Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Gingrich tells NY GOP he would support Romney
the-leader.com/newsnow/AP ^ | Apr 20, 2012 @ 09:51 AM | the-leader.com/newsnow/AP

Posted on 04/20/2012 8:29:18 AM PDT by Dubya-M-DeesWent2SyriaStupid!

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-71 last
To: Windflier

Sad.

The other issue is that despite a huge tea party resurgence in 2010, historic midterm gains (Under MIchael Steele, who we also dumped, mind you) and a massive independent conservative uprising since Obama’s election, we’ve managed to allow mooooooderates and the establishment to run the show yet again. We didn’t learn with McCain? Really?


61 posted on 04/20/2012 4:00:17 PM PDT by CountryClassSF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: The KG9 Kid

I think some people are in competition, screaming their hatred of Mitt for the benefit of others,in fear of being called disloyal.


62 posted on 04/20/2012 4:33:01 PM PDT by turn_to
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: bgill; All
Newt, no! Keep on the campaign trail and you might outpace that used car salesman.

Newt has ALWAYS said he would support the Republican nominee, including Romney. Only Romney had to first earn his 1144 delegates before Newt would support him.

Mark Levin asked Rick Santorum if he would support Romney were he the nominee, and Santorum also said he would, just like he hoped Romney would support him (Santorum) if here were the nominee...

This is nothing new, and people treating is as something it isn't are simply trying to spread misinformation.

Newt's point is and always has been, get the 1144, Mitt, and I will support you. If you hadn't noticed, Willard doesn't have 1144 delegates yet. He has about half. Gee.

63 posted on 04/20/2012 4:44:06 PM PDT by true believer forever (GO NEWT! On to Tampa - hang tight - we can do this!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; bigheadfred; Bockscar; ColdOne; Convert from ECUSA; ...

Thanks Dubya-M-DeesWent2SyriaStupid!.


64 posted on 04/20/2012 6:05:08 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (FReepathon 2Q time -- https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau

Well so is Newt. Newt was doing some work for Fox. Appears he’s trying to hook up with CNN. My guess is the heavy hitters of the party will be allowed to have a say unless they signal they aren’t going to play nice.


65 posted on 04/20/2012 6:26:58 PM PDT by joesbucks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: smokingfrog
Not endorsing Romney, but everyone said I was wrong when I said this was coming sooner then later.
66 posted on 04/20/2012 6:57:40 PM PDT by MacMattico
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Dubya-M-DeesWent2SyriaStupid!

When Newt debated for the first time in Iowa..he stated that ANY candidate on the podium was better than Obama. So? the point is? Newt believes Obama is the most dangerous president in history but I don’t believe Newt has any love lost for Romney either.
Who do you think Perry will vote for if my man..NEWT...isnt the nominee. Have to tell you though..Romney and his NRC cohorts have run one damn dirty primary. I wont vote for him.


67 posted on 04/20/2012 7:40:35 PM PDT by katiedidit1 ("This is one race of people for whom psychoanalysis is of no use whatsoever." the Irish)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dubya-M-DeesWent2SyriaStupid!

68 posted on 04/20/2012 8:55:56 PM PDT by CodeToad (If it ain't Newt, we're screwt !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dubya-M-DeesWent2SyriaStupid!

Hmm, does that mean, per Jim’s guidance, that now we can’t vote for Newt?

Ron Paul for everyone, now!!!

:-P


69 posted on 04/21/2012 1:12:58 AM PDT by gogogodzilla (Live free or die!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: upsdriver

We are obligated to vote for Romney; Barbara Pierce Bush practically said so, said she disliked dissent in the party.


70 posted on 04/22/2012 7:05:57 AM PDT by Theodore R. (Past is prologue: The American people again let us down in this election cycle.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Notary Sojac

:-) Yeah, yeah. I know. Things are tough all over.
WTH is up with us & those Tea Party folks we voted in en masse nearly 2 years ago that there is nearly no effort to impeach this Marxist? Never mind that the Senate won’t convict him. They- and we, ought to be making a big enough fuss that the whole country knows the whole sickening story (NBP intimidation, Fast & Furious, the Solyndras, Exec Orders...just for starters- and virtually admitting that the BC was a forgery!) We should be *highlighting* the words (Bill Ayers’ words maybe, but be that as it may) right out of 0’s book re his Commie upbringing, too.

Why oh why are we just rolling over & taking it for granted that 0zer0 has a prayer at the WH?
It’s crazy.


71 posted on 04/25/2012 2:53:14 PM PDT by KGeorge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-71 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson