Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 05/15/2012 7:45:09 PM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Nachum

Ping.


2 posted on 05/15/2012 7:47:41 PM PDT by Army Air Corps (Four Fried Chickens and a Coke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

Knew it was coming. Even Beck warned peeps. The ‘NASA’ study that popped out, yesterday, is only the beginning, folks.

You think the war on oil is bad? Just wait. They’re going for our water.


3 posted on 05/15/2012 7:50:17 PM PDT by RushIsMyTeddyBear (A MUST WATCH: http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=KeOLurcQaqI)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

That is the fastest way to start an insurrection.


4 posted on 05/15/2012 7:50:29 PM PDT by elkfersupper ( Member of the Original Defiant Class)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
The Constitution guarantees the States a republican form of government.

How can you arguably have a republic when the States cannot even claim the water within their own borders?

Wars have been fought for less, and been entirely justified.

6 posted on 05/15/2012 7:57:26 PM PDT by tacticalogic ("Oh, bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

Dohbama is punishment to the USA for murdering their babies..
His 2nd term will be devastating..

The question is.. does the USA deserve Dohbama..


11 posted on 05/15/2012 8:27:54 PM PDT by hosepipe (This propaganda has been edited to include some fully orbed hyperbole...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

This is how Agenda 21 will be forced onto the people. It will be incremental, a little here, a little there — always disguised as the beneficial solution to some “crisis.” Eventually the owners of the land will be herded into disgusting tenements in planned cities and the land (and water) will be used for the benefit of all species but homo sapiens. There have already been several trial runs and there will be more, all with the willing help of a traitorous media.


14 posted on 05/15/2012 8:48:08 PM PDT by Bernard Marx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

Indian and Forest Service “reserves” are entitled to the amount of water to accomplish the purpose of the reservation dated to the date the land was withdrawn into federal reserves. It is called the Winter’s Doctrine:

Winters v. United States (207 U.S. 564 (1908) http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=US&vol=207&invol=564

Reserved Water Rights. The Court upheld the power of the federal government to exempt waters from appropriation under state water law, and held that the government had in fact reserved the waters of the Milk River in order to fulfill the purposes of the agreement between the Indians and the United States. The case dealt only with current needs and did not address the future needs of the Indians. Skeem v. United States, 273 F. 93 (9th Cir. 1921)(applying Winters Doctrine to allotted lands;)

“Reserved” water rights are unlike riparian rights or prior appropriation rights, although they contain elements of both. For example, like riparian rights, reserved rights are appurtenant to land; that is, land ownership is the basis of the right. Also like riparian rights, reserved rights are not lost by nonuse. But reserved water can be used on nonriparian lands. And like prior appropriation rights, reserved rights have priority dates which reflect the security of the right. . . . However, the priority date for reserved rights is the date of the reservation or earlier, not the date of diversion, as in the case of most appropriation rights.

The chief characteristic of reserved rights is that they are federal rights, grounded on the (mostly implied) intent of the federal government to reserve water for its purposes. This characteristic serves to distinguish reserved rights from both prior appropriation and riparian rights. [In Re: The general Adjudication of all rights to use water in the Big Horn System and all other Sources, State of Wyoming Case Number: 00-296 Decided: 06/14/2002]

In CA, most reservations were created by Executive Order. Treaties ceding land were NOT ratified by Congress because aboriginal rights (except for a few publos) were considered terminated while under Mexican Rule and the tribes failed to make claims when the land settlement commission was convened after the Treaty of Guiadalupe Hidalgo.

There were several lawsuits and CA tribes were given some monetary consideration for the loss without affirmation of any aboriginal claim.

In Oregon, however, the tribes were considered to cede territory to the U.S. through treaty and they retained their water rights dating to time immemorial. (See the Adair cases.)


19 posted on 05/15/2012 9:36:19 PM PDT by marsh2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

Oh, and if you want to see where federal control of water is going, the international blueprint is here: http://users.sisqtel.net/armstrng/IRWM%20global%20Part2.htm


20 posted on 05/15/2012 9:38:18 PM PDT by marsh2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

Tag for later, gotta get some sleep!


22 posted on 05/15/2012 11:04:54 PM PDT by Loyal Sedition
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
The only thing that's as bad as coming between a mother and her child is coming between a person and their water supply in the desert.

Dumb fight to pick. It's either obey FedGuv and die or have your water and tell them to FO.

32 posted on 05/16/2012 6:45:21 PM PDT by Caipirabob (I say we take off and Newt the site from orbit. It's the only way to be sure...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks; All

If you want to be on or off the Agenda 21 ping list, please notify me by Freepmail. It is a relatively low volume list in which we have been exploring the UN Agenda21 and related topics. We have collected our studies with threads, links, and discussions on the Agenda 21 thread which can be found here:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2738418/posts

NEW ACTION THREAD:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2861644/posts


33 posted on 05/23/2012 3:35:39 PM PDT by TEXOKIE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson