Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

US Judge rules Muslims have a right to assault people who offend them
Human Events ^ | 02/24/2012 | John Hayward

Posted on 02/24/2012 1:03:09 PM PST by neverdem

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-117 next last
To: neverdem
May I point out that the 14th Amendment equal protection clause could be interpreted as giving equal right to "return fire" on a muslim who commits assault because he is "offended". To claim otherwise would be a violation of the 1st amendment if the government gives special preference to any religion to commit offenses upon other persons.

The judge was just plain wrong. Condoning violence by one person upon another person is just plain stupid. The "doofus" in this case was dressed in a black robe. His judgement was not done within the bounds of US law. Kangaroo courts are suitable at the marsupial exhibit.

81 posted on 02/24/2012 9:35:04 PM PST by Myrddin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: allmendream; All

You stated: “If it is the Judges opinion that countries are “properly” governed by sharia law he has absolutely no place within American jurisprudence and should be impeached IMMEDIATELY!

Cheers :>) Easy Does It


82 posted on 02/24/2012 9:48:44 PM PST by eazdzit (Did your Congressman challenge/Qualify OBAMA? WE need a 3rd Party. NEWT/PALIN in 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: WashingtonSource

BTTT


83 posted on 02/24/2012 9:54:00 PM PST by eazdzit (Did your Congressman challenge/Qualify OBAMA? WE need a 3rd Party. NEWT/PALIN in 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Czar

BTTT and keep it there!!!


84 posted on 02/24/2012 9:59:45 PM PST by eazdzit (Did your Congressman challenge/Qualify OBAMA? WE need a 3rd Party. NEWT/PALIN in 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: eazdzit

BUMP


85 posted on 02/24/2012 10:10:42 PM PST by eazdzit (Practicing islam should be against the law? WE need a 3rd Party. NEWT/PALIN in 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: eazdzit

I assume the ACLU is filing an appeal?


86 posted on 02/24/2012 10:17:11 PM PST by womanvet (Santo thinks the fellow at the right hand of the Father asks Himself, "What would Ricky do?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: All

MUST READ

Practicing islam should be against the law? WE need a 3rd Party. NEWT/PALIN in 2012.

BUMP and keep it on top.


87 posted on 02/24/2012 10:17:30 PM PST by eazdzit (Practicing islam should be against the law? WE need a 3rd Party. NEWT/PALIN in 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: womanvet

You posted:”Of Course!! “

Cheers:>)

Easy Does It


88 posted on 02/24/2012 10:33:43 PM PST by eazdzit (Practicing islam should be against the law? WE need a 3rd Party. NEWT/PALIN in 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: PA-RIVER

You posted:”A few miles from Pittsburgh PA there is a big Mosque. A very big building, with a sign. The sign has a big picture of a sword. A big butchers sword, fit for cutting off heads with one chop.
Signs sometimes tell us everything we need to know.”

MY COMMENT: It is time, again, to post the map showing where all of the hundreds of mosque’s located in this country are at.

Easy Does It


89 posted on 02/24/2012 10:44:29 PM PST by eazdzit (Practicing islam should be against the law? WE need a 3rd Party. NEWT/PALIN in 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet; LucyT; Absolutely Nobama; humblegunner; TheOldLady; neverdem; thouworm; ...
I knew if I looked hard enough I could find it.....




90 posted on 02/24/2012 11:08:01 PM PST by shibumi (Cover it with gas and set it on fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
the First Amendment doesn’t apply.

It doesn't. The first amendment restrict government, not individuals.

That said, there's no exception to the laws on assault for "offensive speech" either.

91 posted on 02/25/2012 12:59:18 AM PST by El Gato ("The second amendment is the reset button of the US constitution"-Doug McKay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Redmen4ever
But, to be on the safe, if there’s only one of them, and both you and he are men, and there’s no weapon, no, you can’t use deadly force. Mace the guy. That’s what you should do.

Oh horse pucky. You can use deadly force to protect yourself or others, on the street or anyway. Althougth the details of that vary by state. Doesn't matter if the attacker is armed or not. You can be kicked or stomped to death you know. Lots of ways to kill or maim with bare hands.

The key is, would a reasonable man be in fear of his life or health in the situtation. You do not have to let someone beat on you, you can shoot them to make them stop.

As far as being "safe" goes, "Better to be judged by 12 than carried by 6".

92 posted on 02/25/2012 1:09:58 AM PST by El Gato ("The second amendment is the reset button of the US constitution"-Doug McKay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Redmen4ever
But, to be on the safe, if there’s only one of them, and both you and he are men, and there’s no weapon, no, you can’t use deadly force. Mace the guy. That’s what you should do.

Oh horse pucky. You can use deadly force to protect yourself or others, on the street or anyway. Althougth the details of that vary by state. Doesn't matter if the attacker is armed or not. You can be kicked or stomped to death you know. Lots of ways to kill or maim with bare hands.

The key is, would a reasonable man be in fear of his life or health in the situtation. You do not have to let someone beat on you, you can shoot them to make them stop.

As far as being "safe" goes, "Better to be judged by 12 than carried by 6".

93 posted on 02/25/2012 1:12:12 AM PST by El Gato ("The second amendment is the reset button of the US constitution"-Doug McKay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: El Gato

But the guy was only charged with harassment, not assault. He should have been charged with assault. Since he admitted that he laid hands on the “Zombie Mo”, at least to the police. He was clearly the physical aggressor. yes the atheist was being deliberately disrespectful, but they other atheist was being disrespectful of the Pope, and no Italians jumped out to harass or assault him. , nor any German Catholics for that matter. (The Pope is German after all).


94 posted on 02/25/2012 1:26:40 AM PST by El Gato ("The second amendment is the reset button of the US constitution"-Doug McKay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

bfl


95 posted on 02/25/2012 2:02:39 AM PST by FreedomPoster (Islam delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Thanks for the ping.
BTTT


96 posted on 02/25/2012 4:21:34 AM PST by Dr. Scarpetta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Zombie muhammid faces contempt charges from sharia controlled self proclaimed muslim judge for publicizing the story.

http://www.examiner.com/atheism-in-scranton/zombie-mohammad-ernest-perce-threatened-with-jail-for-releasing-audio-of-trial


97 posted on 02/25/2012 6:59:54 AM PST by MurrietaMadman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Fred Nerks; AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; bigheadfred; Bockscar; ColdOne; ...

Thanks Fred Nerks.


98 posted on 02/25/2012 8:33:39 AM PST by SunkenCiv (FReep this FReepathon!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

Does this judge have the slightest idea how easy it is to offend a Muslim? Has he even met one outside his cocktail party circuit?


99 posted on 02/25/2012 11:35:01 AM PST by Eleutheria5 (End the occupation. Annex today.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

Ooops. What I got for not reading the article first. Damn. He ought to be impeached for judicial misconduct, though.

Will Chuck Norris dress up as Zombie Muhammed next Halloween?


100 posted on 02/25/2012 11:37:58 AM PST by Eleutheria5 (End the occupation. Annex today.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-117 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson