Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Newt in 2002: None of the founding fathers were for weak government.
Power In The New Millennium ^ | February 21st, 2002 | C SPAN Debate

Posted on 01/05/2012 8:50:47 AM PST by Halfmanhalfamazing

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 last
To: Halfmanhalfamazing

Nice word play to allow for misinterpretation. Weak as opposed to strong? Or weak as opposed to large?


41 posted on 01/05/2012 10:22:03 AM PST by CynicalBear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NavyCanDo

People are looking for a conservative who can beat Obama. They know none of the guys are perfect and many here have had problems with Gingrich and felt Santorum could not win so when he won Iowa, many felt maybe there was a chance. As for those who post all of Newts sins and the problems they have with him over and over, they think nobody has seen any of this before because some people are for Newt. The reality is..people are willing to overlook what they see if they have a candidate to beat Obama. Many felt Newt would take Obama on and although he has warts, he is not the anti-christ as some would have you believe.


42 posted on 01/05/2012 10:22:03 AM PST by sheikdetailfeather ("Kick The Communists Out Of Your Govt. And Don't Accept Their Goodies"-Yuri Bezmenov-KGB Defector)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: NavyCanDo
I am more concerned with quotes from Newt like this one, “The Progressive movement soundly changed America for the better”. Newt

Context needed.

Is he referring here to the Progressive movement of the late 19th and early 20th centuries, or to the present one using the same name?

If he was referring to the first one, I think most Americans would agree. The original Progressive Movement was a very diverse movement. Much of what it did we would today consider positive.

Other aspects of it were eugenic, proto-fascist and anti-constitutional.

IOW, mixed, like most things.

But I think it is difficult to argue that the Progressive movement did NOT change America for the better. Whether it would have done so, on a net basis, had it ever gained unchallenged power is an entirely different question. But it didn't gain such power, and so its primary function was to push the country in directions that were on a net basis positive.

43 posted on 01/05/2012 10:22:44 AM PST by Sherman Logan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Lazlo in PA

To me that is an excuse. It may explain his slump in IA, but it doesn’t cover his decline nationally. The smartest man in the room should have known to stay on topic and keep hitting Obummer.
_________________________________________________________

You missed where Fox News who are in the tank for Romney and almost every ‘elite/establishment’ ‘conservative’ pundit in the country trashed him for the past 6 weeks.....

He should have responded to the smears earlier.

Santorum has gotten a free pass because he isn’t a threat to Romney nationally.


44 posted on 01/05/2012 10:34:49 AM PST by Leto (Damn shame Palin didn't run, The Presidency was Her's for the taking)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: GraceG

limited does sound a lot better than weak.. but compared to what centralized government does today, it is neither limited or weak..one thing it is responsible for are protecting the borders which it does nothing about....getting tired of hearing about what they are doing next...


45 posted on 01/05/2012 11:09:30 AM PST by goat granny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Lazlo in PA

Love Rick!

But he’s no fighter in the Big Leagues.

Show us a Santorum sound bite that’s received any media attention, attacking Obama....


46 posted on 01/05/2012 11:33:05 AM PST by G Larry ("I dream of a day when a man is judged by the content of his Character.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson