Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Laser Horizons
Air Force Magazine ^ | 4/1/2012 | John A. Tirpak

Posted on 04/01/2012 8:34:03 PM PDT by U-238

Functional laser weapons are just five years away. Advocates hope that won’t always be the case. The Air Force has been working on airborne laser weapons for more than 40 years, but a fielded system remains elusive. Experts also warn that the US does not enjoy a commanding lead in laser research. And the Air Force’s flagship laser weapon program, the Airborne Laser (later called the Airborne Laser Testbed) was terminated late last year and is now being dismantled.

Still, service and industry experts predict there is plenty of reason for realistic optimism. Operational laser systems that can perform a variety of destructive missions are not too far off, these experts insist, but they will likely be complementary to USAF’s kinetic weapon inventory, not a substitute for it.

The Airborne Laser was to be the prototype for a small fleet of aircraft that would fly outside enemy borders, ready to shoot down any boosting ballistic missiles.

The ABL project lasted 16 years and cost more than $5 billion. In the end, a series of tests proved the 747-based system could, in fact, spot, track, lase, and destroy a ballistic missile target at beyond visual range, but it was deemed by Pentagon leaders too expensive and impractical to progress to an operational system.

Another program, the Advanced Tactical Laser, mounted on a C-130 transport, proved a laser system could be effective against certain ground targets, such as antennae and light vehicles. It too has been shelved.

Both the ABL and ATL used chemical lasers, which, though able to produce high power in the megawatt class, proved cumbersome to operate because of the large quantities of chemicals consumed and the extensive and heavy plumbing they required.

(Excerpt) Read more at airforce-magazine.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 747; abl; aerospace; atl; c130; johnatirpak; kineticweapon; lasers; miltech; missiledefense; usaf

1 posted on 04/01/2012 8:34:12 PM PDT by U-238
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: U-238

Just don’t shoot your lasgun at a shield.


2 posted on 04/01/2012 8:40:22 PM PDT by struggle (http://killthegovernment.wordpress.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: U-238
Interesting.

Would love to know where the Sov/Russians are with this today, or if they abandoned it as well. There was a time when it was thought they were way ahead in laser technology.

In an earlier life (mid-80s), I read a summary that thought they would have MW class lasers on ships within a few years. Ships are such a good candidate, as power to run them is not an issue. Poor bastards hardly even have a navy now.

3 posted on 04/01/2012 8:41:36 PM PDT by doorgunner69
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doorgunner69
The Soviet union used the Sary Shagan facility to test their laser weapons. Some people say that this is the birthplace of the ABM.Sary Shagan was also a major Soviet test facility for directed energy weapons (DEW), particularly laser weapons.Whether the facility is open its debatable.

coordinates:46°23′N 72°52′E / 46.383°N 72.867°E / 46.383; 72.867
4 posted on 04/01/2012 8:50:36 PM PDT by U-238
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: U-238
Functional laser weapons are just five years away. Advocates hope that won’t always be the case.

Well, their hopes are come true. It won't "always be the case" they can only be "5 years away" one time.

5 posted on 04/01/2012 9:09:56 PM PDT by Graybeard58 (Haggai 1, V6.. and he that earneth wages earneth wages to put it into a bag with holes. (My plight))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Graybeard58

I think that its in service not 5 years away.


6 posted on 04/01/2012 9:43:28 PM PDT by U-238
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson