Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Laissez-faire capitalist

Federal ban is not necessarily a constitutional amendment.

I think.


5 posted on 05/09/2012 2:45:56 PM PDT by VanDeKoik (If case you are wondering, I'm STILL supporting Newt.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: VanDeKoik; All

Read my last post.

Given that DOMA is already in place, there can be nothing else but a constitutional amendment that Romney is talking about. Romney does not want to have any federal mandate concerning same-sex marriage, hence why Priebus said that this issue should be left up to the individual states.

A Constitutional amendment banning gay marriage would take this issue away from the states.


8 posted on 05/09/2012 2:51:03 PM PDT by Laissez-faire capitalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson