Actually it was Hatfield and Irion who submitted the forged BC as evidence and did not contest its genuineness. Orly contested the genuineness but did so incompetently, without certifying her “expert witnesses”.
But no judge could accept an internet image as if it was a genuine vital record; it simply doesn’t meet the legal standards for admissible evidence.
OK, I read the whole WND article and Hatfield says that he DIDN’T submit any birth certificate for Obama. There’s nothing like that in the record for his case.
Hatfield takes issue with Malihi combining these 3 cases again, even though it was granted at the request of the plaintiffs that they would be 3 separate cases. Malihi “considers” that Obama was born in HI to a US citizen mother, but neither Hatfield nor Taitz presented any evidence that would justify finding that as a fact.
Malihi is just pulling this stuff out of his rear end. “Judge’s knowledge”. One of the big differences between the sharia obeyed in Iran and the legal evidentiary requirements of the free world including the USA.