Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

South Carolina Gov. Haley Endorses Romney, Says Obama 'Scared of Him'
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2011/12/16/sources-say-south-carolina-governor-haley-set-to-endorse-romney/ ^

Posted on 12/16/2011 6:19:52 AM PST by dmz

South Carolina Gov. Nikki Haley endorsed Mitt Romney for president Friday, saying he has the executive experience in the private and public sectors that proves he can deal "with a broken Washington."

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Politics/Elections; US: South Carolina
KEYWORDS: mittromney; nikkihaley; nonewt; rino; sellout; southcarolina
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-194 next last
To: WFTR
I don't think it is indicative of the State. Haley is a disappointment. Every day a new article about something she has done that seems a little off and less then ethical and totally self serving.
21 posted on 12/16/2011 6:33:58 AM PST by marsh-mellow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Tribune7

Go Perry is right! ObamneyCare is one big eyebrow RINO and Newt is a good ole boy DC insider; he is McCain with an encyclopedia and Clinton moderate BS mixed in; RINO.


22 posted on 12/16/2011 6:35:16 AM PST by Dubya-M-DeesWent2SyriaStupid!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: heiss

VP pick by Romney is the ONLY sane explanation for the business as usual usual endorsement


23 posted on 12/16/2011 6:36:18 AM PST by RitaOK (wRasmussen- the polling standard for accuracy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: dmz

This is nothing more than the establishment trying to get Mitt a victory in the South Carolina primary, because historically, the winner of SC gets the nomination.

They played this game four years ago and they’re playing it again. It remains to be seen if the people of SC will go along with it.


24 posted on 12/16/2011 6:36:40 AM PST by cotton1706
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marsh-mellow

I think SC will wise up and go Perry. That is our last hope.


25 posted on 12/16/2011 6:36:44 AM PST by Dubya-M-DeesWent2SyriaStupid!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: FryingPan101

“Well. I had hoped for a Perry endorsement”

Me too. But we all know it’s political payback for last year’s endorsement in the governor’s race.

I think she would have been a lot smarter to endorse Perry. Many Southern voters are not Romney fans and do NOT want socialized medicine. She would have been a lot smarter to endorse a Southern candidate.

I think the real person Obama is afraid of is Rick Perry, a candidate with the most executive branch experience out of any of the GOP candidates and who isn’t afraid to tell it like it is.

With Romney as our nominee, Obama would simply look at him and say, “I don’t know why you’re even arguing against me because we modeled our health care plan after YOURS!”


26 posted on 12/16/2011 6:37:41 AM PST by wk4bush2004 ("FREEDOM, PROSPERITY, RESPONSIBILITY: RICK PERRY 2012!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: dmz

Nikki honey, nobody is scared of Mittens
Why, when he loses, he can be his own dummy in Madame Tussauds

Now if you ran ...I could smell some fear


27 posted on 12/16/2011 6:38:51 AM PST by silverleaf (common sense is not so common- voltaire)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dmz
Really sorry to see this.

Romney is my last choice....if that.

I'd vote Perry before Romney. I just hope it doesn't come down to this.

Kind of sours me on Haley, though.

28 posted on 12/16/2011 6:39:50 AM PST by CAluvdubya
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cotton1706
This is nothing more than the establishment trying to get Mitt a victory in the South Carolina primary, because historically, the winner of SC gets the nomination.

The only reason McLame won SC last time is because of cross-over voters. Is there still an open primary (the purpose of which I NEVER understood - why allow people who aren't committed to your party vote in its primary)?

Anyhow, this is VERY disappointing. Seems more and more as time goes on that the Tea Party moniker was used to obtain power by the usual crew of self-serving, go-along, get-along RINOs. Not all of them, to be sure, but it seems to be the case here.

29 posted on 12/16/2011 6:42:09 AM PST by Ancesthntr (Bibi to Odumbo: Its not going to happen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: dmz

“I must say that the first dozen or so responses are entirely unlike what happened after O’Donnell’s endorsement was made public.”

That’s because most realized O’Donnell was trying to sabotage Mitt with her “endorsement”.


30 posted on 12/16/2011 6:45:01 AM PST by ngat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: dmz

I like her but I don’t agree. Gingrich would wipe the floor with Obama in any debate. Newt suggested seven 3-hour debates with Obama? That would be the best TV ever!


31 posted on 12/16/2011 6:45:16 AM PST by mikey_hates_everything
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ancesthntr

The Tea Party failed to put a viable candidate on the field. If you want to beat Obama, you have to pick from the establishment candidates. Romney is a better pick than Newt. Haley made the rational choice.


32 posted on 12/16/2011 6:45:25 AM PST by Huck (No.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: TexasFreeper2009
Rush has been leading everyone on this point. Many who call themselves Conservatives actually have little faith in Conservatism being acceptable to a majority of the electorate. Instead, they have drank the kool-Aid and believe that moderacy is the key to being elected.

Of course, historically they are all dead wrong.

I'm fairly confident that should Romney actually win the nomination there will be a major third party candidate.

With the lack of faith in Conservatism by so many Republican leaders, it might just be a battle which has to happen.

To those who say that a third party will likely mean an Obama reelection, I submit that nominating a Republican Moderate would guarantee an Obama reelection.

33 posted on 12/16/2011 6:45:41 AM PST by Rational Thought
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: dmz
Very disappointing. I obviously misjudged Governor Nikki Haley.

Apparently the Republican establishment still holds the power to foist yet another losing RINO on GOP voters and using Republican governors that we assumed were somewhat conservative to endorse a mega-RINO like Mitt Romney is one of their tools. Too bad. I wonder what Haley was thinking to pretend that Obama 'fears' the Mandate Man, Mitt Romney? Maybe it's his bright smile or his perfect hair.

I'll vote in my state's Republican primary but after that, I'm changing my voter registration to independent. The Republican party no longer 'represents' me in any substantive way and I'm sick of their endless parade of RINO candidates (often losers) and 'me-too' attitude toward big, intrusive government.

34 posted on 12/16/2011 6:45:58 AM PST by Jim Scott
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dmz

Oh yeah Mittens is just soooo intimidating. At the first mention of Bain Capital this guy whined and looked like a wimp. Gimme a break. Mittens response to any attack on him is to yell “no fair.”. Like that will stop Obama!


35 posted on 12/16/2011 6:47:25 AM PST by FlipWilson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dmz

Mmmno.


36 posted on 12/16/2011 6:47:45 AM PST by RichInOC (Palin 2012: The Perfect Storm.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dmz

Disappointing for sure.

The post debate MSM reporting clearly indicates that the MSM is pushing for a Romney-Bachman ticket. It is even clearer that the one they fear is Gingrich.

Newt is the one who said Barney Frank and Chris Dodd should go to jail. He’s the one who said the Palestinians are an invented people. He has called Obama an “Alinsky radical”. Newt said that John Bolton would be his sec of defense.

Newt’s the gunslinger, firing real bullets at both Obama and liberalism itself. He wants to be sheriff, and he’s telling us who he’d shoot first. He’s bursting through the saloon doors, guns blazing, while the rest are at the bar ordering sasparilla.

Liberals fear Newt could put Obama on the defensive, having to defend not only his policies, but his ideology. They fear Newt could put liberalism on trial, and I believe the jury is in such a foul mood he just might get a conviction.


37 posted on 12/16/2011 6:48:38 AM PST by wayoverontheright
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dmz

Who cares who anyone endorses anymore. They are worthless. At the end of the day, Romney is still going to lose and Haley is still going to be a fine Gov.


38 posted on 12/16/2011 6:50:33 AM PST by Lazlo in PA (Now living in a newly minted Red State.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cotton1706

You’re correct about the establishment but I read an article that things have changed so much that SC’s pick is possibly not the nominee.I wonder if Jindal bows to Rove or if he will endorse Perry?If it wouldn’t be for the Newt love (which is fading) Perry would be up there and beat Romney.So the Newt bots in the tank for a RINO are enabling Romney.If Perry picked Palin as a VP would the Newt bots quit the Perry jealousy and hate? I don’t buy they’re BS story that Perry is pro amnesty when they are supporting a RINO....it makes no sense.Perry will do what needs to be done and that is stop the insider trading cronyism in DC and put em all on Part time with pay cuts.Newt will just carry on the ponzi scheme insider trading as he is one of them and buds with them.


39 posted on 12/16/2011 6:51:17 AM PST by Dubya-M-DeesWent2SyriaStupid!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: dmz
Now weighing in on this except to say these two sure are easy on the eyes...


40 posted on 12/16/2011 6:51:27 AM PST by End Times Sentinel (In Memory of my dear Friend Henry Lee II)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-194 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson