Replies

If you think about it we, the voters, are systematically being encouraged to not vote, or have our own thoughts on anything that is important to us.

You brought up the example of “ - - - the same old manipulative control of the conventions - - - . “

Involved in your example are a great number of other factors that are used against us, the voters. Here is my partial list of these factors:

1.) Presentation of OPINION polls as FACTS to encourage voters not to “throw their vote away” by voting for a candidate that cannot “win;”

2.) Near absolute control of information presented to the voters by the LAM, or Liberal Agenda Media;

3.) Control by POLITICAL parties of the rules, times and lists of candidates the we voters are allowed to choose from;

4.) Protective, selective and subjective vetting of candidates by the LAM;

5.) Selection by delayed State Primary elections to insure that no more than 4 % of the eligible voters are allowed to choose the Nominee of a given political party;

6.) The pervasive arrogance of the RINO Political Party that if you don’t vote for who WE want you to vote for then you are voting for the other evil party to win.

If this is going to be the last National Election where there is still a possibility that Federal Overspending can be drastically reduced voluntarily, then let us have an OPEN Convention and realistically choose the Nominee who truly has demonstrated BY HIS/HER ACTIONS, that a 30 % cut in ALL Entitlement spending PER YEAR is essential to the financial survival of the United States of America.

BTW, why not start by instituting a 50 % cut per year to all financial support to elected Federal Politicians? Well, at least until they have reduced Federal Overspending to be below the average of the previous 2 years of Federal income.

BTW, BTW, here is a Law that the elected Lawyer/Politicians NEVER learned about in Law School:

WHEN YOUR OUTGO EXCEEDS YOUR INCOME, YOUR UPKEEP WILL BE YOUR DOWNFALL.