Are We Stupid Enough to Reelect Obama?

Rush Limbaugh.com ^ | February 2, 2012 | Rush Limbaugh

[lentulusgracchus]

If he wins another term, your angst over fine distinctions: Romney, Newt, Santorum; will seem trivial and sad as we weep for the loss of our country. Sorry if I was unclear.

The fine distinctions are not fine at all. Mitt Romney is a full-blown liberal RiNO, another Jim Jeffords-Arlen Specter-Mike Castle disaster. He makes John McCain look like Rushmore material.

Four years of fighting off Obama with one, perhaps both, houses of Congress on our side, to bork and dump his Supreme nominees, might be actually better than having Mittens send up two or three more Souters. Remember, Romney is gay-friendly and gun-grabber-friendly. And his record on access capitalism and budget profligacy stinks -- he'd be Denny Hastert on wheels.

Think again.

[stevie_d_64]

K.M.A. ???

I’m only guessing of course...;-)

[meyer]

The fact that the establishment Republican party is trying to force Romney down our throats (and seems to be succeeding at the moment) indicates that we are indeed stupid enough to give this worthless communist a%%hat another 4 years.

[ripley]

“Are We Stupid Enough to Reelect President Obama.”

Uh huh, yup, certainly, ah yeah, without doubt, hm hm, yes,
indubitably.

IMHO

[CharlesThe Hammer]

Listen to yourself:

“Four years of fighting off Obama with one, perhaps both, houses of Congress on our side...”

You’ve already accepted the loss of the white House as acceptable, a given even.

Obama in a second term will be a full blown tyrant. He will shout “Mandate!” He will wield the bureaucratic state like a saber. And, given the feckless track record of Boehner and McConnell, I wouldn’t count too much on Congress behaving in a conservative, constitutional manner. Remember the “Super Committee?” So much for holding the executive branch accountable.

If I could vote today, Santorum is my guy, but I’ll go to the end for whoever is the nominee. Obama must be defeated.

[Mr. Jeeves]

Has Rush apologized to the nation for Operation Chaos yet?

[CaptainK]

But you will surrender to Obama in the end!
And congratulations to you too!

[Sudetenland]

Once more, the empty, patently untrue posting of someone whose emotions override their ability, not only to reason, but to read as well.

I would call you a liar, but I doubt you have the intellect to comprehend it.

You lack the maturity to engage in a reasoned debate. You use the term "RiNO" though you lack an understanding of what it means--or are just plain dishonest in its use--to paint all who dare to disagree with you with the same broad, inaccurate brush.

I have never advocated for Mitt. I have never supported Mitt. I have, in fact, been one of the foremost advocates for Gingrich and Perry before him--the two most capable conservatives in the race--but then clearly the truth is irrelevant to you.

You invoke Reagan's name (I love that you use "Dutch" as though you actually knew him) as if you have even a remote understanding of what he stood for--YOU DON'T. Ronald Reagan loved America far more than he loved himself, his own ideals, or his own ambition. He loved America and he supported Gerald Ford, even after losing a long, bitterly fought campaign against him, because--unlike you--he understood the need to elect a Republican, no matter how moderate, over a Democrat like Carter. Reagan never placed his own selfish desires above the good of the nation he so loved--clearly you do. "Dutch" would have been with me, not with you. He would campaign for Romney, just as he campaigned for Ford. He didn't turn his back on him just because Ford wasn't as conservative as him.

Yep. Your whole pathetic spiel is as vacuous and unfounded as is your claim to be a conservative. You don't even know what conservatism is. Your conceit is as laughable as it is undeserved. You more closely resemble a liberal than a true conservative--I suspect that you are a Paulbot in drag--Lord knows you argue like one.

[Sudetenland]

You really don't even have the slightest grasp of what's at stake in this election. Here's a clue; "the last term of George W. Bush" already seems "like the good old days" to most conservatives--I guess you self-anointed guardians of what is or is not conservatism didn't notice the whole "Miss me yet?" thing.

The last term of George Bush, the two terms of Bill Clinton, and a Mitt Romney presidency all would be far better than a 2nd term of Obama.

You "guardians of all that is righteous and good" are as pathetic as you are delusional. You label any who dare disagree with your flawed reasoning (and I use the term "reason" very loosely here) "RiNO"--just exactly as liberals label those with whom they can't argue facts--for the same reason.

I weep for America, because you and your "I won't vote for Mitt under any circumstances" buddies are going to consign everyone into that abyss should Mitt be the nominee.

I'm glad you don't care about my respect, because then you won't mind that I group you among the worst sort of emotionally motivated, sophomoric voters in America. You may revile Mitt, but you are the true evil. You don't care about America, you care about your own ego. You don't care about your fellow citizens, you care only for yourself. That you would see this nation subjected to a second term of Obama with all the "executive orders" and departmental rulings, that will ensue proves your lack of devotion to our nation and our Constitution.

And very clearly, you know nothing of Lloyd Bentsen if you believe that he would have been better than Mitt Romney. He was a slimy a Democrat liar as there is.

Clearly my use of the word "moron" was an over estimate. You can go back to your coloring book and your letter blocks now, little boy.

[Let_It_Be_So]

“The quote about fooling the people is attributed to Lincoln, I believe Barnum is supposed to have said,”There is a sucker born every minute”.”

I stand corrected. Thank you.

[lentulusgracchus]

You’ve already accepted the loss of the white House as acceptable, a given even.

When the premise is the nomination of Mitt Romney, yeah. Done deal, Pubbies lose -- and deserve to.

[lentulusgracchus]

I weep for America, because you and your "I won't vote for Mitt under any circumstances" buddies are going to consign everyone into that abyss should Mitt be the nominee.

Then the GOP had better not nominate him!!

Don't ascribe to me, the ruin of the GOP when it's clearly the RiNO RNC, the Bush family, the Yacht Club hangers-on like you, who are engineering this.

And don't ascribe to me the evil deeds of the Atlantic Yacht Club, or the consequences of their self-absorbed folly.

[lentulusgracchus]

Teachers, AFL-CIO, Teamsters, IEWU. Every private union and public union worker will be bribed and threatened to vote DemonRat. GOP has NO chance. They MIGHT pull 5-10% if they're lucky.

But they threw the traces, bolted, and voted against their minders three times -- once for George C. Wallace, and twice for Ronald Reagan.

[hedgetrimmer]

Some people just don’t get it.

Corruption and fraud will get the man re-elected. That’s all. Read up on HSBC banking fraud with stolen identities. Some of these identities were undoubtedly used to pump money into the Obama election machine, because this bank and many other international institutions wanted the man in office.

Get rid of the fraud and corruption and an actual real American might get elected.

[lentulusgracchus]

Obama in a second term will be a full blown tyrant. He will shout “Mandate!” He will wield the bureaucratic state like a saber.

Let him. What was the field of Waterloo full of? Dead French cavalrymen.

It only takes ONE member of the House of Representatives to introduce articles of impeachment -- and he is always in order, and has the floor. Think about it. All 200-plus GOP House members, including the Tea Party Class of 2010, gutless wonders?

Don't think so.

[lentulusgracchus]

"Dutch" would have been with me, not with you. He would campaign for Romney, just as he campaigned for Ford.

Listen to you. "Ronald Reagan would campaign for The Willard." What a joke.

I'm going to let that idea linger in lights -- let's see how many FReepers believe you.

FReepers? How about it?

[lentulusgracchus]

And very clearly, you know nothing of Lloyd Bentsen if you believe that he would have been better than Mitt Romney. He was a slimy a Democrat liar as there is.

And blah, blah, blah.

I've forgotten more about Ronald Reagan and/or Lloyd Bentsen than you've ever heard about. Get lost, Romneybot.

Just like a RiNO -- claim to be a conservative, claim to support some conservative candidate, and then push the RiNO, Romneybot meme as hard as you can, slagging everyone who opposes The Willard.

Been nice knowing you -- not.

[lentulusgracchus]

You may revile Mitt, but you are the true evil. You don't care about America, you care about your own ego.

Get me a beer.

[Sudetenland]

"Listen to you." Boy, now there's a compelling argument--if you're a liberal or a Paulbot. Your use of logic and reason is devastating (if you're as mature as your post implies . . . say in about your sophomore year).

Did Ronald Reagan, or did he not campaign for Gerald Ford after he lost the nomination?

You can't refute what I've asserted, because the fact remains that Reagan was a Republican and supported the party and the ticket, even if he didn't agree with Ford completely, therefore you are forced to resort to empty attempts at ridicule. Clearly he had a better grasp of reality and of the critical issues than those who think as you do.

What's the matter, cat got your tongue? LOL!!!!

[Kazan]

The last term of George Bush, the two terms of Bill Clinton, and a Mitt Romney presidency all would be far better than a 2nd term of Obama.

Great. Now, you have lowered your principles so far that you'd be satisfied with a third Clinton term? Unbelievable.

The second term of Bush was a DISASTER. Have you forgotten Democrats nearly gained filibuster-proof control of Congress because of Bush's massive spending? We'll have just as many loses under Romney and Romney won't even be as conservative as Bush was.

That you would see this nation subjected to a second term of Obama with all the "executive orders" and departmental rulings, that will ensue proves your lack of devotion to our nation and our Constitution.

Let him try and we'll have another mid-term in 2014 like we had in 2010.

A growing conservative majority in Congress with Obama in the White House is a lot more likely to achieve something conservative than a shrinking Republican minority with Romney in it.