Obama Got Served

American Thinker ^ | February 1, 2012 | Cindy Simpson

[bushpilot1]

[philman_36]

"The Trouble With Tribbles" I don't get it in relation to my reply.
Rommel never did get around to writing his book on tank tactics.
It seems he had a little "indigestion trouble" from Adolf's cooking.

[MHGinTN]

It's from the script for Patton ... where Patton is just taking over the North African campaign and his HQ is strafed. George C Scot is about to be standing in the street firing his little semi-auto back-up belly pistol at a German plane flying at him guns blazing.

[bushpilot1]

Meet the future political candidates being groomed by Axelrod.

[bushpilot1]

The Speaker of the House calling the House into session circa 2032

[philman_36]

...where Patton is just taking over the North African campaign and his HQ is strafed.

Nope, wrong scene. @Magnificent Bastard
It was as he saw he was winning the tank battle.

[philman_36]

Might as well be Tribbles.

[bushpilot1]

Vattel knew what would happen..we can see it today.

[MHGinTN]

Try to keep up. The phrase ‘now dammit that’s enough’ is from the scene where Patton’s HQ is strafed.

[Kansas58]

It is a big mistake to claim every fight is Constitutional. In this case, it is entirely possible for Constitutional Conservatives to disagree with you on the merits, in fact it is highly likely that most will disagree.

[philman_36]

Oh, damn. Just let me get that piece of egg off...

[Kansas58]

Tell me how Congress was able to do so, if you do not think Congress has such power?
Clearly, Congress DID legislate citizenship at birth, by statute, several times!

You Birthers have contradicted yourself several times in this thread, you all need to have a meeting soon, so that you can get your stories straight!

Birthers have stated that Congress has no power to legislate Citizenship.

Birthers have also posted links and quotations and legal authorities clearly showing that Congress CAN legislate the rules for Citizenship at Birth.

More to the point, I specifically DID get you a Wikipedia Link showing many of the dates during which US Citizenship rules have changed, by Statute. I first used the State Department website as my proof source, a few years ago, but Hillary has changed the application for Passport so that it is not nearly as specific and helpful in this area.

[Kansas58]

Another point:
Congress can not legislate rules for Naturalized Citizenship, until Congress is sure who NEEDS a Naturalization Process, for Citizenship.
The Constitution does not make this clear, so Congress acted, several different times, to define Citizenship at Birth in different ways.

[mojitojoe]

Still here defending Mr. “I won” I see. Your pal Trumandogz met with a mighty lightning bolt zot a while ago, so now it’s just you to carry the torch for the zotted Trumandogz and Non-Sequitur. I would be willing to bet you’re going to find it very lonely without your threesome. Now it’s just you, but not to worry, they are or will be back with other names and we will spot them again and again because they are just too darn obvious.

[Bubba Ho-Tep]

Yeah, so you’ve been saying for a year or more. You do know that you’re considered something of a joke around here, right?

[GregoryFul]

Some authorities go further and include as citizens children born within the jurisdiction without reference to the citizenship of their parents. As to this class there have been doubts

Unfortunately, no definitive, exclusive definition of NBC has been established, at least by this citation.

[GregoryFul]

It is absurd that if the USSC's opinion in 1874 was that the very important Constitutional term NBC was ill-defined, that the matter was not addressed and resolved so that were no future doubts as to was and was not an NBC. Stupid men!

And now we as a society continue the nonsense?

[DiogenesLamp]

A "born citizen" is not the same thing as a "natural born citizen." Rogers v Bellei demonstrates this.

I'm stealing that.

And you are welcome to it! :)

[mojitojoe]

Yes, I know. Non-Sequitur and Trumandogz used to say the same thing. Too bad they aren’t here anymore. Now you’re all alone. No more threesome, not even a pair, just you....for now.

[SvenMagnussen]

GA Admin Hearing Decision, GA SoS Decision Appeal
is de novo in GA Superior Court

O.C.G.A. 50-13-13 (2010) 50-13-13. Opportunity for hearing in contested cases; notice; counsel; subpoenas; record; enforcement powers; revenue cases

(a) In addition to any other requirements imposed by common law, constitution, statutes, or regulations:

(1) In any contested case, all parties shall be afforded an opportunity for hearing after reasonable notice served personally or by mail;

(2) The notice shall include:

(A) A statement of the time, place, and nature of the hearing;

(B) A statement of the legal authority and jurisdiction under which the hearing is to be held;

(C) A reference to the particular section of the statutes and rules involved;

(D) A short and plain statement of the matters asserted. If the agency or other party is unable to state the matters in detail at the time, the notice may be limited to a statement of the issues involved. Thereafter, upon application, a more definite and detailed statement shall be furnished; and

(E) A statement as to the right of any party to subpoena witnesses and documentary evidence through the agency;

(3) Opportunity shall be afforded all parties to be represented by legal counsel and to respond and present evidence on all issues involved;

(4) Unless precluded by law, informal disposition may be made of any contested case by stipulation, agreed settlement, consent order, or default;

(5) Unless specifically precluded by statute, in addition to the agency, any contested case may be held before any agency representative who has been selected and appointed by the agency for such purpose. Before appointing a hearing representative, the agency shall determine that the person under consideration is qualified by reason of training, experience, and competence;

(6) The agency, the hearing officer, or any representative of the agency authorized to hold a hearing shall have authority to do the following: administer oaths and affirmations; sign and issue subpoenas; rule upon offers of proof; regulate the course of the hearing, set the time and place for continued hearings, and fix the time for filing briefs; dispose of motions to dismiss for lack of agency jurisdiction over the subject matter or parties or for any other ground; dispose of motions to amend or to intervene; provide for the taking of testimony by deposition or interrogatory; and reprimand or exclude from the hearing any person for any indecorous or improper conduct committed in the presence of the agency or the hearing officer;

(7) Subpoenas shall be issued without discrimination between public and private parties. When a subpoena is disobeyed, any party may apply to the superior court of the county where the contested case is being heard for an order requiring obedience. Failure to comply with such order shall be cause for punishment as for contempt of court. The costs of securing the attendance of witnesses, including fees and mileage, shall be computed and assessed in the same manner as prescribed by law in civil cases in the superior court;

(8) A record shall be kept in each contested case and shall include:

(A) All pleadings, motions, and intermediate rulings;

(B) A summary of the oral testimony plus all other evidence received or considered except that oral proceedings or any part thereof shall be transcribed or recorded upon request of any party. Upon written request therefor, a transcript of the oral proceeding or any part thereof shall be furnished to any party of the proceeding. The agency shall set a uniform fee for such service;

(C) A statement of matters officially noticed;

(D) Questions and offers of proof and rulings thereon;

(E) Proposed findings and exceptions;

(F) Any decision (including any initial, recommended, or tentative decision), opinion, or report by the officer presiding at the hearing; and

(G) All staff memoranda or data submitted to the hearing officer or members of the agency in connection with their consideration of the case; and

(9) Findings of fact shall be based exclusively on the evidence and on matters officially noticed.

...

(c) Except in cases in which a hearing has been demanded under Code Section 50-13-12 [an aggrieved taxpayer filing against Department of Revenue *], subsection (a) of this Code section and the other provisions of this chapter concerning contested cases shall not apply to any case arising in the administration of the revenue laws, which case is subject to a subsequent de novo trial of the law and the facts in the superior court. ---------------------------------

[note *] comment and emphasis are my own.

You've got to get Obama on the witness stand to testify under oath about his citizenship after he returned from Indonesia. If not, contempt of Court can be requested in Georgia Superior Court.