Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: thackney

Silly comment.

Of course you wouldn’t use methane to produce hydrogen to be used to produce methane. One of the holy grails of catalytic chemistry has been efficient water splitting. That is the best place to find hydrogen for this process. And yes, it requires energy. My point was, simply, that if solar energy could create the current necessary to power this reaction, it would be an efficient way to produce a mobile fuel.

Of course, by trapping more solar energy, we could change the earth’s heat balance and create global warming.

(BTW, I am not a warmist, but I believe it is prudent to explore as many alternate energy processes as we can. It’s just good science.)

“Creativity is putting known facts together in new and unusual ways.”


42 posted on 04/11/2012 9:59:18 AM PDT by mike70
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]


To: mike70

But electrolysis of water is far more expensive than steam reforming methane. That makes a bad idea even worse.

This scam is not about energy production, it is about carbon nature. They may have improved the losses but it still operates at a loss.


45 posted on 04/11/2012 10:10:59 AM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson