Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Breaking News: Obama's Attorney In Georgia Ballot Challenge Refuses To Appear At Hearing

Posted on 01/25/2012 2:39:58 PM PST by Obama Exposer

President Obama's private attorney Michael Jablonski has issued a letter to the Georgia Secretary of State Brian Kemp confirming that he will not attend the Georgia Access Ballot Challenge hearing set by the Honorable Judge Michael Malihi for January 26, 2012 at 9am.

Here is the letter from Jablonski stating the reasons why he as well as the president will not show:

Hon. Brian P. Kemp

Georgia Secretary of State

214 State Capitol Atlanta, Georgia 30334

via email to Vincent R. Russo Jr., Esq.

Re: Georgia Presidential Preference Primary Hearings

Dear Secretary Kemp:

This is to advise you of serious problems that have developed in the conduct of the hearings pending before the Office of State Administrative Hearings. At issue in these hearings are challenges that allege that President Obama is not eligible to hold or run for re-election to his office, on the now wholly discredited theory that he does not meet the citizenship requirements. As you know, such allegations have been the subject of numerous judicial proceedings around the country, all of which have concluded that they were baseless and, in some instances – including in the State of Georgia - that those bringing the challenges have engaged in sanctionable abuse of our legal process.

Nonetheless, the Administrative Law Judge has exercised no control whatsoever over this proceeding, and it threatens to degenerate into a pure forum for political posturing to the detriment of the reputation of the State and your Office. Rather than bring this matter to a rapid conclusion, the ALJ has insisted on agreeing to a day of hearings, and on the full participation of the President in his capacity as a candidate. Only last week, he denied a Motion to Quash a subpoena he approved on the request of plaintiff’s counsel for the personal appearance of the President at the hearing, now scheduled for January 26.

For these reasons, and as discussed briefly below, you should bring an end to this baseless, costly and unproductive hearing by withdrawing the original hearing request as improvidently issued.

It is well established that there is no legitimate issue here—a conclusion validated time and again by courts around the country. The State of Hawaii produced official records documenting birth there; the President made documents available to the general public by placing them on his website. “Under the United States Constitution, a public record of a state is required to be given ‘full faith and credit’ by all other states in the country. Even if a state were to require its election officials for the first time ever to receive a ‘birth certificate’ as a requirement for a federal candidate’s ballot placement, a document certified by another state, such as a ‘short form’ birth certificate, or the certified long form, would be required to be accepted by all states under the ‘full faith and credit’ clause of the United States Constitution.” Maskell, “Qualifications for President and the “Natural Born” Citizenship Eligibility Requirement,” Congressional Research Service (November 14, 2011), p.41.

Nonetheless, the ALJ has decided, for whatever reason, to lend assistance through his office—and by extension, yours—to the political and legally groundless tactics of the plaintiffs. One of the attorneys for the plaintiffs has downloaded form subpoenas which she tried to serve around the country. Plaintiff’s attorney sent subpoenas seeking to force attendance by an office machine salesman in Seattle; seeking to force the United States Attorney to bring an unnamed “Custodian of Records Department of Homeland Security” to attend the hearing with immunization records; and asking the same U.S. Attorney to bring the same records allegedly possessed by “Custodian of Records of U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services.” She served subpoenas attempting to compel the production of documents and the attendance of Susan Daniels and John Daniels, both apparently out of state witnesses, regarding Social Security records. She is seeking to compel the Director of Health for the State of Hawaii to bring to Atlanta the “original typewritten 1961 birth certificate #10641 for Barack Obama, II, issued 08.08.1961 by Dr. David Sinclair…,” even though Hawaii courts had dismissed with prejudice the last attempt to force release of confidential records on November 9, 2011. Taitz v. Fuddy, CA No. 11-1-1731-08 RAN.

In Rhodes v. McDonald, 670 F. Supp. 2d 1363, 1365 (USDC MD GA, 2009), Judge Clay Land wrote this of plaintiff’s attorney:

When a lawyer files complaints and motions without a reasonable basis for believing that they are supported by existing law or a modification or extension of existing law, that lawyer abuses her privilege to practice law. When a lawyer uses the courts as a platform for political agenda disconnected from any legitimate legal cause of action, that lawyer abuses her privilege to practice law….

As a national leader in the so-called ‘birther movement,’ Plaintiff’s counsel has attempted to use litigation to provide the ‘legal foundation’ for her political agenda. She seeks to use the Court’s power to compel discovery in her efforts force the President to produce a ‘birth certificate’ that is satisfactory to herself and her followers.” 670 F. Supp. 2d at 1366.

All issues were presented to your hearing officer—the clear-cut decision to be on the merits, and the flagrantly unethical and unprofessional conduct of counsel—and he has allowed the plaintiffs’ counsel to run amok. He has not even addressed these issues—choosing to ignore them. Perhaps he is aware that there is no credible response; perhaps he appreciates that the very demand made of his office—that it address constitutional issues—is by law not within its authority. See, for example, Flint River Mills v. Henry, 234 Ga. 385, 216 S.E.2d 895 (1975); Ga. Comp. R. & Regs. r. 616-1-2-.22(3).

The Secretary of State should withdraw the hearing request as being improvidently issued. A referring agency may withdraw the request at any time. Ga. Comp. R. & Regs. r. 616-1-2-.17(1). Indeed, regardless of the collapse of proceedings before the ALJ, the original hearing request was defective as a matter of law. Terry v. Handel, 08cv158774S (Superior Court Fulton County, 2008), appeal dismissed, No. S09D0284 (Ga. Supreme Court), reconsideration denied, No. S09A1373. (“The Secretary of State of Georgia is not given any authority that is discretionary nor any that is mandatory to refuse to allow someone to be listed as a candidate for President by a political party because she believes that the candidate might not be qualified.”) Similarly, no law gives the Secretary of State authority to determine the qualifications of someone named by a political party to be on the Presidential Preference Primary ballot. Your duty is determined by the statutory requirement that the Executive Committee of a political party name presidential preference primary candidates. O.C.G.A. § 21-2-193. Consequently, the attempt to hold hearings on qualifications which you may not enforce is ultra vires.

We await your taking the requested action, and as we do so, we will, of course, suspend further participation in these proceedings, including the hearing scheduled for January 26.

Very truly yours,

MICHAEL JABLONSKI Georgia State Bar Number 385850 Attorney for President Barack Obama

cc: Hon. Michael Malihi Van Irion, Esq. Orly Taitz, Esq. Mark Hatfield, Esq. Vincent R. Russo Jr., Esq. Stefan Ritter, Esq. Ann Brumbaugh, Esq. Darcy Coty, Esq. Andrew B. Flake, Esq.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: birth; birthcertificate; certificate; certifigate; congress; democrats; georgia; georgiahearing; hawaii; media; mediabias; military; mittromney; naturalborncitizen; newtgingrich; obama; posse; sarahpalin; teaparty; vanity
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-150151-200201-211 next last
Will this prompt a contempt of court charge? We shall soon find out.
1 posted on 01/25/2012 2:40:03 PM PST by Obama Exposer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Obama Exposer

My understanding is that this isn’t about his citizenship or his birth certificate, but about whether he meets the definition of “natural born citizen’.
No?


2 posted on 01/25/2012 2:44:14 PM PST by nuconvert ( Khomeini promised change too // Hail, Chairman O)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Obama Exposer

Leave obama off the ballot. It’s no big deal.


3 posted on 01/25/2012 2:44:23 PM PST by pallis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Obama Exposer

Motion for Contempt of Court Approved.

Send the Marshalls to arrest and detain the defendant.


4 posted on 01/25/2012 2:44:40 PM PST by Responsibility2nd (NO LIBS! This means liberals AND libertarians (same thing) NO LIBS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Obama Exposer

Now that you mention it, it certainly shows a great deal of contempt for the judge in question.

I presume they calculate that a decision keeping Obama off the ballot in Georgia may be the best outcome, since he stands no chance of winning there anyway. And now he can accuse the judge of being a nutty birther, as a way of explaining what happened.

I’m sure the press, the “conservative” Pundits, the RINOs, and Fox News will all agree.

Least damaging outcome? Better than sending in his lawyer and watching him lose.


5 posted on 01/25/2012 2:45:04 PM PST by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Obama Exposer
"This is to advise you of serious problems that have developed in the conduct of the hearings pending before the Office of State Administrative Hearings. At issue in these hearings are challenges that allege that President Obama is not eligible to hold or run for re-election to his office, on the now wholly discredited theory that he does not meet the citizenship requirements. As you know, such allegations have been the subject of numerous judicial proceedings around the country, all of which have concluded that they were baseless and, in some instances – including in the State of Georgia - that those bringing the challenges have engaged in sanctionable abuse of our legal process"

Oh I see... so now we don't need to actually have the court decide the facts, we can decide for ourselves and mail them to the Judge?

Neato...

6 posted on 01/25/2012 2:46:54 PM PST by Mr. K (Physically unable to profreed <--- oops, see?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Obama Exposer

Default judgment for plaintiffs?


7 posted on 01/25/2012 2:47:32 PM PST by wvguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nuconvert

Well yes, Natural born citizenship IS about citizenship.


8 posted on 01/25/2012 2:48:24 PM PST by Obama Exposer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Obama Exposer

This follows the usual Obama pattern ..... the law means nothing to him and as Emperor, he’s above it all.


9 posted on 01/25/2012 2:49:08 PM PST by MissMagnolia (Being powerful is like being a lady. If you have to tell people you are, you aren't. (M.Thatcher))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Obama Exposer

I think Obama is doing this in order to draw attention to this political whack-a-mole game. Earlier, the only republican he could attract to make noise over the issue was Donald Trump. Now he’s hoping one of the 4 remaining candidates will try to make political hay out of this.

After all, that forgery cost him a bundle. He better get something out of it other than Donald Trump doing the Rosanna Rosannadanna impersonation of “never mind”.


10 posted on 01/25/2012 2:49:14 PM PST by Kevmo (If you can define a man by the depravity of his enemies, Rick Santorum must be a noble soul indeed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd
Calls for a default judgment.

There are others who are subpoenaed, What are they going to do?

11 posted on 01/25/2012 2:50:10 PM PST by Dan(9698)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Cicero

I believe that if a candidate is deemed illegal in one state, they cannot appear on the ballots in others. I could be wrong as this is an old memory and I am an older person.


12 posted on 01/25/2012 2:50:38 PM PST by Ingtar (I never thought I would come to say it, but "Go Newt!" Our last, best chance.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Obama Exposer

Just remove him from the ballot!


13 posted on 01/25/2012 2:50:38 PM PST by SWAMPSNIPER (The Second Amendment, a Matter of Fact, Not a Matter of Opinion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cicero

The media was all over Mittens about his tax records, but somehow just can’t seem to get interested in anything that happened in Obama’s life before he burst like a sodden rotten mango on the sidewalk of the national consciousness.

I was pleasantly surprised when I read that the judge had refused to quash the subpoena, but I remained unenthusiastic. I knew then, and I still believe now, that Obama’s minions will find some way to make this all go away.

They always do.


14 posted on 01/25/2012 2:50:48 PM PST by Ronin (Now 15 kilograms down since August last year. Hell yeah I'm bragging!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Cicero
I presume they calculate that a decision keeping Obama off the ballot in Georgia may be the best outcome, since he stands no chance of winning there anyway.

Isn't it ironic that the states with the largest black populations are 'red' states?

15 posted on 01/25/2012 2:50:54 PM PST by houeto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Obama Exposer

Isn’t that contempt?


16 posted on 01/25/2012 2:51:18 PM PST by svcw (For the new year: you better toughen up, if you are going to continue to be stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Obama Exposer

The dirty-rotten-commie-dual-citizen pig and his dirty-rotten, lying lawyer!

They spit on our Constitution, rule of law and the limits placed on the Executive Branch.

I could puke.


17 posted on 01/25/2012 2:52:06 PM PST by WXRGina (Further up and further in!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cicero

You will notice that Obama’s attorney seems to forget there are two other cases tomorrow with other attorneys representing the plaintiffs in their challenges to the president. Jablonski forgets to address them since he so focused on Orly Taitz.


18 posted on 01/25/2012 2:52:23 PM PST by Obama Exposer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Obama Exposer

I love the whiny cry-baby voice you read throughout this letter.

.... on the now wholly discredited theory that he does not meet the citizenship requirements. As you know, such allegations have been the subject of numerous judicial proceedings around the country, all of which have concluded that they were baseless...

...For these reasons, and as discussed briefly below, you should bring an end to this baseless, costly and unproductive hearing by withdrawing the original hearing request as improvidently issued....

...As a national leader in the so-called ‘birther movement...

We await your taking the requested action, and as we do so, we will, of course, suspend further participation in these proceedings, including the hearing scheduled for January 26.

(in other words - we have been down this road a 1000 times.)


19 posted on 01/25/2012 2:52:38 PM PST by Responsibility2nd (NO LIBS! This means liberals AND libertarians (same thing) NO LIBS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Obama Exposer

Since my eyes start to cross when I read “legalese” my take is that Obama’s Attorney is saying: You got NO STANDING, (NEENER-NEENER).

With that being said it’s pretty obvious that they are pretty contemptuous toward this judge.


20 posted on 01/25/2012 2:53:20 PM PST by The Working Man (The mantra for BO's reign...."No Child Left a Dime")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: svcw

A big YES. A subpoena is a judicial order. Refusing to comply is against the law.


21 posted on 01/25/2012 2:54:59 PM PST by Obama Exposer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Obama Exposer

The only people who don’t want to disclose the truth are people with something to hide. These people cannot prove Obama is eligible for office in a court of law. All they can do is hide behind procedural hurdles. When does America wake up and realize that it’s being duped by a fraud??


22 posted on 01/25/2012 2:55:08 PM PST by edge919
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Obama Exposer
Isn't failure to appear without explanation grounds for a summary judgment against the absent party? The judge should rule against Obama and disbar Obama’s lawyer for what is clearly unethical behavior. The attorney refused to even make an appearance and then went to the Secretary of State without court authorization. This should result in a hefty fine and disbarment proceedings.
23 posted on 01/25/2012 2:55:52 PM PST by detective
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ingtar
I believe that if a candidate is deemed illegal in one state, they cannot appear on the ballots in others. I could be wrong as this is an old memory and I am an older person.

Bless you, we are all aging rapidly. I remember seeing that before also.

;)

24 posted on 01/25/2012 2:55:51 PM PST by Irish Eyes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Obama Exposer

the Honorable Judge Michael Malihi

Malihi - has kind of a Hawaiian ring to it.

Wonder if he knows what we know and maybe a bit more ?


25 posted on 01/25/2012 2:57:09 PM PST by A'elian' nation (Political correctness does not legislate tolerance; it only organizes hatred. Jacques Barzun)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: edge919

“The only people who don’t want to disclose the truth are people with something to hide.”- Barack Hussein Obama


26 posted on 01/25/2012 2:58:08 PM PST by Pan_Yans Wife ("Real solidarity means coming together for the common good."-Sarah Palin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Obama Exposer

So it looks like Orly can be oin Hawaii for THAT hearing after all.

They judge in Hawaii specifically set the date as the same date in Georgia, even though he was advised of that date.

Please send a arrest warrant for contempt of court to this attorney for this nasty letter too.


27 posted on 01/25/2012 2:58:25 PM PST by Mr. K (Physically unable to profreed <--- oops, see?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Obama Exposer
At issue in these hearings are challenges that allege that President Obama is not eligible to hold or run for re-election to his office, on the now wholly discredited theory that he does not meet the citizenship requirements. As you know, such allegations have been the subject of numerous judicial proceedings around the country, all of which have concluded that they were baseless and, in some instances – including in the State of Georgia - that those bringing the challenges have engaged in sanctionable abuse of our legal process.

WRONG! No hearing has, to my knowledge, been held on the merits of the complaints. Rather, all the cases until now have been dismissed on procedural grounds for lack of standing.

28 posted on 01/25/2012 2:58:37 PM PST by Petrosius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Obama Exposer

I know you are new and learning but do you have a link, please?


29 posted on 01/25/2012 2:59:29 PM PST by Dubya-M-DeesWent2SyriaStupid!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Obama Exposer

LoL. Those Foggy-OBots were saying for the last weeks that Obama and Joblinski would show up with Obama’s Crayola Crayon abstract birth certificate. Could it be as fake as OBama? Of course it is. Instead, the OBums withdrawal crying and whining at the court. Ha.

Go play more 18 hole golf Obama.


30 posted on 01/25/2012 3:00:01 PM PST by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Obama Exposer

Oh gee...I’m shocked! Breaking news /sarc


31 posted on 01/25/2012 3:00:29 PM PST by bigbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Obama Exposer

Issue a Courtt Bench Warrant for his arrest for Contempt of Court. Then Serve it, then cuff and stuff him. Let him enjoy the Hospitality of a Georgia Jail.


32 posted on 01/25/2012 3:00:37 PM PST by SandRat (Duty - Honor - Country! What else needs said?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Working Man
Not just contemptuous;

"such allegations have been the subject of numerous judicial proceedings around the country, all of which have concluded that they were baseless and, in some instances – including in the State of Georgia - that those bringing the challenges have engaged in sanctionable abuse of our legal process"

Sounds like legalese for "You might consider a new career at McDonald's".

33 posted on 01/25/2012 3:01:48 PM PST by norton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K

Think of all the layers of civil employees we will no longer need!


34 posted on 01/25/2012 3:03:13 PM PST by NEMDF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Cicero

The letters overall meaning is....

How dare you question the King for some “BIRTHER”
claim. Birthers will be reported to attackwatch.


35 posted on 01/25/2012 3:04:22 PM PST by Dubya-M-DeesWent2SyriaStupid!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Obama Exposer

Wiki:
“Kemp won the 2010 election for a full term as Georgia Secretary of State with 56.4% to 39.4% for his democratic opponent, Georganna Sinkfield.[1]”

Safe enough to let the process run.

I assume Obama is counting on a Dem fed judge giving him a “de novo” hearing later.

Thank goodness Obama and Holder aren’t going to appear- with thousands of their supporters...


36 posted on 01/25/2012 3:05:29 PM PST by mrsmith (What Tea Party nominee have you found for your House seat?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Obama Exposer
I didn't recognize Jablonzki's name. He's a professor at Georgia State. What's his principal area of expertise? Ummm . . . debate, according to his website:

"Jablonski's principal expertise is in the area of debate, where he has worked with Roy Barnes, Jimmy Carter, Andrew Young and others. He undertakes responsibility for every aspect of debates - from negotiating debate formats, writing briefing books, developing strategy and analyzing rhetoric to organizing practices and critiquing candidate performance. A college debater at Emory University, Jablonski has coached academc debate in college, high school, middle school and - just once! - in elementary school. The Barkley Forum for High Schools awarded him gold key coach status. He has been the president of the Barkley Forum Foundation at Emory University for almost twenty years. He is one of the founders of the Urban Debate League."

It's curious. The top of his website has a menu for biography, clients, cases, etc. None of those links are active links. They all point back to his index/home page.

37 posted on 01/25/2012 3:06:00 PM PST by Scoutmaster (You knew the job was dangerous when you took it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: detective

You are absolutely correct in you assessment detective. He by passed procedure to address Judge Malihi with his reasons in his court that was scheduled for in the morning. He instead looks like a cry baby and this action will not set well with Malihi who will probably feel that Jablonski didn’t respect his court and orders. I see a contempt charge, diciplinary action to Jablonski and a recommendation that Obama be stricken from being placed on the ballot. Also, plaintiffs will get to address the court with their reasonings that Obama is not a natural born Citizen. Jablonski will not be there to enter Obama’s COLB for the record. Doing that will ensure Obama a loss on appeal if they try to enact one because their would be no evidence of a COLB ever recorded. This is a huge blunder by team Obama.


38 posted on 01/25/2012 3:06:40 PM PST by Obama Exposer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Cicero
"Rather than bring this matter to a rapid conclusion, the ALJ has insisted on agreeing to a day of hearings"

Obama himself could "bring this matter to a rapid conclusion" if he would produce a NON-FORGED birth certificate.

It's easy.

He does not even have to send a team of lawyers to sign waivers. (what kid of waivers, anyway?)

I just did mine on-line recently- it cost $12 and it came in the mail in 2 days.

39 posted on 01/25/2012 3:06:43 PM PST by Mr. K (Physically unable to profreed <--- oops, see?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Obama Exposer

There is a difference and Obama’s attorney is not making the distinction.


40 posted on 01/25/2012 3:07:03 PM PST by nuconvert ( Khomeini promised change too // Hail, Chairman O)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: norton
that those bringing the challenges have engaged in sanctionable abuse of our legal process"

This happens everyday in today's courtrooms, it's called slip and fall litigation and the liberals invented it.

41 posted on 01/25/2012 3:07:43 PM PST by liberalh8ter (I don't like what the world has become....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Obama Exposer

Who here is surprised, good to be king.


42 posted on 01/25/2012 3:08:05 PM PST by boomop1 (term limits is the only way to save this country.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dubya-M-DeesWent2SyriaStupid!

I’m not the Obama Exposer guy, but here’s one link (there are several out there I saw when doing a search): http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=30746


43 posted on 01/25/2012 3:09:11 PM PST by WXRGina (Further up and further in!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Dubya-M-DeesWent2SyriaStupid!

Link here:

http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2012/01/obamas-attorney-refusing-to-show-up-at.html


44 posted on 01/25/2012 3:10:16 PM PST by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: detective
"Isn't failure to appear without explanation grounds for a summary judgment against the absent party? The judge should rule against Obama and disbar Obama’s lawyer for what is clearly unethical behavior. The attorney refused to even make an appearance and then went to the Secretary of State without court authorization. This should result in a hefty fine and disbarment proceedings. "

Yup. This will backfire on his majesty.

45 posted on 01/25/2012 3:10:20 PM PST by Godebert (NO PERSON EXCEPT A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Dubya-M-DeesWent2SyriaStupid!

Oh I’m sorry. Jeez lol. Forgive me. It’s was just put up on Mrs Taitz website:

http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/


46 posted on 01/25/2012 3:10:57 PM PST by Obama Exposer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd

(in other words - we have been down this road a 1000 times.)
++++++++++
...and this is the first time we have been asked by a judge to present, can you believe it, evidence of the President’s citizenship. This judge apparently didn’t study anything about “Lack of Standing” in law school or he would have applied it here since nobody has standing in any case challenging Obama on anything.


47 posted on 01/25/2012 3:11:46 PM PST by InterceptPoint (TIN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Obama Exposer
URL link to the posted article please.
48 posted on 01/25/2012 3:12:24 PM PST by pyx (Rule#1.The LEFT lies.Rule#2.See Rule#1. IF THE LEFT CONTROLS THE LANGUAGE, IT CONTROLS THE ARGUMENT.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Obama Exposer

So the devil won’t come down to Georgia? Sez his lawyer.


49 posted on 01/25/2012 3:12:27 PM PST by Brownie63
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd

Someone post Foghorn Leghorn reading this letter to the judge. ‘Ah say, Ah say, boy!’


50 posted on 01/25/2012 3:12:55 PM PST by AlmaKing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-150151-200201-211 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson