Posted on 03/05/2012 3:28:04 AM PST by MulberryDraw
Confirmed Obama's Birth Certificate Not Authentic 2012 !
Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio said President Barack Obama's birth certificate is not authentic.
Arpaio revealed the findings of a investigation into the president's birth certificate at a 1 hour and 20 minute news conference Thursday, calling the certificate "suspect."
Arpaio's team of investigators said they found that the long-form birth certificate was created electronically and never existed in paper form.
The president's Selective Service card was also questioned.
Arpaio's investigators claimed the document has "failed every test we put it through."
(Excerpt) Read more at youtube.com ...
How do we know the confirmation isn’t a fake?
Is there a link to the complete presentation by Arpaio’s team?
Nice report.
This thread says that Arpaio’s videos are available at westernjournalism.com:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2854228/posts
I was disappointed the interview with the lead investigator was cut short. It was his observations that are new and interesting. He appears to be a very sharp, articulate retired LEO.
As much as I would like to see something come of this, I expect it will end up on the ash heap.
There is a loud chorus of leftist and media that just laugh all of it off and call it delusions of us birthers.
Since the Communist control media and education, what can be done?
The only hope is winning over the minds of the American people. As long as we have the Internet, we can continue to push the truth out to those who are still willing to listen. Before the Arpaio report, there were approximately 50% of the American people who questioned Obama’s creds. This will likely take a steep jump with Arpaio continuing to work the issue and as the new releases keep coming out. As this thing goes along Obama becomes more of a paper tiger every day. It is going to bankrupt his ability to maintain the confidence of even his staunchest followers in the long term. The only ones who he will continue to have in his pocket are those who are party to his criminality.
‘what can be done’
We can broadcast this far and wide to the voters. There must be some who care enough to vote against the fraud and criminal usurper! If we can’t remove him through the justice or legislative, we can discredit him in the eyes of the voters and vote him out!
Keep up the pressure - discredit him! Turn the voters against him for his fraud and crimes!
CBS actually aired a rather fair segment! -
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KIARV8WsopU
I'm jazzed about the Selective Service post card. The part about the year on the postal date stamp “08”....ARE YOU KIDDING ME? Did Dan Rather's team get hired out to do this?
I think Shrf Joe needs to figure out WHO produced this phony Selective Service card...because, it sure wasn't Barry Soetoero in 1980! It's a FELONY to falsify a Post Office stamp. Let's get this little fish and explain what kind of prison sentence he could be looking at...then just see how quickly the name Axelrod comes up. (Or Valjar or Mooch, or Ayers or....) Somebody figured out their boy was being drafted into the big leagues and had the pesky problem of not really being a REAL U.S. citizen....Or that it was a bit too murky to be a U.S. Senator with a fast track to being the first “historic” president. I'm thinking this goes to Ayers/Dorn...They were good at documents in their “fugitive days”. Old Billy also knew that Barry got free $$$ for college, being an “international student”. Of course, he knew....HE WROTE ZERO'S AUTOBIOGRAPHY.
I think this is the clearest proof of fraud—and VERY EASY TO UNDERSTAND. Just like the Dan Rather phony letter.
I pray every day that these scumballs are exposed for what they are.
Since the Communist control media and education, what can be done?
_________________________________________________________________________________________
Even if we never get the chance to prove it, if we can instill doubt into the lives of a few million Americans as to Obama’s eligibility, that will be almost as good as proof that he is not eligible.
Since the Communist control media and education, what can be done?
_________________________________________________________________________________________
Even if we never get the chance to prove it, if we can instill doubt into the lives of a few million Americans as to Obama’s eligibility, that will be almost as good as proof that he is not eligible.
This guy could engage in human ritual sacrifice on live TV and nothing would come of it.
Why? Because the media in this country is a far bigger threat then any politician could ever be.
Are you referring to OBL, or the eye witnesses a month later?
Agreed! It doesn’t matter since not a thing is going to happen to the first half-rican American president. There could be video of him snorting coke and it would get a pass. He could be revealed as a card carrying member of NAMBLA and it wouldn’t matter.
The first thing that popped out at me with “the” birth certificate was fathers race. In 1961?! Really, they put “African”? Would never have happend. They would have put “Negro”. No question about that. Sorry state of affairs this once and future wonderful nation has fallen in to. If somebody calls you a racist for disagreeing, just tell them “No, I like the black half but can’t stand the white half”. LOL!
Sheriff Joe is speaking soon on the Peter Boyle radio show this morning, 630 KHOW
We need to stay on this issue this time, Obama didn’t claim the first fake certificate of birth, steering around it, but he has presented a second birth certificate as a valid document, a copy of an original. He has tied himself to this second document, and if it is proven fake, he will be guilty of pushing a fraudulent document to the American populace.
Just wait till the college video is played where obama introduces himself as a foreign student!
It will hit the fan........
Breitbart died for a reason. The videos are it....
exactly.
They could prove this beyond a shadow of a doubt.
They could prove he was a card carrying commie born to a family of card carrying commies.
It won’t matter - not one teeny tiny bit.
Because republicans are evil, and Sarah Palin and George W are the enemy.
I am beginning to have some VERY SERIOUS doubts surround the recent, untimely death and timing of that death, of Brother Andrew Breitbart, Patriot (RIP). He was on to something and was about to blow the lid off it. There is a White House Plumbers squad, or something akin to it, and these are some serious people. We have really crossed the rubicon now, my friends.
Where is Donald Trump on this whole thing? Should not they align forces, and he work the Eastern Seaboard NYC/Boston/Washington D.C. TV and press circuit on this? Or maybe they want to wait a little bit more into the election cycle such as September, and get some court rulings.
Why? Because the media in this country is a far bigger threat then any politician could ever be.
The greater threat to our society is the ELECTORATE!..I am constantly amazed at the the lack of caring/comprehension by the vast majority of the citizens of our once great country. I mention “elegibility” to some of the guys I work with and I get the same look from them as I get from my dog when I attempt to teach him how to use a remote or cell phone..not a clue.
“How do we know the confirmation isn’t a fake?”
**************************************************
To what “confirmation” are you referring? Sign me “mystified”.
Sorry, but I have to disagree! The Founders gave the Media powers granted to them under the constitution to keep the electorate informed. The problem is, they are failing in their responsibilities and thus they represent a much bigger threat then the politicians currently in office. If more people were kept up to date on what was going on in Washington, this administration would have an approval rating around 2%.
As long the the media continues to whitewash, cover up, and flat out lie about the misdeeds of our elected officials, then it's hard to make an informed and intelligent decision on who to vote for.
********
The pencil number "9" next to the item "African": In a recent report on the internet, researchers claim that the number "9" was placed there by a clerk at the Hawaii health department for statistical purposes required by United States vital records laws, and it was not put there by someone at the hospital.
According to the researchers, the number "1" referred to Caucasian, while the number "9" referred to "Not Stated."
(For instance, the number "1" is correct next to Obama's mother's name and next to the Nordyke twins' mother's and father's names, because we would expect the term "Caucasian" to be typed in their "race" space, because we know that the two mothers were Caucasian.)
The researchers wondered why the number "9" (Not Stated) was penciled in when the word "African" is obviously there, and when the category of "non-white" was a possible choice for the clerk when he examined Obama's birth certificate and penciled in "9" for "Not Stated."
So why did the Hawaii government clerk put a "9" (Not Stated) next to the word "African", when the clerk had several other choices from the race menu such as "non-white" to choose from?
Did the clerk make an honest mistake and pencil in "9" when he meant to pencil in another number?
Or, could the answer be a simple one: The space was originally blank.
So the forger typed in or photshopped in the word "African" so that the term "African" in the "race" space in the long form birth certificate released in April 2011 would be the same as the term "African" that we see on Obama's short form birth certificate that was released by Obama to the public back during the 2008 campaign?
Whatever proof (confirmation) they’ve used to determine the bc is fake.
Yep. We are at war with the media. Newt has the right idea in exposing them.
Unless I’m mistaken, I believe this is an “AZ” CBS broadcast, which would explain “fair” coverage. Very little coverage in other states, unfortunately. Also, it seems just TOO ironic that Breibart’s death would occur THE NIGHT BEFORE he was to release damaging videos of Obama’s college years. What are the chances of a 43 year old dying of a “natural causes” at a crucial time like this ????? VERY suspicious !
I believe your right. All we've ever gotten is LOTS of BARKING... but NO ONE BITES!
Ever since the 2008 presidential campaign, people have been debating over and over whether or not it was easy for non-citizens to obtain a Hawaii birth certificate way back in 1961, the year that is on Obama's long form birth certificate released to the public in April 2011.
Recently, Feb.2012, researchers at the Daily Pen site studied the Resident births and the non-Resident births in Hawaii in 1961.
They also compared Hawaii's births to other states that had 20,000 or less births during 1961, the year that Obama claims was his birth year in Hawaii.
The following comparison table is from the researchers at Daily Pen:
1961 United States births -----States with 20,000 or less births:
(I hope that you can follow the statistics in the table. I had a difficult time fitting the table in this message space.)
Residents Non-Residents Non-Resident percentage
Alaska 7502 568 7.57%
Delaware 11,876 976 8.22%
Idaho 16,736 3,218 19.23%
Montana 17,196 2,374 13.81%
Nevada 8,092 658 8.13%
New Hampshire 13,426 2,176 16.21%
Rhode Island 19,330 3,788 19.60%
South Dakota 17,530 5,438 31.02%
Vermont 9,166 1,506 16.43%
Wyoming 8,446 794 9.40%
HAWAII 17,578 70 0.40%
1. Look at Hawaii statistics for 1961: Only 70 births were labeled as being non-resident births, and the percentage of such births were only 0.40% of those 17,578 births.
2. How does Hawaii compare to other states in 1961?
3. Montana, for instance, had almost the same number of births as Hawaii at 17,196, but it also had 2,176 non-Resident births, and those non-resident births were 13.81% of all births.
4. Other states on the list when compared to Hawaii show a lot more non-resident births than Hawaii, the gateway to the United States for many Asian immigrants in 1961 and today, yet Hawaii says that only 70 non-residents were listed as being born in Hawaii in 1961. How is that possible?
5. I don't know about you, but the statistics above---if accurate---proves to me that Hawaii was very lax in 1961 when it handed out birth certificates.
6. That is, it seems that Hawaii in 1961 handed out birth certificates to anyone who claimed to be a resident of Hawaii without first going out and checking to see if the claim of residency was true or a fraud.
7. It other words, it seems that Hawaii had a no-questions asked policy when it came to handing out original birth certificates to anyone who applied for one.
8. Is it possible, then, that Obama's mother and grandmother took advantage of Hawaii's lax birth certificate rules when they obtained a Hawaii United States birth certificate for infant Obama, because Obama was not really born in Hawaii as he claims?
Corsi has indictated that next week the Sheriff will have another press conference to share more information.
This is getting hot.
Forward to the shock!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.