Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 03/28/2012 7:02:03 AM PDT by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Kaslin

The overarching message is actually.. “Help me to win reelection, and I’ll give you all you want.” Am I wrong here? Am I missing something?


2 posted on 03/28/2012 7:06:17 AM PDT by HMS Surprise (Chris Christie can still go to hell.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin
On all these issues, but particularly missile defense

Right there.

"particularly missile defense"

That is the phrase that tells the exact nature of little bammys loyalty.

And is is not the United State of America.

This can be spun by the communist donks throughout the summer till the election but only the O-bot voter drones will buy into it. His weaseling from Tuesday is nothing but a caught pig squealing...

On Tuesday, Obama said his comments, though not intended for public consumption, were “not a matter of hiding the ball — I’m on record”

His fascist lying azz damn sure is "on record" now.

From the comments of Rep. Michael Turner, who chairs the House Armed Services Subcommittee on Strategic Forces, which has direct oversight on missile-defense issues, Obama's pig squeal excuse will have no influence on how his behind-the-scenes sellout of the u.S. will be viewed.

Rep. Michael Turner:

Dear Mr. President,

I request your urgent explanation of your comments to President Medvedev in Seoul this morning.

During the New START treaty ratification process, you made specific promises that Russian concerns about missile defense will not be allowed to affect U.S. missile defense deployment plans. You further committed that the United States will make both qualitative and quantitative improvements in its missile defenses. You have already walked away from detailed promises to modernize the U.S. nuclear deterrent; are you now planning to walk away from your promises regarding U.S. missile defense as well?

As you know, in the FY12 National Defense Authorization Act, Congress enacted, and you signed into law, a provision constraining your ability to share classified U.S. missile defense information with the Russian Federation. Congress took this step because it was clear based on official testimony and Administration comments in the press that classified information about U.S. missile defenses, including hit-to-kill technology and velocity at burnout information, may be on the table as negotiating leverage for your reset with Russia. Despite signing the FY12 defense authorization legislation into law, you then issued a signing statement signaling that you may treat that provision protecting U.S. missile defense information as non-binding. This morning’s comments, on top of that action, suggests that you and your administration have plans for U.S. missile defenses that you believe will not stand up to electoral scrutiny.

Congress has made
exquisitely clear to your Administration and to other nations that it will block all attempts to weaken U.S. missile defenses. As the Chairman of the Strategic Forces Subcommittee, which authorizes U.S. missile defense and nuclear weapons policy, I want to make perfectly clear that my colleagues and I will not allow any attempts to trade missile defense of the United States to Russia or any other country.

Sincerely,

Michael R. Turner

Chairman, Subcommittee on Strategic Forces

House Armed Services Committee

Well now.

Apparently Obama has made himself "exquisitely" clear that his word is worthless and he has absolutely no intention whatsoever to follow what he himself has signed into law.

NONE.

His revocation of Sections 401(3) (4) of Executive Order 12656, November 23, 1988, and replacing it with PART IV - VOLUNTARY AGREEMENTS AND ADVISORY COMMITTEES (March 16, 2012.) in E.O. on 16 March 2012 is in line with his back door treason against the United States missile defense.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2862565/posts?page=14#14

Undoubtedly his plans to disarm the U.S. is spreading like wildfire throughout the entire U.S. Armed Forces.

He is rapidly reaching a point where our military forces will not even attempt to follow any bizarre orders that he may issue near the election. Hell, they probably would not follow him to the local Taco Bell.

That could leave only federal LEO to enforce some election-related fraud his communist, narcissistic personality disorder delusion of reality butt might come up with.

This quote, Obama: "This is my last election. After my election, I have more flexibility." and his radical alteration of Emergency Powers on 16 March to include that authority "in peacetime" point directly to the upcoming election as being THE critical point in his plans.

Whatever the little nut-ball has in mind it is "exquisitely" clear that it will harm the United States both economically and militarily.



trea·son [ treez'n ]
betrayal of country: a violation of the allegiance owed by somebody to his or her own country, e.g. by aiding an enemy.
treachery: betrayal or disloyalty
act of betrayal: an act of betrayal or disloyalty

Synonyms: sedition, treachery, disloyalty, subversion, betrayal, duplicity, high treason

Too bad for we mere peasants but in the light of his comments to Russian President Dmitry Medvedev that is how it reads.

6 posted on 03/28/2012 8:30:20 AM PDT by TLI ( ITINERIS IMPENDEO VALHALLA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Obama - The Teflon Turncoat.

Resident Obama makes Bendict Arnold look good.

But the media will continue to prop him up.


7 posted on 03/28/2012 8:52:40 AM PDT by Iron Munro (If Repub's paid as much attention to Rush Limbaugh as the Dem's do, we wouldn't be in this mess)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin


8 posted on 03/28/2012 8:59:32 AM PDT by Iron Munro (If Repub's paid as much attention to Rush Limbaugh as the Dem's do, we wouldn't be in this mess)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin
"The multilayered shield is actually rather robust, though Obama weakened it in September 2009 when he eliminated ground-based interceptors (GBI) deployment"

Actually there is very little robust...if there is NOTHING to intercept the missiles. The only other interceptors that might exist are SM3s on our Aegis cruisers...and they typically are nowhere close to where they would need to be defend European targets from ballistic nuclear missiles. So it is not a very robust shield.

Poland is right to be freaked out by Obama's betrayal. And so should we.

11 posted on 03/28/2012 12:39:10 PM PDT by Paul Ross (Ronald Reagan-1987:"We are always willing to be trade partners but never trade patsies.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson