To: smoothsailing
It’s also possible he wouldn’t accept the challenge because presidential candidates generally debate each other, not people who aren’t running.
27 posted on
03/13/2012 1:35:59 PM PDT by
Xenalyte
(I may not agree with your bumper sticker, but I shall defend to the death your right to stick it.)
To: Xenalyte
Once he says that publically she can then demand he apologize since he refuses to debate and explain himself...or be branded an abuser of women...you know...kinda like the left did to Rush ... Win/Win ;)
To: Xenalyte
It’s also possible he wouldn’t accept the challenge because presidential candidates generally debate each other, not people who aren’t running. They also don't generally run attack ads against somebody who is not even running.
Do you see who is on the defensive here?
Hint: Her initials are not S.P.
34 posted on
03/13/2012 1:39:19 PM PDT by
Joe the Pimpernel
(Islam is a religion of peace, and Moslems reserve the right to behead anyone who says otherwise.)
To: Xenalyte
It’s also possible he wouldn’t accept the challenge because presidential candidates generally debate each other, not people who aren’t running. It's also generally not wise to post without reading the article.
35 posted on
03/13/2012 1:39:57 PM PDT by
Talisker
(He who commands, must obey.)
To: Xenalyte
It’s also possible he wouldn’t accept the challenge because presidential candidates generally debate each other, not people who aren’t running.You obviously don't know it, but Sarah covered that possibilty quite well.
'She proposed that Obama could also debate any of "the four patriots currently running for the GOP nomination" — Mitt Romney, Newt Gingrich, Rick Santorum or Ron Paul — on the issues.'
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson