Skip to comments.
Photoshopped or Not? A Tool to Tell
NY Times ^
| November 28, 2011
| STEVE LOHR
Posted on 12/10/2011 4:10:57 PM PST by hripka
The photographs of celebrities and models in fashion advertisements and magazines are routinely buffed with a helping of digital polish. The retouching can be slight colors brightened, a stray hair put in place, a pimple healed. Or it can be drastic shedding 10 or 20 pounds, adding a few inches in height and erasing all wrinkles and blemishes, done using Adobes Photoshop software, the photo retouchers magic wand.
Fix one thing, then another and pretty soon you end up with Barbie, said Hany Farid, a professor of computer science and a digital forensics expert at Dartmouth.
And that is a problem, feminist legislators in France, Britain and Norway say, and they want digitally altered photos to be labeled. In June, the American Medical Association adopted a policy on body image and advertising that urged advertisers and others to discourage the altering of photographs in a manner that could promote unrealistic expectations of appropriate body image.
(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...
TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: model; photography; photoshop; software
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-29 next last
1
posted on
12/10/2011 4:11:05 PM PST
by
hripka
To: hripka
2
posted on
12/10/2011 4:19:03 PM PST
by
JoeProBono
(A closed mouth gathers no feet - Mater tua caligas gerit)
To: hripka
So, I guess retouched photos were okay when they were done with airbrushes. But now that they’re done with Photoshop, they cause girls to have unrealistic self-images.
Mhm.
I have some news for these geniuses: it’s the whole culture that promotes those unrealistic expectations. Notating that photos are photoshopped (or airbrushed) isn’t going to change that.
3
posted on
12/10/2011 4:20:51 PM PST
by
exDemMom
(Now that I've finally accepted that I'm living a bad hair life, I'm more at peace with the world.)
To: exDemMom
A man can dream.
4
posted on
12/10/2011 4:23:55 PM PST
by
cripplecreek
(Stand with courage or shut up and do as you're told.)
To: hripka
5
posted on
12/10/2011 4:25:00 PM PST
by
cripplecreek
(Stand with courage or shut up and do as you're told.)
To: cripplecreek
I had to look at that a few minutes - then I LOL’ed
6
posted on
12/10/2011 4:29:13 PM PST
by
JaguarXKE
To: hripka
7
posted on
12/10/2011 4:32:05 PM PST
by
SWAMPSNIPER
(The Second Amendment, a Matter of Fact, Not a Matter of Opinion)
To: hripka
And that is a problem, feminist legislators in France, Britain and Norway say, and they want digitally altered photos to be labeled.I don't have a problem with that as long as liberal's published opinions are rated and labeled for their level of neurosis. I'll give these moonbats a 10 on a scale of 1-10.
8
posted on
12/10/2011 4:35:04 PM PST
by
TigersEye
(Life is about choices. Your choices. Make good ones.)
To: SWAMPSNIPER
9
posted on
12/10/2011 4:35:57 PM PST
by
cripplecreek
(Stand with courage or shut up and do as you're told.)
To: SWAMPSNIPER
Last time I saw a mouth like that it had a hook in it....
10
posted on
12/10/2011 4:50:14 PM PST
by
Cyber Liberty
(To Obama, bipartisanship is giving the opposition the opportunity to do as they are told. (WGensert))
To: hripka
11
posted on
12/10/2011 4:53:01 PM PST
by
reagan_fanatic
(A communist is just a liberal in a hurry)
To: hripka
12
posted on
12/10/2011 4:56:48 PM PST
by
Pollster1
(Natural born citizen of the USA, with the birth certificate to prove it)
To: Cyber Liberty
Didn’t someone say the face is a window to the soul?
13
posted on
12/10/2011 5:07:16 PM PST
by
SWAMPSNIPER
(The Second Amendment, a Matter of Fact, Not a Matter of Opinion)
To: JoeProBono
The shadow under her flipper is in the wrong place.
14
posted on
12/10/2011 5:14:06 PM PST
by
DManA
To: JoeProBono
15
posted on
12/10/2011 5:20:19 PM PST
by
BenLurkin
(This is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire; or both)
To: SWAMPSNIPER
Didnt someone say the face is a window to the soul? Looks more like a swinging saloon door.
16
posted on
12/10/2011 5:35:08 PM PST
by
Cyber Liberty
(To Obama, bipartisanship is giving the opposition the opportunity to do as they are told. (WGensert))
To: hripka
17
posted on
12/10/2011 5:38:13 PM PST
by
LomanBill
(Animals! The DemocRats blew up the windmill with an Acorn!)
To: hripka
18
posted on
12/10/2011 5:39:59 PM PST
by
LomanBill
(Animals! The DemocRats blew up the windmill with an Acorn!)
To: hripka
Photoshopped? Nah, Michelle looks great!
To: hripka
If they are going to do this, then women who wear makeup should be required to wear a sign and a little picture of how they really look.
Years ago there was a woman who lived next door to us who looked very nice. One day I saw her without makeup and she was REALLY ugly. Much worse than the Hollywood stars without it. I didn’t realize it was her. She was a genius with makeup.
20
posted on
12/10/2011 6:15:09 PM PST
by
Right Wing Assault
(Dick Obama is more inexperienced now than he was before he was elected.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-29 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson