raise your hand. I don't know about the rest of you, but I'll go ahead and raise my hand to Hillary.
43
posted on
05/16/2012 6:38:48 PM PDT
by
Windflier
(To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
To: FlingWingFlyer
Sounds like she’s running after all.
Soros gave the green light?
44
posted on
05/16/2012 6:55:01 PM PDT
by
RitaOK
(ABR & ABO Few are unafraid, but I thank God for the few. We are the resistance.)
To: FlingWingFlyer
“Sounds like Hillary isnt into ObarryCare”
With Hillarycare, she didn’t want people to use their OWN money for their OWN health, if it wasn’t in the insurance.
45
posted on
05/16/2012 7:06:21 PM PDT
by
Sun
(Pray that God sends us good leaders. Please say a prayer now.)
To: okie01
If the Democrat party gives the boot to "the first black president" -- in favor of "the first womean president" -- they will lose the black vote. Forever. OTOH, if he steps down because of "birthers" and the Rats let him go for Hillary, not only will they still vote for the Slave Party, Zero may just get the insurrection he wants.
46
posted on
05/16/2012 7:18:30 PM PDT
by
Carry_Okie
(The RNC would prefer Obama to a conservative nominee.)
To: Sub-Driver
Yes, but to Hillary and her ilk, there is no such thing as an “individual”, only the collective.....
47
posted on
05/16/2012 7:30:40 PM PDT
by
weeweed
(Proud Costco University graduate)
To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; bigheadfred; Bockscar; ColdOne; Convert from ECUSA; ...
Thanks Sub-Driver. She's just another left wing liar.
Clinton said that any "sustainable society" must have three "legs" to stand on: an accountable government, a free-market economy, and civil society.
To maintain civility, we need the 1st Amendment (which is why the left pushes for "hate speech" and "zero tolerance") and the 2nd Amendment (which follows right behind the 1st because some people are hard of hearing).
48
posted on
05/16/2012 7:33:10 PM PDT
by
SunkenCiv
(FReepathon 2Q time -- https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
To: Sub-Driver
Hillary! RomneyCare/ObamaCare!
The government has claimed rights to 100% of your earnings. You are a slave! Your boss did it. He patterned his plan after the Republican Nominee!
We’re so screwed.
49
posted on
05/16/2012 7:33:34 PM PDT
by
Uncle Miltie
(The Presidential Race is about the relative light reflectivity of your Slavemaster.)
To: Sub-Driver
“But it is in civil society where we live our lives. Thats where our families are formed; thats where our faith is practiced”
But 0bama’s ‘Julia’ doesn’t need anything but the suckling teat of Government!
50
posted on
05/16/2012 7:34:43 PM PDT
by
Uncle Miltie
(The Presidential Race is about the relative light reflectivity of your Slavemaster.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-50, 51-68 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson