Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Romney says he's "fine" with gay couples adopting children
CBS NEWS ^ | 05/10/2012 | Walt Cronkite

Posted on 05/11/2012 6:50:11 AM PDT by Above My Pay Grade

(CBS News) Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney said Thursday that while he opposes same-sex marriage, he is "fine" with gay couples adopting children. The presumptive nominee also declined to criticize President Obama's reversal on the issue, saying he would "respect the right of the president to reach the conclusion he has."

In his most detailed comments to date on the issue of civil rights for gay people, Romney told Fox News television host Neil Cavuto, "I know many gay couples that are able to adopt children. That's fine. But my preference is that we ... continue to define marriage as the relationship between man and a women."

The statement seemed to put Romney in the position of condoning same-sex families with children as long as the parents do not marry.

(Excerpt) Read more at cbsnews.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2012; adoption; gayadoption; homosexualagenda; obama; parenting; parents; romney; romney2012; romneytruthfile
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-59 next last
Reason #243 why a vote for Romney is no different than a vote for Obama.
1 posted on 05/11/2012 6:50:15 AM PDT by Above My Pay Grade
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Above My Pay Grade

I started out with that position but have met far to many seriously brain screwed people who resulted from gay parents.


2 posted on 05/11/2012 6:52:53 AM PDT by cripplecreek (What does it profit a man if he gains the whole world but loses his soul?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Above My Pay Grade

Romney is letting the Obama MSM control the narrative. Gay rights is not a big issue in this election. Obama is going to lose votes because of his stand on gay marriage. Time to get off the subject.


3 posted on 05/11/2012 6:53:30 AM PDT by popdonnelly (Socialism isn't going to work this time, either.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Above My Pay Grade

He needs to see the news photos of the freaky homosexuals in San Francisco leading little children around with dog collars and leashes.


4 posted on 05/11/2012 6:54:08 AM PDT by WestwardHo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Above My Pay Grade

Child abuse, pure and simple.


5 posted on 05/11/2012 6:54:36 AM PDT by ransacked
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Above My Pay Grade

Boy, Romney’s got that etch-a-sketch working 24/7.


6 posted on 05/11/2012 6:54:36 AM PDT by circlecity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Above My Pay Grade
The presumptive nominee also declined to criticize President Obama's reversal on the issue, saying he would "respect the right of the president to reach the conclusion he has."

Yes, keep being Mr. Nice Guy. It worked so well for McCain.

7 posted on 05/11/2012 6:54:56 AM PDT by ILS21R (John Locke: When the social contract is broken, the people must revolt.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Above My Pay Grade

I cannot believe that he said that. He’s a stupid, stupid man.


8 posted on 05/11/2012 6:55:52 AM PDT by Clara Lou
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Above My Pay Grade
Battle of the HyperFlatulent, ScumSucking, ToadKissing Crapweasels, coming this fall to a TV near you.

Sarah save me.

9 posted on 05/11/2012 6:57:01 AM PDT by Izzy Dunne (Hello, I'm a TAGLINE virus. Please help me spread by copying me into YOUR tag line.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Above My Pay Grade

What about the children? Shouldn’t they have a say in this? Shouldn’t they be able to say, “I want a normal life with a normal family”?


10 posted on 05/11/2012 6:57:57 AM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (Dumb, dependent and Democrat is no way to go through life. - Rep. Louie Gohmert (R-Texas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Above My Pay Grade

For me, it’s the adopting children part of this gay marriage issue that is the most troubling.


11 posted on 05/11/2012 6:58:15 AM PDT by Teotwawki (For a person to get a thing without paying for it, another must pay for it without getting it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Above My Pay Grade

Out of the fire, into the frying pan.


12 posted on 05/11/2012 6:58:30 AM PDT by Mr Ramsbotham (Laws against sodomy are honored in the breech.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Above My Pay Grade
This sailboat is tacking back and forth so fast. Romney can sure trim sail. But what he needed to say is that with adoption waiting lists for infants there is no need for anything other than married couples adopting babies. And Romney himself defines married couples as male and female.

Romney is hurting himself on this issues by alienating everyone from faggots to Focus on the Family.

13 posted on 05/11/2012 7:03:35 AM PDT by Monterrosa-24 (...even more American that a French bikini and a Russian AK-47.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Above My Pay Grade

this makes me nauseous!!! As a adoptive mom of 5 adult children I cannot fathom the damage done to these already needy ones!! I truly am struggling this election....
Polly


14 posted on 05/11/2012 7:03:35 AM PDT by pollywog ("O Thou who changest not, abide with me.".......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Above My Pay Grade

CBS hoped to touch off a firestorm distraction with the question.

Romney either actually thinks this way, or he doesn’t feel like he knows how to defend the obvious moral position on the issue.

Either way, in the long run, this is going to lead to a split-up of the United States, and possibly a civil war with terrible consequences.

The effects of gay adoption won’t be seen clearly for years, when the children’s stories start to come out.


15 posted on 05/11/2012 7:04:07 AM PDT by Steely Tom (If the Constitution can be a living document, I guess a corporation can be a person.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Above My Pay Grade
I am getting so sick with all this queer stuff..The election as far as I know is not about queers but about getting Obama out of Washington..What is going on is these filthy democrats started all of this to keep the real important things out of the news like Obama and his destruction of America..So move on and who cares if the filthy morons marry their pig mates,they are not really married..

Take a good look at the goof balls getting married they look like fools..Lets work on getting fool and his bunch ofcriminals ourt of Washington...

16 posted on 05/11/2012 7:04:31 AM PDT by PLD (It is time the freeloaders leave the white house and go back to the hell hole where they came from..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Above My Pay Grade

I just dont understand...all he has to do is comment on the Economy, strong national defense/borders, and tax relief, and leave all the other social muddling alone, and he wins easily! Im also uncomfortable with his Romneycare history, some liberal social positions as governor, but Obama is actively trying to destroy my country. Im focusing on electing conservative congressmen, senators and local officials as the best way to get change...


17 posted on 05/11/2012 7:06:03 AM PDT by radioactivereb ("I'm tryin' to think but nothin' happens!"-Curly Howard)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Above My Pay Grade

Here’s the thing....and keep an open mind.

First, I agree somewhat with your comment. I think Romney’s waffling on the subject but he does somehow wiggle in the notion that children are better off raised by two parents of the opposite sex. It ain’t rocket science. Each parent brings something to the equation and it’s the difference in their genders that make a child well-rounded, loved and able to go on their own with all the elements of survival as was God’s plan.

BUT....a while ago I suggested, not on this forum but I do forget where, that perhaps homosexual parents could adopt children that no one else would adopt.

Like I said....open mind.

There are children so handicapped that no one is willing, of just can’t, care for them. They spend their lives in sterile, loveless institutions.

Well my comment caused a pile of rage...who did I think I was casting off handicapped children as second class...that sort of thing.

No. This is common sense.

I’ve a stepdaughter who couldn’t have children. When she went to adopt a child she was unable, I don’t know why, to get a newborn or even younger child to bring into her home to love and raise. I dunno, she was poor, didn’t own her own house....well I dunno why she couldn’t get a baby but she couldn’t.

She’s a nice enough person as I saw it but newborns often have a bevy of would-be parents vying for them.

Anyway, she was able to adopt a child who was very handicapped. I tell you, Mary(false name) has been the most devoted mother to this child. The child, now a teenager, is retarded and I think she’s considered autistic. She has to wear diapers and be specially educated.

Anyway, this child probably would not have been adopted had Mary not been able to get a newborn/young child.

It’s just common sense, the way it is...take your pick.

I think a child is better off with same sex parents if they are otherwise unadoptable and by my true example above, it’s not that I deem same sex parents as less than human no more than those in charge of adopting out babies deemed Mary less than perfect to get a very adoptable child.

Anyway, I know Romney couldn’t say that I suppose, darn there would have been a firestorm of condemnation.

My point being that if same sex parents really want a child so much they should be willing to take a child that would otherwise spend a sad life in a sterile loveless institution.

Never mind that this same child will not get the advantage of being raised by opposite sexed parents, to learn the ways of the species. For a severely handicapped child, that’s the least of their problems.

Just food for thought, don’t want to fight.


18 posted on 05/11/2012 7:06:16 AM PDT by Fishtalk (http://patfish.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clara Lou

it’s worse than I though, and still going downhill. the smell of a brokered convention is getting even stronger


19 posted on 05/11/2012 7:06:50 AM PDT by stickywillie (a corrupt parallel universe exists beside our wonderful Constitution)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: popdonnelly

,....and if Romney doesn’t stand against Obama on this issue, we are once again without options. Maybe we DO NEED a brokered convention.

Going to give the Romney campaign a call today. Flood those phones with distain over this issue.


20 posted on 05/11/2012 7:06:57 AM PDT by pollywog ("O Thou who changest not, abide with me.".......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-59 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson