Skip to comments.Obama Eligibility Challenges Spread to 6 States
Posted on 01/30/2012 8:25:22 PM PST by devattel
An administrative law judge in Georgia could decide as early as this week whether voters in the state convinced him Barack Obamas name should be removed from the 2012 presidential ballot because he is not qualified to hold the office.
But win, lose or draw, the fight isnt going to be over, as other cases are erupting across the nation, with challenges being raised anew even in Obamas own adopted political network in Illinois.
The Georgia hearing was before Judge Michael Malihi, and while none of the lawyers who appeared in the proceedings was willing to predict what the decision will be, several did confirm that Malihi had considered simply granting them a default victory, because Obama and his lawyers expressly stated they would not participate in a hearing to provide evidence that he is qualified to be on the ballot.
(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...
What an angel!
Hope it spreads like a virus!!!!
And, I hope it incapacitates Bath-House Barry!!!!
The list, Ping
Let me know if you would like to be on or off the ping list
BHO, Holder et al just thumbed their collective nose at this in Georgia, so why should we have hope of different outcomes in any of these other states?
Michael Malihi is a brave man. If 0bama is re-elected, his life could be in danger.
But he’s a Democrat. The Constitution doesn’t apply. He don’t even need to go thru Congress when dictating policy.
Pray for Judge Michael Malihi.
The Judge gets off easy on this one.
He has to enter a default judgment. He can punt and let someone else deal with it.
The Messiah will simply DEEM himself to have been re-elected, this time to a 30 year term!
“Kenya or Indonesia, Moochie?”
“Kenya or Indonesia, Moochie?”
I hope not.
If the court enters a default judgment, Obama will have succeeded in avoiding the Constitutional eligibility question. He will then appeal the default judgment, get the appellate court to suspend the default judgment pending appeal, and then delay the appeal until after the primary. This is undoubtedly Obamas plan.
Because the individual states decide who is on the ballot in their respective states.This info in Georgia has been sent to the Georgia Secretary of State.Lets see what happens.
The judge, presumably trying to “help” Mr. Obama (or maybe save his own skin) took the lawyers into his chambers prior to the hearing to offer a default judgment. They saw right through it and said no, they wanted to present their evidence and put it in the record. The miracle here is that he agreed. So now the evidence is on the record. Let’s suppose the judge rules against Mr. Obama. Now it’s up to the Secretary of State Mr. Kemp who has the final decision whether to put Obama on the ballot or not. He can decide not to follow the Judge’s recommendation. So we need to pray, pray and pray HARD that he will follow the law and Obama will be off the ballot in Georgia and that this is the first volley getting him off the ballot in other states.
PING the Liberty Bell!
I am beginning to think our justice system is a farce. I found out that if they(SCOTUS) rule the individual mandate unconstitional they will keep parts of the law. Now, if that is not “pure monkey law” then I don’t know. They passed the law without the severability clause so one part should disqualify the law period. Now, the attorneys are telling me they just ignore that and let other parts stand....Yikes this is a bad dream world. I guess they just ignore whatever and drive on.
And this is now all in official court records? If nothing else at least there’s that...
Here are the states:
Whatever the outcome in Georgia, the issue is gaining traction in other states, too, including Alabama, Tennessee, Arizona, New Hampshire, and even Illinois, Obamas home political base.
Wouldn't a valid birth certificate do?
Wouldn’t a valid birth certificate do?
maybe he doesnt have one..
“Because the individual states decide who is on the ballot in their respective states.”
I realize that - guess I’m not feeling very optimistic right now about anyone with authority who’s involved having the guts to do the right thing and put that above their own ambitions (or fears).
You’re right - guess we’ll see...one of these days.
“Now, the attorneys are telling me they just ignore that and let other parts stand..”
What attorneys do you mean?
I’d heard various of the ladies on FNC say that they could go either way - strike down just the mandate OR nullify the entire law.
Isn’t there any credible news source with the sense of public duty as well as courage that will report these facts and get the word out to the masses??? (No, I don’t mean WND.)
What about Breitbart - he talks a good game of being a whistleblower.
“And this is now all in official court records? If nothing else at least theres that...”
So what if people don’t know about it. Since it’s verifiable in black and white, won’t SOME paper or news source do the right thing and report this to the public?
(as posted here on FR)
Identity theft is punishable by prison time.
Just what WOULD it take to publish this news, anyway?
Actually, no. The issue that two of the lawyers presented was that because his father was not a US Citizen at the time Barry was born, Barry is not a ‘natural born’ citizen as required by the Constitution. To be ‘natural born’, both parents have to be US Citizens at the time of the child’s birth. Previously, they had gone after his birth certificate & focused on where he was born & that never got any traction. So .... big dilemma for Barry ... how to get a US Citizen for a dad. It is totally clear that his father was never a US Citizen. The 3rd lawyer, Orly Taitz, was presenting the fraudulent birth certificate, multiple SSNs, some fishy smelling immigration docs, etc.
An interesting side note ... there are claims that Romney doesn’t qualify either .... dad born in Mexico, granddad had been stripped of citizenship before he went to Mexico (polygamy thing). Granddad cannot confer citizenship to Romney’s father & unless his father was naturalized before Romney was born .... he’s not ‘natural born’ either. This is why the Repubs have their lips sealed when it comes to talking about Obama ..... if it applies to him, it would apply to Romney. Oh what a tangled web we weave ....
Watch this video!!! Very amazing stuff.
“Wouldnt a valid birth certificate do?”
Maybe, but the one(s) he has pro-offered prove that he is in-eligible.....Think he could come up with one that shows he is after his written “Dreams from my father?” Obama has been too cleaver by half.......
Golly, I'll say! Good thing he's got these folks to clean up his history!
Wasn’t their slogan, “No Job Too Hard”?
“Because the individual states decide who is on the ballot in their respective states.This info in Georgia has been sent to the Georgia Secretary of State.Lets see what happens.”
.... now it depends on how much they offer him
“Wasnt their slogan, No Job Too Hard?”
Perhaps it was “We’ll ‘raise your seal. . .’” ;)
"Obama Eligibility Challenges Spread to 6 States" and counting. . .
We will see.
Breitbart talks a good game but he is too coward to address the obama elig issue, for he wants to be on Fox news.
He’ll wave it in the air and put a doctored copy on the internet but he won’t produce it up close and personal.
ping for later
So in theory, the Judge can enter a default judgment saying Obama is on the ballot because he provided me with a valid birth certificate.
Which basically kills the whole thing.
Other alternatives possible as well.
We will soon know.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.