Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 05/13/2012 5:43:33 PM PDT by markomalley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: markomalley

Obama is now a wide receiver! (of homosexual money)


2 posted on 05/13/2012 5:53:35 PM PDT by WhatNot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: markomalley

He’ll get cash but not votes.
Unless he is planning on buying them, of course.


3 posted on 05/13/2012 5:57:04 PM PDT by netmilsmom (Romney scares me. Obama is the freaking nightmare that is so bad you are afraid to go back to sleep)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: markomalley

>>>”Gays are the next Jews of fundraising,” declared Rahm Emanuel, who is now an Obama confidant, while hustling for donors for Bill Clinton back in 1992.<<<

Which means that the Democrats will treat gays as useful idiots, taking their money and their votes, all the while mistreating them and ignoring them until election times roll around... gee, just like Obama promising that he’s in favor of gay marriage while really not doing anything about it.


5 posted on 05/13/2012 6:18:55 PM PDT by redpoll
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: markomalley

Translation: He’s queer as a three dollar bill himself, but Obama could give a flying fiddler’s damn about you, gays.

It’s ALL about $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$........period. End of discussion.


6 posted on 05/13/2012 6:20:05 PM PDT by RightOnline (I am Andrew Breitbart!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: markomalley
"Gays are the next Jews of fundraising,"

Based on the article's names, I would say "gay Jews" are the next Jews, since about 75% of those listed are also Jewish, including Tobias and Susman (and the unmentioned massive Obama 2008 donor David Geffen).

7 posted on 05/13/2012 6:59:44 PM PDT by montag813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: markomalley
"Gays are the next Jews of fundraising," declared Rahm Emanuel..

He's right: gays have no kids to look after, and they've moved steadily up the ladder. I daresay no other demographic has the expendable income that they have. But-- I don't imagine they're that different from us when it comes to their money.

15 posted on 05/13/2012 7:55:38 PM PDT by tsomer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: markomalley
Mayhaps Obama is trying to solidify the 1/10th of 1% as he heads into the election....

Image Hosted by ImageShack.us

16 posted on 05/13/2012 7:58:39 PM PDT by vox_freedom (America is being tested as never before in its history. May God help us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: markomalley
"One unnamed gay Obama bundler"

naysty

19 posted on 05/13/2012 9:58:08 PM PDT by genetic homophobe (Do we vote for a pro American globalist or a anti American globalist?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: markomalley

And if “life styles” truly becomes an issue under Obamacare (hopefully overturned), i.e., eating habits, and other unhealthy risks, God help the homosexuals and their life styles. They need to realize that Obama is not president for life, nor the liberals in Congress. Not very “forward” thinking IMO.


20 posted on 05/13/2012 11:01:08 PM PDT by Alissa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: markomalley

This writer is a dope. He apparently is ignoring the THIRTEEN POINT swing against Obama after his announcement. In a flash poll immediately after 13% said it would make them MORE likely to vote for Obama BUT 26% said (and you KNOW IT IS MORE)said they would make them LESS likely to vote for Obama. That 13 point swing is larger than the swing on any issue I’ve ever seen.


21 posted on 05/14/2012 4:45:31 AM PDT by jmaroneps37 (Conservatism is truth. Liberalism is lies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: markomalley
This IS indeed a head scratcher. Why they are pushing this at this time is beyond me. A part of me, (the one that doesn't have much faith in the voters) will be totally surprised and shocked if he is re-elected. The other part of me sees this as good news that those on the "right" side of the argument will get out and vote in droves.

Then again, everyone is talking about this foolishness and NOT the lack of jobs, the economy, etc.................
22 posted on 05/14/2012 5:15:13 AM PDT by italyconservative (I'll be holding my nose this November :-( Anyone but 0!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: markomalley

Its all about money.....Clooney’s fundraiser money, Big Gay campaign donation bundlers were also withholding money.......and finally it takes attention away from ObamaVille Economy.....money.


23 posted on 05/14/2012 5:33:33 AM PDT by sbark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: markomalley

26 posted on 05/14/2012 7:51:25 AM PDT by unique1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: markomalley

Tolerance of “gayness” among the rest of the population is largely based on naivete. When the average American sees “gayness” for what it really is; diseased bodies, suicidal and violent, unreliable in the workplace, socially destructive, and predatory on the young, well, what then?


28 posted on 05/14/2012 8:39:19 AM PDT by Missouri gal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson