Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

This about sums up the article:

In fact, Santorum’s sanctimonious style might put off even many religious voters. His intense 2008 warning about “the Father of Lies, Satan” having his “sights on the United States of America . . . attacking the great institutions of America — using those great vices of pride, vanity and sensuality as the root to attack all of the strong plants that [have] so deeply rooted in the American tradition” is not the sort of language most preachers, to say nothing of political figures, employ today. American religion these days is heavy on forgiveness and light on sin. We’ve long since left Jonathan Edwards behind. Anything other than comic references to Satan are likely to give people the creeps.

1 posted on 02/25/2012 1:20:14 PM PST by WPaCon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-34 last
To: WPaCon
Because he has phrased his socially conservative views in vivid terms, he is precisely the sort of candidate who will evoke a Pavlovian response from the press.

News flash to Romney pimps - the press will do just that to anyone who wins the GOP nomination.

44 posted on 02/25/2012 2:15:12 PM PST by dirtboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: WPaCon

Please pick Rick Santorum. He is the only viable choice.


47 posted on 02/25/2012 2:22:28 PM PST by maxwellsmart_agent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: WPaCon

If we allowed the press to decide the best presidential candidate we might as well put Obama on the ticket for both parties and be done with it.


48 posted on 02/25/2012 2:25:58 PM PST by eclecticEel (Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness: 7/4/1776 - 3/21/2010)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: WPaCon

“Because he has phrased his socially conservative views in vivid terms, he is precisely the sort of candidate who will evoke a Pavlovian response from the press. Just as they were driven mad by Sarah Palin, they will be outraged by Rick Santorum.”

Assuming this is true, should that bother us?

Are we being led to believe that they will be more fair or decent to someone else?


51 posted on 02/25/2012 2:35:29 PM PST by Persevero (Homeschooling for Excellence since 1992)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: WPaCon

Don't pick, Rick!

56 posted on 02/25/2012 2:48:32 PM PST by gitmo (Hatred of those who think differently is the left's unifying principle.-Ralph Peters NY Post)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: WPaCon

So, don’t choose Santorum because he sounds like Sarah Palin. Yea, that makes sense. So is Mona for Mitt?


59 posted on 02/25/2012 3:11:33 PM PST by OrangeHoof (Obama: The Dr. Kevorkian of the American economy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: WPaCon

I’m sure Wm. F. Buckley, Jr. is shaking his head over the timid piece of crap National Review has become.


60 posted on 02/25/2012 3:13:32 PM PST by aruanan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: WPaCon

CNN and fair are mutually exclusive.


67 posted on 02/25/2012 3:35:04 PM PST by TBP (Obama lies, Granny dies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: WPaCon

Oh, don’t worry, Mona. I’m not.


75 posted on 02/25/2012 4:23:19 PM PST by RichInOC (Palin 2012: The Perfect Storm.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: WPaCon

Doesn’t Mona understand that it doesn’t matter WHO the Republican nominee is, he will be maligned by the MSM from the minute his name is mentioned at the Republican convention. At least with Santorum or Gingrich you’ll be more apt to actually believe what they’re saying, than you can with Romney.


76 posted on 02/25/2012 4:34:09 PM PST by SuziQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: WPaCon

I’m not piocking Rick, but the article is garbage.


82 posted on 02/25/2012 8:40:26 PM PST by editor-surveyor (No Federal Sales Tax - No Way!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: WPaCon
The mask is really coming off these establishment clowns. Their message is, "A conservative can't win." Really? McCain. Dole. George H. W. Bush (when he wasn't riding Reagan's coattails).

As for G. W. Bush, everyone--myself included--thought he was a conservative. In the end, we were fooled badly.

It won't happen this time, Mona. You can kiss my Romney.
83 posted on 02/25/2012 8:44:26 PM PST by Antoninus (Mitt Romney -- attempting to execute a hostile take-over of the Republican Party.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: WPaCon

I support Newt, but Rick would be better than Romney.


90 posted on 02/25/2012 9:07:32 PM PST by Tau Food
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: WPaCon

There’s been no POTUS named Rick, let’s keep it this way. Oh wait, sorry, I forgot Rick Nixon.


91 posted on 02/25/2012 9:12:26 PM PST by Revolting cat! (Let us prey!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-34 last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson