Wyoming has good reason to be concerned about the prospect of legal challenges to its delisting plan if it doesn’t get the legal immunity from Congress. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife a few years ago approved a similar delisting agreement with the state only to repudiate it shortly afterward when a federal judge expressed concern in a lawsuit brought by environmental groups that it wouldn’t provide adequate protection for wolves.
It's a three-fronted war to delist the wolf. The state of Wyoming has to fight the tyrannical Feds, activist judges, and the tree-hugging Left.
Godspeed to them!
Thanks for the ping, George. I'm confident Wyoming will eventually succeed in this.
Very well said, your statement is succint and so true.
Under the agreement, wolves could be shot on sight in much of the state.
This is what screwed Wyomings deal up last time and am glad to see they're sticking to their guns.
All states with a wolf population should have the same clause in their wolf management laws. There's absolutely no reason for people to hava to learn to live with a wolf population.
I suspect many wolves are smart enough to realize where they get shot at and killed and where they don't, well maybe. At least the ones that strayed out of the no shoot areas wouldn't be a problem for long.
Very well said, your statement is succinct and so true.
Under the agreement, wolves could be shot on sight in much of the state.
This is what screwed Wyoming's deal up last time and am glad to see they're sticking to their guns.
All states with a wolf population should have the same clause in their wolf management laws. There's absolutely no reason for people to have to learn to live with a wolf population.
I suspect many wolves are smart enough to realize where they get shot at and killed and where they don't, well maybe. At least the ones that strayed out of the no shoot areas wouldn't be a problem for long.