So gays have a right to make other people's children grow up with two daddies or two mommies, but they don't have a right to marry because . . . ? IDIOT.
posted on 05/10/2012 4:07:47 PM PDT
Playing right into Obama’s hands. Economy has not been the topic on the news since this “evolution” of Obama’s.
Does Myth expect us to forget that he has a history?
He’s a bald face liar.
Romney vs. Obama? One of them has to lose, I’ll rejoice in that fact, whichever it is.
posted on 05/10/2012 4:17:43 PM PDT
(Romney vs. Obama? One of them has to lose, I'll rejoice in that fact, whichever it is.)
Gays should have the right to adopt children resulting from homosexual practices, not the children of straight people.
posted on 05/10/2012 4:19:35 PM PDT
(Barack 0bama: Implementing class warfare by having no class!)
Reminds me of Lot in the Bible. I don’t agree with the idea, but here take my daughters.
posted on 05/10/2012 4:44:44 PM PDT
(Ride for the Brand. Joshua 24:15)
Gay adoption is a much greater travesty than gay marriage. Not surprisingly, milt has snatched defeat from the jaws of victory.
posted on 05/10/2012 4:47:56 PM PDT
(Not voting for etchamitt...no way...no how)
wanted marriage defined on the federal level as being between a man and woman only, but also noted that he backs gay adoption.
Too bad Mitt, only liberals can have it both ways. Unless of course......
posted on 05/10/2012 5:24:11 PM PDT
(I will not vote for Romney period. You can't trust the man with the big red (R))
posted on 05/10/2012 8:40:57 PM PDT
("I'm not concerned about the very poor." -- severely conservative Mitt 'Etch-A-Sketch' Rmoney)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson