Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

MEPs criticize behavior of (European) low-cost airlines
European Voice ^ | 10.05.2012 / 15:11 CET (May 10) | Dave Keating

Posted on 05/12/2012 1:15:39 AM PDT by Olog-hai

MEPs today (10 May) voted to condemn low-cost airlines, such as Easyjet and Ryanair, for “aggressive business practices” that hurt the regional airports they operate out of. MEPs said such behavior breaches EU competition law.

The resolution, drafted by Philip Bradbourn, a UK Conservative MEP, says that excessive booking fees and hand-luggage restrictions are discouraging travelers from buying goods in smaller regional airports. The resolution calls on the European Commission and member states to impose caps on charges for excess baggage, and for a common upper weight limit to be set. …


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs
KEYWORDS: airlines; anticompetitive; europeanunion; eussr

1 posted on 05/12/2012 1:15:46 AM PDT by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai
I hope Spirit Air is watching! $100 to carry you own bag on-board! Ridiculous!
2 posted on 05/12/2012 1:57:55 AM PDT by rawhide
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rawhide
I hope Spirit Air is watching! $100 to carry you own bag on-board! Ridiculous!

What's ridiculous about a private company running its business as it sees fit? Don't like it? Don't bring a carry on. Fly another airline. Do anything but please don't applaud unnecessary, harmful and unconstitutional government intervention
3 posted on 05/12/2012 2:09:45 AM PDT by armydoc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

I love Easyjet. I travel light. Why shouldn’t I get a price break?


4 posted on 05/12/2012 3:13:31 AM PDT by kik5150
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai
MEP’s seek to pass “Anti-Dog-Eat-Dog” law.
5 posted on 05/12/2012 4:35:36 AM PDT by Aevery_Freeman (Typed using <FONT STYLE=SARCASM> unless otherwise noted)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: armydoc

The RyanAir business scheme is one that probably wouldn’t work in the US. They go to small airports and just say....we want to operate six flights in and out each day...with no taxes or extra fees tied to us. The airport likely has no real business currently and agrees. So you drive to a town in the middle of nowhere....park for $40 a week...fly out to another airport in the middle of nowhere....rent a car....and do your vacation.

When I flew in Rome....I thought I’d be at the “big” airport...but it ended up being a 1950’s airport about five miles outside of town. I doubt if they had more than twenty flights a day in and out of that small airport. No customs....just pick up your bag and go.


6 posted on 05/12/2012 4:44:18 AM PDT by pepsionice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: armydoc
I have not and will not fly spirit Air. Still, their price shenanigan on a carry-on is ridiculous! And I will tell you why. This can lead to other airlines to begin charging this carry-on fee. Just wait and see, this will happen. This is what happened to the checked baggage with one airline charging a fee, and now almost all airlines are charging the fee. The airlines would love to nickel and dime you for everything if they could get away with it, including going to the restroom, which I understand an airline in Europe is wanting to do. Wait until the airline begin to start charging by the pound to fly.
7 posted on 05/12/2012 8:14:59 AM PDT by rawhide
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: rawhide
I have not and will not fly spirit Air.

Thank you for illustrating my point. It appears capitalism is working perfectly here. A private enterprise offers a service at a price they set. That price is intended to maximize profits (the horror!). Consumers are free to accept or reject. Of course other airlines will start charging fees if they judge that they will maximize their profits. If they judge wrong, they may be out of business because of the backlash of people like yourself. There is no role for government intervention here. If you are a conservative you should not be cheerleading for it.
8 posted on 05/12/2012 10:35:16 AM PDT by armydoc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai
excessive booking fees and hand-luggage restrictions are discouraging travellers from buying goods in smaller regional airports

Are they running shopping malls or places where planes land and people can get on them?

9 posted on 05/12/2012 12:53:26 PM PDT by BfloGuy (The final outcome of the credit expansion is general impoverishment.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson