Posted on 11/25/2011 10:21:19 AM PST by JerseyanExile
Just because it’s incomprehensible to you doesn’t mean that you can force your beliefs onto others. That’s not convervatism, that liberalism and it never ends. Somebody always knows ‘better’.
Doesn’t Obama know ‘better’ than you and is proceeding to destroy not only your profession but the actual health of millions because he knows ‘better’?
I thought it was pronounced ‘axed’? :-)
Thanks, wouldn't want you to lose patience with me....you might deem me a loser.....
The awfulness of Obamacare doesn't change the awsomeness of vaccinations. The development of mass vaccination was the single most important medical advance of the 20th century. In 1953 there were 53,000 new cases of polio. You would want to go back to that? I remember elementary school classmates in leg braces. When was the last time you saw such a thing at an elementary school? I remember my medical school professors talking of children dying of whooping cough in their arms. You would want to go back to that?
Nobody said it did except you.
Here is a link for a chart that lists vaccines in which aborted babies’ cells are used: http://www.cogforlife.org/fetalvaccines.htm
Sick. Maybe not a toxin, but sick indeed.
Its simply amazing that not only here on FR but in general we read the term ‘lose’ spelled as ‘loose’. Drives me nuts. Also the term ‘dining’ spelled as ‘dinning’. Ok all done with the spelling bee rant.
...All health authorities agree that both the Salk Inactivated Polio Vaccine (IPV) and Sabin Oral or live Polio Vaccine (OPV) were contaminated with SV40 up until 1961. The contamination has been estimated to have exposed up to 30 million Americans and millions more in the USSR (where the OPV clinical trials were conducted) and other countries...
...In the U.S., federal law did not require that SV40 contaminated vaccines be discarded if they were manufactured before the new regulations went into effect. This meant that vaccines contaminated with SV40 were administered to children and adults until they were used up...
Although its name includes the word ‘tax’ to misleadingly suggest some sort of connection with productive activity, the “Family Tax Benefit” referred to is a welfare scheme for families with children, paid and administered by the welfare agency, separately from the tax system. There is no requirement to work to get it, the amount of the welfare payment decreases as a family earns more money, and it is entirely possible to get paid more than you paid in taxes. It really is a benefit.
The problem is that people don’t pay attention to how words are spelled as they read.
Thank You! I wish more people would look at this issue rationally. If vaccines work, the unvaccinated pose no risk to anyone except to other unvaccinated. (Who knowingly accept the risks.) If they do pose a risk to the vaccinated, it really doesn’t matter because vaccines don’t work. I also really hate the all or nothing viewpoint. Like ALL vaccines are absolutely necessary and skipping or selectively delaying any means you are an anti intellectual troglodyte.
Please explain to me why my new born needs to be protected against Hep B. Try to make the case that any child under 10 NEEDS this vaccine or somehow poses a risk to others for not having it. You cannot.
Varicella. Why do children now NEED to be vaccinated against chicken pox? Is it truly necessary or is it a convenience? If it is a convenience why should anyone who wants to forego that convenience be castigated for doing so? If I want to wait for my child to get this vaccine later in life and would prefer for them to possibly get chicken pox and have a better immunity how is that wrong?
Gardasil. Protects against ONE strain of cancer causing HPV. ONE. There are over 100 strains. There are 4,000 deaths per year due to cervical cancer. 4,000. That barely registers as a statistic, but my daughter (and soon my son) HAVE to have this? They have to play russian roulette with their health for this? I think it is far more likely that this “must have” vaccine is a must have due to lobbying and not to sound science.
All you need to know is that even ‘intelligent’ people are fundamentally nutso.
Don’t trust anybody. Don’t listen to anybody. Do your own thinking. Always...
Well, it appears that I was misled, though I don't know whether the poster I replied to knew that this wasn't a tax when he made his comment.
Didn’t know this was a conversation about the legality of the taxes in Australia....rather about the BENEFITS doled out to families there.
A family should not expect government aid—unless it properly takes care of their children. Seems like a reasonable demand.
I’d rather not have the government dole out benefits at all, but, that’s not the world we live in.
A bit like demanding welfare recipients in the USA not to be illegal drug users.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.