Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mitt Romney On Course For Historic Double Victory
Telegraph(UK) ^ | January 01, 2012 | on Swaine

Posted on 01/01/2012 3:23:35 PM PST by Steelfish

US election 2012: Mitt Romney On Course For Historic Double Victory Mitt Romney could strike a decisive early blow in the contest to pick the Republican party’s presidential nominee by becoming the first candidate ever to win both the first two states to vote, opinion polls suggest.

By Jon Swaine 01 Jan 2012 The former Massachusetts governor leads the party field both in Iowa, where tomorrow’s caucuses will give the candidates their first test, and in New Hampshire, where voters go to the polls next Tuesday.

If successful, Mr Romney would become the first Republican challenger in the modern primary system’s 35-year history to win both states. Party strategists concede that such a scenario would effectively end the contest after just one week of voting.

The double-victory would be particularly significant because of the states’ contrasting electorates. While Mr Romney, who made $250 million (£160 million) as a private equity executive, impresses New Hampshire’s fiscal conservatives, he is loathed by some Iowan social conservatives for his moderate stances on abortion and gay rights.

However, while his more Right-wing rivals have risen and fallen in the polls, the 64-year-old has steadily persuaded voters in both states that he has the best chance of beating President Barack Obama, who, he claims, “doesn’t understand America”.

"The president takes his inspiration from the social democrats of Europe, who would try to change us into a European-style welfare state," he told a rally at a packed restaurant in Atlantic last night.

(Excerpt) Read more at telegraph.co.uk ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Iowa; US: Massachusetts; US: New Hampshire
KEYWORDS: backstabberromney; bishopromney; dictatorromney; iowa; loserromney; magicunderpants; massachusetts; mittromney; newhampshire; romneybigdig; romneycare; romneydeathpanels; romneydirtytricks; romneylovesobama; romneymarriage; saboteurromney; stenchofromney
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-55 next last

1 posted on 01/01/2012 3:23:41 PM PST by Steelfish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

all GOP primaries should be change to re-vote until someone gets over 50%

anyone at the bottom is dropped

75% want someone more conservative than “Mitt”-for-brains, but he is going to claim to ‘win’?


2 posted on 01/01/2012 3:26:46 PM PST by Mr. K (Physically unable to profreed <--- oops, see?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish
...opinion polls suggest.

I didn't read any further into the rest of the "opinionated" statement.

3 posted on 01/01/2012 3:27:11 PM PST by EGPWS (Trust in God, question everyone else)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

Mitt Romney was seated next to a little girl on an airplane trip back to MA. He turned to her and said, “Let’s talk. I’ve heard that flights go quicker if you strike up a conversation with your fellow passenger.”The little girl, who had just opened her book, closed it slowly and said to The Mitt, “What would you like to talk about?””Oh, I don’t know,” said the Mitt. “How about What Changes I Should Make To America?” and he smiles.”OK,” she says. “That could be an interesting topic. But let me ask you a question first. A horse, a cow, and a deer all eat the same stuff - grass. Yet a deer excretes little pellets, while a cow turns out a flat patty, and a horse produces clumps of dried grass. Why do you suppose that is?” Mittens, visibly surprised by the little girl’s intelligence, thinks about it for a second and finally says, “Hmmm, I have no idea.”To which the little girl replies, “Do you really feel qualified to change America when you don’t know #$%$ ?

FUMR


4 posted on 01/01/2012 3:27:36 PM PST by RobertClark ("Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

You forgot the BARF ALERT

Free Republic is an Anit-Romney website. He needs to lose as he doesn’t represent Conservatives.

You can probably ask the Moderators to edit the Title for you.


5 posted on 01/01/2012 3:29:42 PM PST by show
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

No gold for Willard in Iowa. He paid them out of his pocket in ‘08 and still only walked away with a lousy silver.


6 posted on 01/01/2012 3:30:00 PM PST by CainConservative ( Newt/Rubio 2012 with Cain, Bolton, Santorum, Perry, Watts, Duncan, & Bachmann in Newt's Cabinet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #7 Removed by Moderator

To: Steelfish

Mitt Romney On Course For Historic Double Victory

Dumb headline.

I prefer.. Willard Flopney On Course Per All Polling To Lose Every Southern Primary


8 posted on 01/01/2012 3:37:51 PM PST by CainConservative ( Newt/Rubio 2012 with Cain, Bolton, Santorum, Perry, Watts, Duncan, & Bachmann in Newt's Cabinet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

And conservatives have made this possible by not getting together and supporting one of the other contenders. Great, just great.


9 posted on 01/01/2012 3:38:34 PM PST by OldPossum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tzar

Two States that allow cross-over votes at that.

Two States who whore themselves out for the money to be spent in their States because they are first.

Who appointed them to be first anyway> How did that happen? Does anyone know? What is the history and argument for such a thing?

Why do thes two States get first choice of candidates? and why is it legal for them to change their dates in ad finitem to stay that way?


10 posted on 01/01/2012 3:39:08 PM PST by Venturer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Tzar

“”You know the nomination process is messed up when 2 out of 50 states are considered so important.”””

Bingo, we have just begun. Stand my FReep’s!!


11 posted on 01/01/2012 3:39:53 PM PST by mmanager (Reagan Revolution + Republican Revolution = Bury Obama in 2012 - Go Newt!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; bigheadfred; Bockscar; ColdOne; Convert from ECUSA; ...

Thanks Steelfish.


12 posted on 01/01/2012 3:42:15 PM PST by SunkenCiv (Merry Christmas, Happy New Year! May 2013 be even Happier!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Tzar

“You know the nomination process is messed up when 2 out of 50 states are considered so important.”

and they are two blue states to boot. Why are they so important to the GOP process? Doesn’t make sense.


13 posted on 01/01/2012 3:42:23 PM PST by Qwackertoo (Gingrich/West 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

OMG................shoot me.


14 posted on 01/01/2012 3:44:03 PM PST by mmanager (Reagan Revolution + Republican Revolution = Bury Obama in 2012 - Go Newt!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

Looks now like the only way to stop Romney would be for obvious losers Bachmann and Gingrich to drop out, then act as a team to endorse Santorum or Perry.


15 posted on 01/01/2012 3:45:00 PM PST by Hawthorn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

16 posted on 01/01/2012 3:46:34 PM PST by Scoutmaster (You knew the job was dangerous when you took it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: show
Free Republic is an Anit-Romney website.

Not so much anti-Romney as Romney is anti all things us.
17 posted on 01/01/2012 3:47:48 PM PST by onyx (PLEASE SUPPORT FREE REPUBLIC:DONATE MONTHLY! Sarah's New Ping List - tell me if you want on it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

Don’t know how accurate the reporting here....I’m just certain anyone would be better than Hussein. I know there is a lot of angst over our entire field....Mitt w/his suckass health plan, Newt with his Pelosi photo op, Paul’s kookiness, Huntsman and his Hussein butt smooching, Santorum’s support of Arlen Sphincter, etc.

I just think any of them would be better than Hussein.


18 posted on 01/01/2012 4:01:18 PM PST by Recovering_Democrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Recovering_Democrat

All but Willard the Liberal.


19 posted on 01/01/2012 4:12:27 PM PST by CainConservative ( Newt/Rubio 2012 with Cain, Bolton, Santorum, Perry, Watts, Duncan, & Bachmann in Newt's Cabinet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Hawthorn

The 5th and 6th place finishers Tuesday should get out of the race and endorse Newt or Santorum.


20 posted on 01/01/2012 4:15:43 PM PST by CainConservative ( Newt/Rubio 2012 with Cain, Bolton, Santorum, Perry, Watts, Duncan, & Bachmann in Newt's Cabinet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-55 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson