Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Gingrich to WCNC: 'We’ll continue to campaign'
WCNC ^ | 4-24-12 | staff

Posted on 04/24/2012 6:24:18 PM PDT by VinL

Despite speculation that he might drop out of the presidential race soon, Newt Gingrich said he is pressing on during an exclusive interview with NewsChannel 36 anchor Dave Wagner Tuesday afternoon.

“These reports somehow get exaggerated,” Gingrich. “We have 23 events this week…What I did say was that we are going to evaluate actively and honestly what has happened here.”

Gingrich spent part of Tuesday at the Billy Graham library with his wife and campaign staff. He is expected at an event Tuesday night in Concord as well.

“Under any circumstance we are going to be at every single event we outlined this week and our expectation is that we’ll continue to campaign until Romney gets to 1144 delegates.

“I think it is very important for the voters to be the people who decide, not the news media or the campaign consultants,” Gingrich added.

Click here to listen to the entire interview.

(Excerpt) Read more at wcnc.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events; US: Delaware
KEYWORDS: de2012; delaware; gingrich; newt2012
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-116 next last
To: skr
If nothing else, Romney is close friends with Netanyahu.

According to Romney in a widely quoted NYT interview, which seems to be the only source. Yes, they've known each other since their time at Boston Consulting Group in 1976 and have had intermittent contact, but I don't see any similar affirmation from Netanyahu, only a wishy-washy quote from an aide.

Nothing in the local (MA) gossip suggests that Romney knows what a "close friend" is.

81 posted on 04/25/2012 5:21:27 AM PDT by maryz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: VinL

True. It’s a no brainer.

Romney is a horrible candidate.

Newt has the potential—based on his record, what he’s been saying and the lessons he’s learned in life—to be as good as or better than Ronald Reagan.

There’s nothing to lose in throwing all our support behind Gingrich.


82 posted on 04/25/2012 5:34:22 AM PDT by reasonisfaith (Why do you seek the living among the dead? (Luke 24:5))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reasonisfaith

Romney won all the northeast states. Surprise, surprise. How many would he win in November. I’d bet none.

Do we want the whole country to look like Massachusetts when Romney was governor? I hope not.


83 posted on 04/25/2012 5:39:42 AM PDT by McGruff (Vote for Newt. The only conservative left in the race.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: JRandomFreeper
"Because Romney has the same chance as Bush 1..."

...the 41st President of the United States.

84 posted on 04/25/2012 5:52:03 AM PDT by StAnDeliver (=)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: gusty
No, you're right, they definitely were not both American heroes; and should never be mentioned together. I'm sure losing after 13 days when you are outnumbered 15 to 1 is the very definition of military stupidity. Should have been an easy victory for Travis and no amount of courage was shown by his men. I will be sure to acquire a modern liberal revisionist history book that states that.

Thank you for the enriching political discussion regarding the topic of the thread.

85 posted on 04/25/2012 5:52:42 AM PDT by Idaho_Cowboy (Certainty of death. Small chance of success what are we waiting for. Gimili - Lord of the Rings)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: IrishBrigade
That doesn't even make any sense...Is that all you got?

Go ahead cast your LOSING vote, no matter what the result, the republican party and America loses, horribly.

What astounds me is some conservatives can't understand the "absolute" detrimental effect of this GOPe/rino vote. For everybody else, it doesn't matter at this point...Some are just too ignorant of history to understand.

86 posted on 04/25/2012 5:57:16 AM PDT by sirchtruth (Freedom is not free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: IrishBrigade
..has nothing at all to do with enthusiasm in November,

Oh yes it does. We chatted with the poll workers. They said no one was enthusiastic, more fatalistic. And that the primary was not well advertised or promoted.

Romney is a loser.

87 posted on 04/25/2012 5:59:57 AM PDT by DJ MacWoW (America! The wolves are here! What will you do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: skr
they just have to be excited enough to vote

And they weren't. And I'm not the only FReeper that's talking about empty polling places.

88 posted on 04/25/2012 6:01:39 AM PDT by DJ MacWoW (America! The wolves are here! What will you do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: VinL

I proudly supported Newt in the GA primary, and will continue to do so. The Romneybots hate to hear the truth, but here it is: IF YOU VOTE FOR ROMNEY, YOU ARE BLATANTLY SUPPORTING MARXISM. Goooooooooooo NEWT!!!!!


89 posted on 04/25/2012 6:07:54 AM PDT by arderkrag ("WAAHH WAAAHHH SCOTUS" is no excuse to vote for Romney. LOOKING FOR ROLEPLAYERS. Check Profile.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VinL

Frankly I think it’s kind of a dumb decision.

That being said, hey, more power to him. I agree with you. If he annoys the Blue Bloods and Lamestream media than this makes me happy.


90 posted on 04/25/2012 6:41:57 AM PDT by Fishtalk (http://patfish.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: caww

I voted for Newt yesterday here in the swamps of Delaware.

He did the best in Delaware yesterday, garnering 27% of the vote.

He would have won this state but recent happenstances changed and affected so much.

First, Santorum and Paul were BOTH on the Delaware Republican primary ballot yesterday. Between those two, about 12% of the vote was likely siphoned from Newt.

Second, there’d been big rumors last week that Newt was cancelling his North Carolina appearances and, while Newt’s campaign denied, it greatly affected the turnout.

Voter turnout was very lackluster yesterday. Had all that crap last week not been thrown out there to be repeated hysterically by the media (and to make me wonder if it wasn’t some operative in the Romney campaign somehow making this happen) I believe turnout would have been higher.

In short, I’m quite certain that Delaware, where we kicked out Mike Castle and voted in Christine O’Donnell to great ridicule, would be Newt all the way over Romney given a fair and vibrant primary.


91 posted on 04/25/2012 6:49:03 AM PDT by Fishtalk (http://patfish.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: VinL

Fox reporting Newt is “wrapping up campaign” in a week and “will probably endorse Romney” on that day...


92 posted on 04/25/2012 6:55:45 AM PDT by StAnDeliver (=)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IrishBrigade
"...but looking at the electoral college map, and the swing state’s polling data, Romney’s got a real mountain to climb..."

What? Are you referring to the Gallup/USAToday 'poll'?

The one that sampled "Registered voters" not "Likely voters"?

The one that included 7 Bobo-in-2008 states the GOP nom doesn't need to win? [CO, IA, MI, NH, NM, PA, WI]

PA & MI included as "swing states" when the last time those two of those large states went GOP was 1998?

Indiana excluded from a swing state poll despite going for Obama in 2008?

Here's what you need to know: The Electoral Math of 2012 greatly favors the challenger... 2008 + IN, NC, FL, NV, VA, OH = 271EV.

93 posted on 04/25/2012 7:07:52 AM PDT by StAnDeliver (=)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

"PA & MI included as "swing states" when the last time those two large states went GOP was 1988?"

24 years ago. That swing state poll was pure bs.

94 posted on 04/25/2012 7:12:17 AM PDT by StAnDeliver (=)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: DJ MacWoW
We chatted with the poll workers. They said no one was enthusiastic, more fatalistic

In my district the poll workers were likewise. Some actually stated, "What are we voting for" with arms swung up! Distraught over Romney proclaiming his win before he had the delegates, and the media vocally shutting out the election and claiming Romneys win so that any who voted would indeed check Romney....and many followed the pitch.

95 posted on 04/25/2012 7:22:02 AM PDT by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: caww

The MSM suppressed the vote. The advocacy journalism is blatantly obvious.


96 posted on 04/25/2012 7:28:21 AM PDT by DJ MacWoW (America! The wolves are here! What will you do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: DJ MacWoW
The MSM suppressed the vote. The advocacy journalism is blatantly obvious.

The media has power it should not have, but like the candidates, money does move these machines. They own.. 'the message'... the public is to get, regardless of reality, and will paint whatever picture is necessary to position who they will favorably... and destroy those otherwise.

97 posted on 04/25/2012 7:44:01 AM PDT by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: caww

The media has always had power. They were infiltrated by the left and started using that power to push their POV. And the sheep haven’t caught on.


98 posted on 04/25/2012 7:54:12 AM PDT by DJ MacWoW (America! The wolves are here! What will you do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: sirchtruth; onyx; Jim Robinson; TheOldLady
LOL you need to read. I have never said "vote for romney" nor would I. I voted for Santorum.

2 FReepers last night stated "I will actively campaign for Obama now."

No it wasn't sarcastic.

I can understand people staying home or voting for a write in.

But if these FReepers will be posting Obama / Biden 12 Propaganda here, then you will see a mass exodus.

Since I cannot find their posts I'm assuming the Mods deleted it, which is a comforting thing.

Most FReepers voted for Newt or Santorum, none of us who voted that way have told people to vote for Mitt Romney.

But when FReepers tell people to vote for Obama, that is offensive to me.

99 posted on 04/25/2012 8:03:17 AM PDT by Dengar01 (Go Bulls!!! Go White Sox!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: JRandomFreeper; katiedidit1; onyx; Jim Robinson; TheOldLady; Impy; fieldmarshaldj; BillyBoy; ...
If Romney wins the nomination, I will actively campaign against him.

None of my conservative aquaintances will vote for Romney.

He has the same chance as Dole and McCain.

/johnny

Found it! Please don't try and twist this statement Katie you know what JRandomFreeper means in this statement.

FR is against RINOs! And I support FReepers in their beliefs but this is not a forum to support Barack Hussein Obama!!!

100 posted on 04/25/2012 8:09:39 AM PDT by Dengar01 (Go Bulls!!! Go White Sox!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-116 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson