To: Zakeet
From the article, “which isn’t a “belief,” but a well-established scientific theory ...”
And from the Scientific Method, that which is established is fact, that which is believed is theory.
13 posted on
05/06/2012 8:00:23 PM PDT by
prolusion
(Sort of jumped out at me.)
To: prolusion
Exactly!
These leftists are abject dummkopfs!
15 posted on
05/06/2012 8:03:37 PM PDT by
Artcore
To: prolusion
but a well-established scientific theory ...
A well-established religion...
19 posted on
05/06/2012 8:13:06 PM PDT by
Mark
(Don't argue with my posts. I typed while under sniper fire..)
To: prolusion
Also according to the Scientific Method, a theory is a hypothesis (a tentative causal explanation for an observation) which is supported by a lot of evidence. A true scientist must always remain open to having his theory modified by others or himself on the basis of additional evidence. I would say that any objective scientist would look at the LACK of evidence for AGW and modify the theory. This shows that those scientists who refuse to do so are NOT objective and that AGW is not really a scientific theory but a purely political statement.
24 posted on
05/06/2012 8:43:55 PM PDT by
srmorton
(Deut. 30 19: "..I have set before you life and death,....therefore, choose life..")
To: prolusion
From the article, which isnt a belief, but a well-established scientific theory ...
And from the Scientific Method, that which is established is fact, that which is believed is theory.Indeed. They can't even lie correctly.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson