Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama Got Served
American Thinker ^ | February 1, 2012 | Cindy Simpson

Posted on 02/01/2012 7:17:02 PM PST by Sallyven

[snip]...Jablonski remained true to his word -- neither he nor Obama showed up for the January 26 hearing. I noted last week that Obama was not scheduled to be anywhere near Atlanta on the date of the hearing, although I had wondered if still, perhaps, Georgia might be on his mind. According to reports in the blogosphere, the president's schedule on the morning of the 26th was open, and according to an unnamed source, Obama watched the live feed of the hearings.

Perhaps Obama, as well as the several mainstream media news outlets I spotted at the hearing, were merely watching in hopes that the "crazy birthers" would really do something...well, crazy. Or unlawful. In fact, though, it was the president himself and his defense team who were the ones defying the rule of law.

The mainstream media, in lockstep with Obama, reported nothing of the events, in a stunning blackout on a truly historic hearing -- one that discussed the eligibility of a sitting president to run for a second term. And more troubling was the fact that the media failed to acknowledge the even more sensational news -- that the president and his defense attorney snubbed an official subpoena.

Today, Attorney Van Irion, on behalf of his client, Georgia resident David Welden, filed a "Motion for Finding of Contempt" with Judge Malihi...

(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events; US: District of Columbia; US: Georgia
KEYWORDS: 2012; 2012election; abovethelaw; areyoubeingserved; ballot; bho44; bhocorruption; bhofascism; birthcertificate; blog; bloggersandpersonal; braking; certifigate; constitution; contempt; contemptofcourt; corruption; democrats; election; election2012; elections; fraud; georgia; imom; impeach; lawless; liberalfascism; naturalborncitizen; naturalized; nobama; nobama2012; nonserviam; obama; scofflaw; snot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 681-693 next last
To: Sallyven

Strange. Last I checked, state courts couldn’t issue subpoenas to persons who aren’t in that state. They don’t have jurisdiction. All they can do is request that the witness’s state’s courts issue one. And even then, it is generally only available for depositions, not to compel appearance in court.


41 posted on 02/01/2012 8:05:00 PM PST by The Pack Knight (Laugh, and the world laughs with you. Weep, and the world laughs at you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MHGinTN
Unfortunately, I'm pretty sure that she didn't become naturalized until after my birth.
42 posted on 02/01/2012 8:05:29 PM PST by Stepan12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Kansas58

But not a NATURAL BORN CITIZEN!!!!


43 posted on 02/01/2012 8:05:40 PM PST by DMZFrank
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Sallyven
Today, Attorney Van Irion, on behalf of his client, Georgia resident David Welden, filed a "Motion for Finding of Contempt" with Judge Malihi.

And what sort of reception did that get?

44 posted on 02/01/2012 8:05:48 PM PST by Lady Lucky (I like to fire people. I don't care about the poor.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stepan12

If she was a naturalized citizen before you were born, you would be natural born. For example, Dukakis was eligible because of this.


45 posted on 02/01/2012 8:06:25 PM PST by Vermont Lt (I just don't like anything about the President. And I don't think he's a nice guy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck

It only takes a thread to unravel an entire garment.

Totalitarians buy, imprison or kill to affect their control.

It just takes some people in the right places who don’t care about these things to resist, and bring the house of cards down.

Psalm 127:1 “1 Except the LORD build the house, they labour in vain that build it:”


46 posted on 02/01/2012 8:06:58 PM PST by One Name (Go to the enemy's home court and smoke his ass.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: The Sons of Liberty

Actually, Barry could not appear because he was likely to lose the case on the grounds that he had used forged documents to optain ballot entry, so he had no alternative but to ignore the court summons. He is a criminal oh so close to being apprehended, and there is so much power at stake, the GA court will be dealt with illicitly and the issue will be buried by the media which is the enemy of We The People.


47 posted on 02/01/2012 8:07:11 PM PST by MHGinTN (Being deceived can be cured.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: The Sons of Liberty
What a ridiculous post!
The VAST majority of Conservative leaders think that you are wrong on this point.
A near Unanimous number of lawyers think you are wrong.
A near Unanimous number of elected officials think you are wrong.

More than half, of all the above, do NOT want Obama to be reelected.

48 posted on 02/01/2012 8:07:29 PM PST by Kansas58
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Sallyven

What’s going on in Florida?

http://obamaballotchallenge.com/sunshine-state-shenanigans


49 posted on 02/01/2012 8:08:43 PM PST by Mortrey (Impeach President Soros)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MHGinTN

I’ve been around some dirty people in government, and this is exactly how they play it.

They get to take a graceful exit usually because they hold dirt on others themselves.

It’s a house of cards.


50 posted on 02/01/2012 8:11:07 PM PST by One Name (Go to the enemy's home court and smoke his ass.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Carry_Okie
No, not at all.
Again, Case Law can be overturned, rather easily, by Legislation after said case is decided.
The “Case Law” that radical Birthers bring up was all decided PRIOR to Congressional action and guidance on Citizenship issues.
Congress does have the power to interpret, enact, enforce and define the Constitution.

“Natural Born Citizen” has ALWAYS meant “Citizen at the Moment of Birth” -—

However, Congress has changed the rules, more than once, as to which New Borns qualify, and which do not.

51 posted on 02/01/2012 8:11:48 PM PST by Kansas58
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Sallyven
Not even King George is allowed to cross the thresshold of even one of these Sovereign United States without permission or be arrested for entering not only a state, but the country illegally. I'm sure that is a law somewhere.

(Slighly paraphrased, I think.)

52 posted on 02/01/2012 8:14:58 PM PST by Eastbound ( 3-7-77)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stepan12
You would be laughed at by nearly every Constitutional scholar in the country.

Your “Case Law” does not control in this matter, not at all.

It is entirely possible to despise Obama and STILL disagree with you.

53 posted on 02/01/2012 8:15:22 PM PST by Kansas58
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: LucyT; Brown Deer; null and void
according to an unnamed source, Obama watched the live feed of the hearings

ping

54 posted on 02/01/2012 8:15:41 PM PST by Fractal Trader
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hedgetrimmer

Congress, by simple legislation, can deny Citizenship to “Anchor Babies”


55 posted on 02/01/2012 8:16:37 PM PST by Kansas58
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Hebrews 11:6

This case is not about President Obama. It’s about Candidate Obama. If he wants to be on the GA ballot he needed to show up. Judge Malihi said that it could be that Obama would not be required to show up but the pleading of “I’m too busy” doesn’t cut it in a court of law - so if Obama wanted to have a LEGAL reason to not have to honor the subpoena he needed to present the legal argument. He presented nothing so Malihi said he had to be there. He wasn’t. He had his chance. If there was an argument that would have excused his presence he should have used it. He didn’t even have enough respect for the rule of law to do that.

I hope he is found in contempt of court, because he has shown contempt for the rule of law in EVERYTHING he has done, and this very public, blatant display is for no reason. Why should he watch a live feed of the hearing if he was “too busy” to actually be there? That was a load of bullcrap, and I think we all know why he wasn’t there.


56 posted on 02/01/2012 8:16:58 PM PST by butterdezillion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Kansas58

I think you’re wrong-—the cocktail party republicans are more concerned with getting the senate and keeping their cushy jobs. That’s why they want the “mayonnaise sandwich on white bread” Mittens.
Many are complicit in the non-vetting of Bath-House Barry prior to the elections.

Why no reaction to the TWO Certificates of Nomination Pelosi and DNC Secretary Alice Travis Germond put out? They KNEW he was ineligible and tried to cover for him.


57 posted on 02/01/2012 8:17:35 PM PST by Mortrey (Impeach President Soros)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Kansas58
You would be laughed at by nearly every Constitutional scholar in the country.

I'll never survive Laurence Tribe not liking me, sigh....

Btw... appeal to authority is a logical fallacy. It is the definition of the concept that matters.

58 posted on 02/01/2012 8:19:52 PM PST by Stepan12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: The Pack Knight

I wonder if applying to be put on GA’s ballot means that the person is subject to GA’s authority.


59 posted on 02/01/2012 8:20:00 PM PST by butterdezillion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: TribalPrincess2U

The guy has so many names who knows which one is the legal one?


60 posted on 02/01/2012 8:20:08 PM PST by Jack Hydrazine (It's the end of the world as we know it and I feel fine!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 681-693 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson