July 25 2011: Is Mitt Romney The Father of Gay Marriage? Twenty-Four Reasons Why He Is (July 25, 201

RomneyExposed.com ^ | July 25, 2011

[SoConPubbie]

As Mitt Romney prepares for his second presidential campaign and gay marriage threatens to undermine America’s Judeo-Christian culture, there’s a raging debate about the role he played in instituting gay marriage in Massachusetts during his gubernatorial term. This is important because Governor Romney has positioned himself as a champion of traditional values and claims to have been an opponent of homosexual marriage his entire career.

When the Massachusetts Supreme Court issued a decision in favor of homosexual marriage, — the Goodridge case — Romney unilaterally ordered his state agencies to implement homosexual marriage in Massachusetts. The court did not order him to do this nor had the legislature codified this ruling. Combined with a promise by President Obama to repeal the federal Defense of Marriage Act, this action by Romney has led significantly contributed to the spread of homosexual marriage nationwide.

Make no mistake; Romney’s action was utterly illegal. In four different parts of the Massachusetts Constitution, it is clearly stated that only the legislature can change laws and one section specifically states that the marriage statutes are determined by the legislature, not by the courts. Even the Supreme Court itself stated that it could not order the legislature to act. All Romney had to do was to declare the court had no authority to enforce its unconstitutional opinion and ignore its decision.

But instead of doing that, Romney abruptly claimed the court opinion was now the law of the land and ordered his Town Clerks and Justices of the Peace to marry homosexuals — even though the legislature never acted to codify the ruling. Indeed, according to a Fox News/AP story, the attorney for the homosexual plaintiffs in Goodridge, held the view that the legislature would have to codify the Goodridge ruling:

[SoConPubbie]

And so your winning strategy is.....?

Don't confuse me with a Party over Principle, win at all costs Republican. I'm a conservative first and a Republican second.

"If we must have an enemy at the head of Government, let it be one whom we can oppose, and for whom we are not responsible, who will not involve our party in the disgrace of his foolish and bad measures." - Alexander Hamilton

[Oregon Coast Conservative]

You ignored my question. Do you know who owns the private domain registered website that you keep posting from? And if not, maybe you should find out before you use it as a source, that is the way it used to work. You know because maybe someone that place might be mixing opinion with fact.

[caww]

Romney abruptly claimed the court opinion was now the law of the land and ordered his Town Clerks and Justices of the Peace to marry homosexuals — even though the legislature never acted to codify the ruling

Looks like Romney's already practiced hwo to bypass checks and balances. Yet people seem to imagine "others" in Congress wil push him to their thinking?

He has a focused agenda and it's nothing to do with our nations people..but his own.

[RushingWater]

The only bright spot in the Obama nightmare has been the surge of conservatives elected in 2010 as the not so conservative became frightened of the real Obama. Seems like Romney and Obama are both for The US of Sodom and Gomorrah.

So the choice is to vote for Romney, destroy the GOP base or just not vote and maybe have a more stacked Senate and House against liberal evil - which is personified in BOTH Obama and Romney.

BTW, the entire primary process should be nullified because of what Virginia did.

[stpio]

MittWits have already compromised God, in order to fulfill their illusion of getting rid of Obama.

~ ~ ~

This is truly a sign of the end times. You can’t even vote
for a lessor of two evils.

Insane. BHO is a Herod, we know already. Lying Romney
pretends to be whatever you wish to get elected. Foolish
people are falling for it.

I will not vote for Romney, he has not shown he is for life, just the opposite. He is pro-gay, pro-sodomy.

[caww]

“If we must have an enemy at the head of Government, let it be one whom we can oppose, and for whom we are not responsible, who will not involve our party in the disgrace of his foolish and bad measures.”......Alexander Hamilton

Exactly! Love it!

[SoConPubbie]

You ignored my question. Do you know who owns the private domain registered website that you keep posting from? And if not, maybe you should find out before you use it as a source, that is the way it used to work. You know because maybe someone that place might be mixing opinion with fact.

I post from many different websites. Not sure which one you are referring to.

Furthmore, if you can rebut the facts in the articles, Romnney's history of being a lying, left-wing, Progressive Liberal, please do.

[COBOL2Java]

Looks like Romney's already practiced how to bypass checks and balances. Yet people seem to imagine "others" in Congress wil push him to their thinking?

Only the damned fools who profess to be conservatives yet have convinced themselves they're doing something good by voting for Romney.

[Oregon Coast Conservative]

I am referring to the website that you posted at the top of this thread. www.romneyexposed.com. It is not my job to explain Romney’s past, but if you are going to use sources that hide who is funding them, I won’t bother to read them either. Some of what you say about Romney is true, some is exaggerated, but we all know what Obama is, and that Romney is probably going to be the nominee. Everyone on here has read your threads a thousand times, and some of us knew in 2007 what Romney is. But unless you have an alternative that has a chance to compete, continuing to post the same things a thousand times just makes people ignore what you post. You know, one of these times you might have some new information, and noone will even read it, I’m sure you know about the boy who cried wolf, right?

[Psalm 144]

“Smart move why go to the polls at all, just stay home.”

That is tempting, and would be the first such temptation since Ford-Carter in 1976, but there is no way I would miss the opportunity to vote against not just one, but TWO fathers of state sponsored abortion at the same time! How cool is that? It is like rolling a grenade under a table where both Heinrich Himmler and Lavrenti Beria are seated together. BOOM!

There is no way I am going to miss the party.

[SoConPubbie]

some is exaggerated

Really, what is exaggerated?

[SoConPubbie]

But unless you have an alternative that has a chance to compete, continuing to post the same things a thousand times just makes people ignore what you post. You know, one of these times you might have some new information, and noone will even read it, I’m sure you know about the boy who cried wolf, right?

I know you party-over-principle types would rather be lulled to sleep and not have to face the truth about your boy Romney, but for those of us who cannot and will not vote for a lying, left-wing, Progressive Liberal like Mitt Romney, we will continue to be honest about Romney's record and who he is.

And this site is not about new information, it's about the truth, and that is what I and others are posting about Romney, his record, the truth about Mitt Romney.

[SoConPubbie]

It is not my job to explain Romney’s past, but if you are going to use sources that hide who is funding them, I won’t bother to read them either.

So do you actually believe that everyone on FreeRepublic, or even a majority of posters, researches out who funds particular websites?

Where do you you find that information? Have you ever seen that information posted on a website? Do you expect to see George Soros name as the registered owner of the website?

Or is it that it annoys you that your boy Romney's record is being exposed on a regular basis on FreeRepublic?

[Oregon Coast Conservative]

You must know how to use Google.com, right. Much of the so called “facts” on that website are taken out of context.Find the answers for yourself. They are available on legitimate websites that don’t hide behind hidden ips. And you still haven’t told me if you know who funds www.romneyexposed.com. Do you or not? And I don’t know if you read what you are responding to, but I will repeat myself, I don’t know if I will vote for Romney or not, but I will not help reelect the American hater in the White House.

[COBOL2Java]

So do you actually believe that everyone on FreeRepublic, or even a majority of posters, researches out who funds particular websites?

Where do you you find that information? Have you ever seen that information posted on a website? Do you expect to see George Soros name as the registered owner of the website?

Or is it that it annoys you that your boy Romney's record is being exposed on a regular basis on FreeRepublic?

I'll vote for Door #3, Monty!

[SoConPubbie]

You must know how to use Google.com, right. Much of the so called “facts” on that website are taken out of context.Find the answers for yourself.

No, you're the one making the accusations, put up or shut up, don't ask me to do your job.

You see I've read through the articles and can prove most if not all of the points being made by cross-referencing other articles that make the same points with different sources of public records.

[who knows what evil?]

The platform of the Constitution Party sounds like it could have been written by Jim Robinson...

[Oregon Coast Conservative]

You find out who owns a site by doing a whois.com search. For instance, for Freerepulic you get this
“Registrant:
Free Republic, LLC
Jim Robinson
P.O. Box 9771
Fresno, CA 93794
US
+1.5592731400
@whois.gkg.net

Administrative Contact:
Free Republic, LLC
John Robinson
6245 N Prospect
Fresno, CA 93711
US
+1.5592130991
@whois.gkg.net

Technical Contact:
Free Republic, LLC
John Robinson
6245 N Prospect
Fresno, CA 93711
US
+1.5592130991
@whois.gkg.net

Billing Contact
Free Republic, LLC
John Robinson
6245 N Prospect
Fresno, CA 93711
US
+1.5592130991
@whois.gkg.net

Registrar..: gkg.net (http://register.gkg.net/)
Domain Name: FREEREPUBLIC.COM
Created on..............: 23-SEP-1996
Expires on..............: 22-SEP-2016
Record last updated on..: 14-SEP-2011
Status..................: ACTIVE”
Do you see how you can clearly see who owns the site? Now lets try it for Romneyexposed.com
“
Domain name: romneyexposed.com

Registrant Contact:
Whois Privacy Protection Service, Inc.
Whois Agent ()

Fax:
PMB 368, 14150 NE 20th St - F1
C/O romneyexposed.com
Bellevue, WA 98007
US

Administrative Contact:
Whois Privacy Protection Service, Inc.
Whois Agent (@whoisprivacyprotect.com)
+1.4252740657
Fax: +1.4259744730
PMB 368, 14150 NE 20th St - F1
C/O romneyexposed.com
Bellevue, WA 98007
US

Technical Contact:
Whois Privacy Protection Service, Inc.
Whois Agent (@whoisprivacyprotect.com)
+1.4252740657
Fax: +1.4259744730
PMB 368, 14150 NE 20th St - F1
C/O romneyexposed.com
Bellevue, WA 98007
US

Status: Locked

Name Servers:
NS1.bluehost.com
NS2.Bluehost.com

Creation date: 25 Apr 2010 14:54:12
Expiration date: 25 Apr 2013 14:54:00”
Do you see how they have hidden the sites owners? Now why would they do that, do you think?

[Last Dakotan]

I'm a conservative first and a Republican second.

Fine, - so what's your plan?

[SoConPubbie]

And you still haven’t told me if you know who funds www.romneyexposed.com. Do you or not?

No, I do not.

Do you?

Do you know who funds the MassResistance site?, how about the Spectator.org site? How about RightWingNews.com? or AmyContrada.com? you see I post from many sites, and most of them provide links to their sites or footnotes or some type of corroborating information to support their positions and articles.

Many allow opposing opinions and articles about Romney like RightWingNews.com. They allowed that political whore Ann Romney to lie about Romney's record while also allowing multiple authors to provide factually based arguments against Romney.

So instead of focusing on one site, that you seem to be consumed with POSSIBLY being funded by someone you don't like because you don't like what is being said about your boy Romney, why don't you try and refute their arguments, made factually with historical information about Romney.

To repeat: instead of throwing up a smoke screen trying to divert attention from that lying, left-wing, Progressive Liberal Mitt Romney's record, try and refute the information provided in the articles. So far you've made accusations with no proof.